Literature DB >> 21323497

Using patient-centred consultation when screening for depression in elderly patients: a comparative pilot study.

Maria Magnil1, Ronny Gunnarsson, Cecilia Björkelund.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Using validated screening instruments to detect depressive symptoms in the elderly has been recommended. The aim of this study was to compare a patient-centred consultation model with the PRIME-MD screening questionnaire, using the MADRS-S as reference for detecting depressive symptoms in an elderly primary care population.
DESIGN: Comparative study.
SETTING: Primary care, Sweden.
SUBJECTS: During an 11-month period 302 consecutive patients aged 60 and over attending a primary care centre were screened with the PRIME-MD and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-rated version (MADRS-S) instrument. The results were unknown to the GPs who used a structured, patient-centred consultation model comprising seven open-ended "key questions". MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for the PRIME-MD screening questionnaire and the patient-centred consultation model using MADRS-S as reference for possible depression at two cut-off levels with 15% prevalence. Results. Sensitivity was lower for the consultation model than the PRIME-MD screening questionnaire: 78% and 98%, respectively. The GPs failed to identify every fifth patient using the lower cut-off (MADRS-S≥13) but the number of required diagnostic interviews decreased by almost 50%: 85 versus 162, respectively. PPV was 43% and 28%, respectively. Both instruments showed high sensitivity (93%) using the higher cut-off (MADRS-S≥20) and had high NPV: 95% and 99%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the consultation screening procedure might be as useful in everyday practice as the PRIME-MD screening questionnaire. Both screening procedures may also be useful for ruling out depressive symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21323497      PMCID: PMC3347932          DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2011.554011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  36 in total

1.  Questionnaires for depression and anxiety. Systematic review is incomplete.

Authors:  M Pignone; B N Gaynes; K N Lohr; C T Orleans; C Mulrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of depression in late life. Consensus statement update.

Authors:  B D Lebowitz; J L Pearson; L S Schneider; C F Reynolds; G S Alexopoulos; M L Bruce; Y Conwell; I R Katz; B S Meyers; M F Morrison; J Mossey; G Niederehe; P Parmelee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Psychiatric caseness is a marker of major depressive episode in general practice.

Authors:  Søren Dinesen Ostergaard; Leslie Foldager; Christer Allgulander; Alv A Dahl; Marja-Terttu Huuhtanen; Ib Rasmussen; Povl Munk-Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

Authors:  P Svanborg; M Asberg
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  The effect of patient and visit characteristics on diagnosis of depression in primary care.

Authors:  J S Harman; H C Schulberg; B H Mulsant; C F Reynolds
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 6.  Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

7.  The final version of the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS): a new tool to improve consultation outcome and patient participation in general practice patients with complex health problems. Doctors' and patients' evaluation and guidelines for clinical use.

Authors:  Even Laerum; Siri Steine; Morten Finckenhagen; Arnstein Finset
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 8.  Screening and case finding instruments for depression.

Authors:  S Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

Review 9.  Screening accuracy for late-life depression in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lea C Watson; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 10.  Identifying depression in primary care: a literature synthesis of case-finding instruments.

Authors:  John W Williams; Michael Pignone; Gilbert Ramirez; Christina Perez Stellato
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.238

View more
  4 in total

1.  Course, risk factors, and prognostic factors in elderly primary care patients with mild depression: a two-year observational study.

Authors:  Maria Magnil; Lena Janmarker; Ronny Gunnarsson; Cecilia Björkelund
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Comparison Between the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and the Beck Depression Inventory II in Primary Care.

Authors:  Carl Wikberg; Shabnam Nejati; Maria E H Larsson; Eva-Lisa Petersson; Jeanette Westman; Nashmil Ariai; Marie Kivi; Maria Eriksson; Robert Eggertsen; Dominique Hange; Amir Baigi; Cecilia Björkelund
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-06-25

3.  Validation of the Whooley questions and the Beck Depression Inventory in older adults.

Authors:  Kadri Suija; Ulla Rajala; Jari Jokelainen; Timo Liukkonen; Pirjo Härkönen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Markku Timonen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Correspondence Between the Neuropsychiatric Interview M.I.N.I. and the BDI-II and MADRS-S Self-Rating Instruments as Diagnostic Tools in Primary Care Patients with Depression.

Authors:  Shabnam Nejati; Nashmil Ariai; Cecilia Björkelund; Ingmarie Skoglund; Eva-Lisa Petersson; Pia Augustsson; Dominique Hange; Irene Svenningsson
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2020-05-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.