Literature DB >> 21323580

Dynamic mass redistribution as a means to measure and differentiate signaling via opioid and cannabinoid receptors.

Ellen E Codd1, John R Mabus, Brian S Murray, Sui-Po Zhang, Christopher M Flores.   

Abstract

Classically, G protein-coupled receptor activation by a ligand has been viewed as producing a defined response such as activation of a G protein, activation or inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, or stimulation of phospholipase C and/or alteration in calcium flux. Newer concepts of ligand-directed signaling recognize that different ligands, ostensibly acting at the same receptors, may induce different downstream effects, complicating the selection of a screening assay. Dynamic mass redistribution (DMR), a label-free technology that uses light to measure ligand-induced changes in the mass of cells proximate to the biosensor, provides an integrated cellular response comprising multiple pathways and cellular events. Using DMR, signals induced by opioid or cannabinoid agonists in cells transfected with these receptors were blocked by pharmacologically appropriate receptor antagonists as well as by pertussis toxin. Differences among compounds in relative potencies at DMR versus ligand-stimulated GTPγS or receptor binding endpoints, suggesting functional selectivity, were observed. Preliminary evidence indicates that inhibitors of intermediate steps in the cell signaling cascade, such as receptor recycling inhibitors, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, or cytoskeletal disruptors, altered or attenuated the cannabinoid-induced response. Notable is the finding that mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitors attenuated signaling induced by the cannabinoid type 2 receptor inverse agonist AM630 but not that stimulated by the agonist CP 55,940. Thus, DMR has the potential to not only identify ligands that activate a given G protein-coupled receptor, but also ascertain the signaling pathways engaged by a specific ligand, making DMR a useful tool in the identification of biased ligands, which may ultimately exhibit improved therapeutic profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21323580     DOI: 10.1089/adt.2010.0347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol        ISSN: 1540-658X            Impact factor:   1.738


  10 in total

1.  Dynamic mass redistribution assays decode surface influence on signaling of endogenous purinergic P2Y receptors.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tran; Haiyan Sun; Ye Fang
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 1.738

2.  Applying label-free dynamic mass redistribution technology to frame signaling of G protein-coupled receptors noninvasively in living cells.

Authors:  Ralf Schröder; Johannes Schmidt; Stefanie Blättermann; Lucas Peters; Nicole Janssen; Manuel Grundmann; Wiebke Seemann; Dorina Kaufel; Nicole Merten; Christel Drewke; Jesus Gomeza; Graeme Milligan; Klaus Mohr; Evi Kostenis
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Approaches for probing allosteric interactions at 7 transmembrane spanning receptors.

Authors:  Michael T Klein; Paige N Vinson; Colleen M Niswender
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.622

4.  Dynamic mass redistribution analysis of endogenous β-adrenergic receptor signaling in neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts.

Authors:  Rhonda L Carter; Laurel A Grisanti; Justine E Yu; Ashley A Repas; Meryl Woodall; Jessica Ibetti; Walter J Koch; Marlene A Jacobson; Douglas G Tilley
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2014-02

5.  A Dynamic Mass Redistribution Assay for the Human Sweet Taste Receptor Uncovers G-Protein Dependent Biased Ligands.

Authors:  Nicole B Servant; Mark E Williams; Paul F Brust; Huixian Tang; Melissa S Wong; Qing Chen; Marketa Lebl-Rinnova; Sara L Adamski-Werner; Catherine Tachdjian; Guy Servant
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and cannabinoid CB2 receptors form functional complexes in cells of the central nervous system: insights into the therapeutic potential of neuronal and microglial NMDA receptors.

Authors:  Rafael Franco; Gemma Navarro; Rafael Rivas-Santisteban; Alejandro Lillo; Jaume Lillo; Joan-Biel Rebassa; Joan S Contestí; Carlos A Saura
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.982

7.  Label-free cell phenotypic study of FFA4 and FFA1 and discovery of novel agonists of FFA4 from natural products.

Authors:  Fangfang Xu; Han Zhou; Xiumei Liu; Xiuli Zhang; Zhiwei Wang; Tao Hou; Jixia Wang; Lala Qu; Pengyu Zhang; Hailong Piao; Xinmiao Liang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Modulation of breast cancer cell viability by a cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist, JWH-015, is calcium dependent.

Authors:  Katherine E Hanlon; Alysia N Lozano-Ondoua; Puja J Umaretiya; Ashley M Symons-Liguori; Anupama Chandramouli; Jamie K Moy; William K Kwass; Patrick W Mantyh; Mark A Nelson; Todd W Vanderah
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2016-04-15

9.  A cationic tetrapyrrole inhibits toxic activities of the cellular prion protein.

Authors:  Tania Massignan; Sara Cimini; Claudia Stincardini; Milica Cerovic; Ilaria Vanni; Saioa R Elezgarai; Jorge Moreno; Matteo Stravalaci; Alessandro Negro; Valeria Sangiovanni; Elena Restelli; Geraldina Riccardi; Marco Gobbi; Joaquín Castilla; Tiziana Borsello; Romolo Nonno; Emiliano Biasini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Parallelized label-free monitoring of cell adhesion on extracellular matrix proteins measured by single colour reflectometry.

Authors:  Johanna Hutterer; Günther Proll; Peter Fechner; Günter Gauglitz
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.142

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.