OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of different chemotherapeutic agents on biofilm-contaminated titanium surfaces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study used a recently described biofilm model. In experiment 1, Streptococcus mutans biofilms grown on titanium discs were treated with (1) EDTA, (2) citric acid (CA), (3) cetylpyridium chloride, (4) Ardox-X, (5) hydrogen peroxide (H(2) O(2) ), (6) chlorhexidine (CHX) and (7) water. In experiment 2, polymicrobial biofilms were treated with (1) CA, (2) Ardox-X, (3) H(2) O(2) , (4) Ardox-X followed by CA, (5) H(2) O(2) followed by CA, (6) CHX and (7) water. Aliquots of the suspended biofilms were plated and incubated anaerobically to enable counts of the total remaining viable bacteria, which were expressed as CFUs. Following incubation, the amount of protein remaining in the treated S. mutans biofilms was quantified to assess the removal potency of each treatment agent. RESULTS: H(2) O(2) , Ardox-X and CA killed significantly more S. mutans compared with the other treatments. H(2) O(2) and CA removed significantly more protein than water. CA and the combination treatments were significantly more effective against the polymicrobial biofilms than CHX, H(2) O(2) and Ardox-X. The difference in the killing efficacy between CA alone and the combination treatments was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Among the chemicals tested, CA demonstrated the greatest decontamination capacity with respect to both the killing and the removal of biofilm cells. This combination of effects is clinically desirable because it promotes biocompatibility and healing around a previously contaminated implant surface. These results should, however, be validated in in vivo studies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of different chemotherapeutic agents on biofilm-contaminated titanium surfaces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study used a recently described biofilm model. In experiment 1, Streptococcus mutans biofilms grown on titanium discs were treated with (1) EDTA, (2) citric acid (CA), (3) cetylpyridium chloride, (4) Ardox-X, (5) hydrogen peroxide (H(2) O(2) ), (6) chlorhexidine (CHX) and (7) water. In experiment 2, polymicrobial biofilms were treated with (1) CA, (2) Ardox-X, (3) H(2) O(2) , (4) Ardox-X followed by CA, (5) H(2) O(2) followed by CA, (6) CHX and (7) water. Aliquots of the suspended biofilms were plated and incubated anaerobically to enable counts of the total remaining viable bacteria, which were expressed as CFUs. Following incubation, the amount of protein remaining in the treated S. mutans biofilms was quantified to assess the removal potency of each treatment agent. RESULTS:H(2) O(2) , Ardox-X and CA killed significantly more S. mutans compared with the other treatments. H(2) O(2) and CA removed significantly more protein than water. CA and the combination treatments were significantly more effective against the polymicrobial biofilms than CHX, H(2) O(2) and Ardox-X. The difference in the killing efficacy between CA alone and the combination treatments was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Among the chemicals tested, CA demonstrated the greatest decontamination capacity with respect to both the killing and the removal of biofilm cells. This combination of effects is clinically desirable because it promotes biocompatibility and healing around a previously contaminated implant surface. These results should, however, be validated in in vivo studies.
Authors: Fernanda Faot; Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti; Martinna de Mendonça e Bertolini; Luciana de Rezende Pinto; Wander José da Silva; Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Juliana Marotti; Pedro Tortamano; Silvana Cai; Martha Simões Ribeiro; João Eduardo Miranda Franco; Tomie Toyota de Campos Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Mercedes Fernandez y Mostajo; Wil A van der Reijden; Mark J Buijs; Wouter Beertsen; Fridus Van der Weijden; Wim Crielaard; Egija Zaura Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Mercedes Fernandez Y Mostajo; Rob A M Exterkate; Mark J Buijs; Wim Crielaard; Egija Zaura Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.573