Literature DB >> 21323404

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: lumboperitoneal shunts versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts--case series and literature review.

Khalid Abubaker1, Zulfiqar Ali, Kazim Raza, Ciaran Bolger, Daniel Rawluk, Donncha O'Brien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is an uncommon but important cause of headache that can lead to visual loss. This study was undertaken to review our experience in the treatment of IIH by neuronavigation-assisted ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts with programmable valves as compared to lumboperitoneal (LP) shunts.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 25 patients treated for IIH between 2001 and 2009. Age, sex, clinical presentation, methods of treatment and failure rates were recorded.
RESULTS: Seventy-two per cent were treated initially with LP shunts. Failure rate was 11% in this group. Neuronavigation-assisted VP shunts were used to treat 28%. In this group, the failure rate was 14%.
CONCLUSION: Our experience indicates that both LP shunts and VP shuts are effective in controlling all the clinical manifestations of IIH in the immediate postoperative period. Failure rates are slightly higher for VP shunts (14%) than LP shunts (11%). However, revision rates are higher with LP shunts (60%) than with VP shunts (30%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21323404     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2010.544781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  36 in total

1.  Incidence of cerebellar tonsillar ectopia in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a mimic of the Chiari I malformation.

Authors:  A H Aiken; J A Hoots; A M Saindane; P A Hudgins
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Cerebral venous sinus stenting for pseudotumor cerebri: A review.

Authors:  Sivashakthi Kanagalingam; Prem S Subramanian
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-27

Review 3.  Update on the pathophysiology and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Valérie Biousse; Beau B Bruce; Nancy J Newman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Visual Outcomes from Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S J Hickman; N Raoof; H Panesar; J M McMullan; I M Pepper; B Sharrack
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 5.  Pediatric Intracranial Hypertension: a Current Literature Review.

Authors:  Shawn C Aylward; Amanda L Way
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-02-13

Review 6.  High-pressure headaches: idiopathic intracranial hypertension and its mimics.

Authors:  Kuan-Po Peng; Jong-Ling Fuh; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Transverse sinus stenting for pseudotumor cerebri: a cost comparison with CSF shunting.

Authors:  R M Ahmed; F Zmudzki; G D Parker; B K Owler; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Update on the surgical management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Nisha Mukherjee; M Tariq Bhatti
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S R Satti; L Leishangthem; M I Chaudry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  CSF diversion in refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension: single-centre experience and review of efficacy.

Authors:  Georgios Niotakis; Dionysios Grigoratos; Chris Chandler; Danny Morrison; Ming Lim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.