Literature DB >> 21324748

First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for de-novo mutations.

Svetlana Rechitsky1, Ekaterina Pomerantseva, Tatiana Pakhalchuk, Dana Pauling, Oleg Verlinsky, Anver Kuliev.   

Abstract

Standard preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cannot be applied for de-novo mutations (DNM), because neither origin nor relevant haplotypes are available for testing in single cells. PGD strategies were developed for 80 families with 38 genetic disorders, determined by 33 dominant, three recessive and two X-linked DNM. All three recessive mutations were of paternal origin, while of 93 dominant mutations, 40 were paternal, 46 maternal and seven detected in affected children. The development of specific PGD strategy for each couple involved DNA analysis of the parents and affected children prior to PGD, including a mutation verification, polymorphic marker evaluation, whole and single sperm testing to establish the normal and mutant haplotypes and PGD by polar body analysis and/or embryo biopsy. Overall, 151 PGD cycles were performed for 80 families, for which a specific PGD design has been established. The application of these protocols resulted in pre-selection and transfer of 219 (1.72 per cycle) DNM-free embryos in 127 (84.1%) PGD cycles, yielding 63 (49.6%) unaffected pregnancies and birth of 59 (46.5%) healthy children, confirmed to be free of DNM. The data show feasibility of PGD for DNM, which may routinely be performed with accuracy of over 99%, using the established PGD strategy.
Copyright © 2011 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21324748     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  7 in total

1.  A whole-genome sequencing-based novel preimplantation genetic testing method for de novo mutations combined with chromosomal balanced translocations.

Authors:  Ping Yuan; Jun Xia; Songbang Ou; Ping Liu; Tao Du; Lingyan Zheng; Xuyang Yin; Lin Xie; Sijia Zhang; Huijuan Yan; Ya Gao; Qingxue Zhang; Hui Jiang; Fang Chen; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for inherited neurological disorders.

Authors:  Ilan Tur-Kaspa; Roohi Jeelani; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an update on current technologies and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Kou Sueoka
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-14

5.  Next-generation sequence-based preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease resulting from maternal mosaicism.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Wen-Bin He; Shuo-Ping Zhang; Ke-Li Luo; Fei Gong; Jing Dai; Yi Zhang; Zhen-Xing Wan; Wen Li; Shi-Min Yuan; Yue-Qiu Tan; Guang-Xiu Lu; Ge Lin; Juan Du
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  A healthy delivery of twins by assisted reproduction followed by preimplantation genetic screening in a woman with X-linked dominant incontinentia pigmenti.

Authors:  Myung Joo Kim; Sang Woo Lyu; Hyun Ha Seok; Ji Eun Park; Sung Han Shim; Tae Ki Yoon
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2014-12-31

7.  Living birth following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders to prevent low-level germline mosaicism related Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome.

Authors:  Jiexue Pan; Jie Li; Songchang Chen; Chenming Xu; Hefeng Huang; Li Jin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.772

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.