UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of (99m)Tc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetate acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) after intravenous administration in healthy and F98 glioma-bearing F344 rats in the presence of blood-brain barrier disruption (BBB-D) induced by focused ultrasound (FUS). The pharmacokinetics of the healthy and tumor-containing brains after BBB-D were compared to identify the optimal time period for combined treatment. METHODS: Healthy and F98 glioma-bearing rats were injected intravenously with Evans blue (EB) and (99m)Tc-DTPA; these treatments took place with or without BBB-D induced by transcranial FUS of 1 hemisphere of the brain. The permeability of the BBB was quantified by EB extravasation. Twelve rats were scanned for 2 h to estimate uptake of (99m)Tc radioactivity with respect to time for the pharmacokinetic analysis. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed to examine tissue damage. RESULTS: The accumulations of EB and (99m)Tc-DTPA in normal brains or brains with a tumor were significantly elevated after the intravenous injection when BBB-D was induced. The disruption-to-nondisruption ratio of the brains and the tumor-to-ipsilateral brain ratio of the tumors in terms of radioactivity reached a peak at 45 and 60 min, respectively. EB injection followed by sonication showed that there was an increase of about 2-fold in the tumor-to-ipsilateral brain EB ratio of the target tumors (7.36), compared with the control tumors (3.73). TUNEL staining showed no significant differences between the sonicated tumors and control tumors. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that (99m)Tc-DTPA micro-SPECT/CT can be used for the pharmacokinetic analysis of BBB-D induced by FUS. This method should be able to provide important information that will help with establishing an optimal treatment protocol for drug administration after FUS-induced BBB-D in clinical brain disease therapy.
UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of (99m)Tc-diethylenetriamine pentaacetate acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) after intravenous administration in healthy and F98 glioma-bearing F344 rats in the presence of blood-brain barrier disruption (BBB-D) induced by focused ultrasound (FUS). The pharmacokinetics of the healthy and tumor-containing brains after BBB-D were compared to identify the optimal time period for combined treatment. METHODS: Healthy and F98 glioma-bearing rats were injected intravenously with Evans blue (EB) and (99m)Tc-DTPA; these treatments took place with or without BBB-D induced by transcranial FUS of 1 hemisphere of the brain. The permeability of the BBB was quantified by EB extravasation. Twelve rats were scanned for 2 h to estimate uptake of (99m)Tc radioactivity with respect to time for the pharmacokinetic analysis. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed to examine tissue damage. RESULTS: The accumulations of EB and (99m)Tc-DTPA in normal brains or brains with a tumor were significantly elevated after the intravenous injection when BBB-D was induced. The disruption-to-nondisruption ratio of the brains and the tumor-to-ipsilateral brain ratio of the tumors in terms of radioactivity reached a peak at 45 and 60 min, respectively. EB injection followed by sonication showed that there was an increase of about 2-fold in the tumor-to-ipsilateral brain EB ratio of the target tumors (7.36), compared with the control tumors (3.73). TUNEL staining showed no significant differences between the sonicated tumors and control tumors. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that (99m)Tc-DTPA micro-SPECT/CT can be used for the pharmacokinetic analysis of BBB-D induced by FUS. This method should be able to provide important information that will help with establishing an optimal treatment protocol for drug administration after FUS-induced BBB-D in clinical brain disease therapy.
Authors: Sanketh S Moudgalya; Kevin Wilson; Xiaoxia Zhu; Mikalai M Budzevich; Joseph P Walton; Nathan D Cahill; Robert D Frisina; David A Borkholder Journal: Hear Res Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Xiao-Dong Zhang; Huasen Wang; Alexander L Antaris; Lulin Li; Shuo Diao; Rui Ma; Andy Nguyen; Guosong Hong; Zhuoran Ma; Joy Wang; Shoujun Zhu; Joseph M Castellano; Tony Wyss-Coray; Yongye Liang; Jian Luo; Hongjie Dai Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Y L Chen; S Y Wang; R S Liu; H E Wang; J C Chen; S H Chiou; C A Chang; L T Lin; D T W Tan; Y J Lee Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 8.469