Literature DB >> 21324889

Feasibility of a portable pedal exercise machine for reducing sedentary time in the workplace.

Lucas J Carr1, Kristen A Walaska, Bess H Marcus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sedentary time is independently associated with an increased risk of metabolic disease. Worksite interventions designed to decrease sedentary time may serve to improve employee health.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and use of a pedal exercise machine for reducing workplace sedentary time.
METHODS: Eighteen full-time employees (mean age+SD 40.2+10.7 years; 88% female) working in sedentary occupations were recruited for participation. Demographic and anthropometric data were collected at baseline and 4 weeks. Participants were provided access to a pedal exercise machine for 4 weeks at work. Use of the device was measured objectively by exercise tracking software, which monitors pedal activity and provides the user real-time feedback (eg, speed, time, distance, calories). At 4 weeks, participants completed a feasibility questionnaire.
RESULTS: Participants reported sitting 83% of their working days. Participants used the pedal machines an average of 12.2+6.6 out of a possible 20 working days and pedalled an average of 23.4+20.4 min each day used. Feasibility data indicate that participants found the machines feasible for use at work. Participants also reported sedentary time at work decreased due to the machine. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study suggest that this pedal machine may be a feasible tool for reducing sedentary time while at work. These findings hold public health significance due to the growing number of sedentary jobs in the USA and the potential of the device for use in large-scale worksite health programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21324889     DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.079574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  21 in total

1.  Factors affecting the increased energy expenditure during passive cycling.

Authors:  James E Peterman; Rodger Kram; William C Byrnes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Changing the way we work: elevating energy expenditure with workstation alternatives.

Authors:  C Tudor-Locke; J M Schuna; L J Frensham; M Proenca
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 3.  Active workstations to fight sedentary behaviour.

Authors:  Tine Torbeyns; Stephen Bailey; Inge Bos; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Interest in Using Workplace Energy Expenditure Devices Among Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Liza S Rovniak; Christopher N Sciamanna; Daniel R George; Melissa Bopp; Lan Kong; Ding Ding
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2015-12-30

5.  Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior.

Authors:  Todd M Manini; Lucas J Carr; Abby C King; Simon Marshall; Thomas N Robinson; W Jack Rejeski
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Effects of cycling workstation to get tertiary employee moving on their overall health: study protocol for a REMOVE trial.

Authors:  Terry Guirado; Lore Metz; Bruno Pereira; Audrey Bergouignan; David Thivel; Martine Duclos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Hours spent and energy expended in physical activity domains: results from the Tomorrow Project cohort in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Ilona Csizmadi; Geraldine Lo Siou; Christine M Friedenreich; Neville Owen; Paula J Robson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Evaluation of ergonomic and education interventions to reduce occupational sitting in office-based university workers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Antonia Radas; Martin Mackey; Andrew Leaver; Anna-Louise Bouvier; Josephine Y Chau; Debra Shirley; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lee E F Graves; Rebecca C Murphy; Sam O Shepherd; Josephine Cabot; Nicola D Hopkins
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Multicomponent intervention to reduce daily sedentary time: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucas J Carr; Kristina Karvinen; Mallory Peavler; Rebecca Smith; Kayla Cangelosi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.