Literature DB >> 23415091

Approaches for probing allosteric interactions at 7 transmembrane spanning receptors.

Michael T Klein1, Paige N Vinson, Colleen M Niswender.   

Abstract

In recent years, allosteric modulation of 7 transmembrane spanning receptors (7TMRs) has become a highly productive and exciting field of receptor pharmacology and drug discovery efforts. Positive and negative allosteric modulators (PAMs and NAMs, respectively) present a number of pharmacological and therapeutic advantages over conventional orthosteric ligands, including improved receptor-subtype selectivity, a lower propensity to induce receptor desensitization, the preservation of endogenous temporal and spatial activation of receptors, greater chemical flexibility for optimization of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic parameters, and saturability of effect at target receptors, thus improving safety concerns and risk of overdose. Additionally, the relatively new concept of allosteric modulator-mediated receptor signal bias opens up a number of intriguing possibilities for PAMs, NAMs, and allosteric agonists, including the potential to selectively activate therapeutically beneficial signaling cascades, which could yield a superior tissue selectivity and side effect profile of allosteric modulators. However, there are a number of considerations and caveats that must be addressed when screening for and characterizing the properties of 7TMR allosteric modulators. Mode of pharmacology, methodology used to monitor receptor activity, detection of appropriate downstream analytes, selection of orthosteric probe, and assay time-course must all be considered when implementing any high-throughput screening campaign or when characterizing the properties of active compounds. Yet compared to conventional agonist/antagonist drug discovery programs, these elements of assay design are often a great deal more complicated when working with 7TMRs allosteric modulators. Moreover, for classical pharmacological methodologies and analyses, like radioligand binding and the assessment of compound affinity, the properties of allosteric modulators yield data that are more nuanced than orthosteric ligand-receptor interactions. In this review, we discuss the current methodologies being used to identify and characterize allosteric modulators, lending insight into the approaches that have been most successful in accurately and robustly identifying hit compounds. New label-free technologies capable of detecting phenotypic cellular changes in response to receptor activation are powerful tools well suited for assessing subtle or potentially masked cellular responses to allosteric modulation of 7TMRs. Allosteric modulator-induced receptor signal bias and the assay systems available to probe the various downstream signaling outcomes of receptor activation are also discussed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415091      PMCID: PMC5482179          DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394587-7.00001-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci        ISSN: 1877-1173            Impact factor:   3.622


  153 in total

1.  Second extracellular loop of human glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) differentially regulates orthosteric but not allosteric agonist binding and function.

Authors:  Cassandra Koole; Denise Wootten; John Simms; Emilia E Savage; Laurence J Miller; Arthur Christopoulos; Patrick M Sexton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Back to basics: label-free technologies for small molecule screening.

Authors:  Andrew K Shiau; Mark E Massari; Can C Ozbal
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.339

3.  A novel mitochondrial K(ATP) channel assay.

Authors:  Andrew P Wojtovich; David M Williams; Marcin K Karcz; Coeli M B Lopes; Daniel A Gray; Keith W Nehrke; Paul S Brookes
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 4.  The classification of seven transmembrane receptors in recombinant expression systems.

Authors:  T Kenakin
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Phosphodiesterase activation by photoexcited rhodopsin is quenched when rhodopsin is phosphorylated and binds the intrinsic 48-kDa protein of rod outer segments.

Authors:  U Wilden; S W Hall; H Kühn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins and dual control of adenylate cyclase.

Authors:  A G Gilman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  The tetrahydroisoquinoline derivative SB269,652 is an allosteric antagonist at dopamine D3 and D2 receptors.

Authors:  Elena Silvano; Mark J Millan; Clotilde Mannoury la Cour; Yang Han; Lihua Duan; Suzy A Griffin; Robert R Luedtke; Gabriella Aloisi; Mario Rossi; Francesca Zazzeroni; Jonathan A Javitch; Roberto Maggio
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Syntheses and pharmacological characterization of novel thiazole derivatives as potential mGluR5 PET ligands.

Authors:  Cindy A Baumann; Linjing Mu; Nicole Wertli; Stefanie D Krämer; Michael Honer; Pius A Schubiger; Simon M Ametamey
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Allosteric interactions across native adenosine-A3 receptor homodimers: quantification using single-cell ligand-binding kinetics.

Authors:  Lauren T May; Lloyd J Bridge; Leigh A Stoddart; Stephen J Briddon; Stephen J Hill
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Optical biosensor differentiates signaling of endogenous PAR1 and PAR2 in A431 cells.

Authors:  Ye Fang; Ann M Ferrie
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Development of allosteric modulators of GPCRs for treatment of CNS disorders.

Authors:  Hilary Highfield Nickols; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 2.  Intrinsically disordered proteins and proteins with intrinsically disordered regions in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Orkid Coskuner-Weber; Ozan Mirzanli; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Discovery of small molecule positive allosteric modulators of the secretin receptor.

Authors:  Daniela G Dengler; Kaleeckal G Harikumar; Sirkku Pollari; Qing Sun; Brock T Brown; Aki Shinoki-Iwaya; Robert Ardecky; Laurence J Miller; Eduard A Sergienko
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.858

4.  The allosteric modulation of complement C5 by knob domain peptides.

Authors:  Alex Macpherson; Maisem Laabei; Zainab Ahdash; Melissa A Graewert; James R Birtley; Monika-Sarah Ed Schulze; Susan Crennell; Sarah A Robinson; Ben Holmes; Vladas Oleinikovas; Per H Nilsson; James Snowden; Victoria Ellis; Tom Eirik Mollnes; Charlotte M Deane; Dmitri Svergun; Alastair Dg Lawson; Jean Mh van den Elsen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Development of a Testing Funnel for Identification of Small-Molecule Modulators Targeting Secretin Receptors.

Authors:  Daniela G Dengler; Qing Sun; John Holleran; Sirkku Pollari; Jannis Beutel; Brock T Brown; Aki Shinoki Iwaya; Robert Ardecky; Kaleeckal G Harikumar; Laurence J Miller; Eduard A Sergienko
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.341

6.  Allosteric modulation of dopamine D2L receptor in complex with Gi1 and Gi2 proteins: the effect of subtle structural and stereochemical ligand modifications.

Authors:  Justyna Żuk; Damian Bartuzi; Andrea G Silva; Monika Pitucha; Oliwia Koszła; Tomasz M Wróbel; Dariusz Matosiuk; Marián Castro; Agnieszka A Kaczor
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.024

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.