P Svanborg1, M Asberg. 1. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychiatry Section, Karolinska Institute, S171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. par.svanborg@cns.ki.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Beck Depression Inventory BDI is the most often used self-rating instrument for depressive symptoms. In the present study, the BDI was compared with a self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) in 86 psychiatric patients with mainly affective and anxiety disorders. METHODS: The patients were interviewed with the SCID-I Interview for a DSM-IV Major depression, and self-assessed the BDI and the MADRS. They were rated to have either mild, moderate or severe depressive symptomatology. After recovery, criteria for DSM-IV Personality disorders were self-assessed. RESULTS: The instruments were about equal in differentiating between different Axis-I diagnoses and did not differ according to sensitivity to change during antidepressive treatment. Although the scales were highly intercorrelated (r=0.869), the BDI was demonstrated to tap more maladaptive personality traits compared to the MADRS-S. LIMITATIONS: Because the sample consisted of psychiatric patients with prominent psychiatric symptomatology, the discriminative power of the BDI and the MADRS-S should be further evaluated in a sample with milder symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The MADRS-S is equivalent to the BDI as a self-assessment instrument for depression, but the MADRS-S focuses on core depressive symptoms, and is less influenced by maladaptive personality traits.
BACKGROUND: The Beck Depression Inventory BDI is the most often used self-rating instrument for depressive symptoms. In the present study, the BDI was compared with a self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) in 86 psychiatricpatients with mainly affective and anxiety disorders. METHODS: The patients were interviewed with the SCID-I Interview for a DSM-IV Major depression, and self-assessed the BDI and the MADRS. They were rated to have either mild, moderate or severe depressive symptomatology. After recovery, criteria for DSM-IV Personality disorders were self-assessed. RESULTS: The instruments were about equal in differentiating between different Axis-I diagnoses and did not differ according to sensitivity to change during antidepressive treatment. Although the scales were highly intercorrelated (r=0.869), the BDI was demonstrated to tap more maladaptive personality traits compared to the MADRS-S. LIMITATIONS: Because the sample consisted of psychiatricpatients with prominent psychiatric symptomatology, the discriminative power of the BDI and the MADRS-S should be further evaluated in a sample with milder symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The MADRS-S is equivalent to the BDI as a self-assessment instrument for depression, but the MADRS-S focuses on core depressive symptoms, and is less influenced by maladaptive personality traits.
Authors: Patricia H Rosenberger; Kathryn Elizabeth Henderson; Marney A White; Robin M Masheb; Carlos M Grilo Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Lance M Rappaport; Jennifer J Russell; Donald Hedeker; Gilbert Pinard; Pierre Bleau; Debbie S Moskowitz Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Molly L Tanenbaum; Marilyn D Ritholz; Deborah H Binko; Rachel N Baek; M S Erica Shreck; Jeffrey S Gonzalez Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 4.839