Literature DB >> 21319989

Low-cost reusable instrumentation for laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: assessment in a porcine model.

Riccardo Autorino1, Fernando J Kim, Abhay Rane, Marco De Sio, Robert J Stein, Rocco Damiano, Salvatore Micali, Jorge Correia-Pinto, Jihad H Kaouk, Estevão Lima.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test different sets of prebent instruments and a new reusable access device for laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three surgeons with previous experience in LESS performed 12 nephrectomies in six pigs. In all procedures, a multichannel access device (X-CONE) and a 5-mm extra-long telescope were used. Four sets of prebent instruments with different profiles (S-portal) were tested: Standard (one straight scissors and one curved grasper), Cuschieri, Carus, and Leroy set (each of them consisting of two curved instruments with different configurations). Assessment was performed based on both objective (procedure time; time to manage the pedicle; time to free kidney) and subjective parameters (entry/exit of instruments; triangulation; dissection up/down; dissection lateral; retraction; interdependence). The subjective assessment tool used was a Likert type scale (1 = easy to 5 = prohibitive). The access device was assessed by using objective (time to complete insertion of device after skin incision) and subjective (significant air leakage, movement constraint) parameters.
RESULTS: Time to insertion of the X-CONE was <1 minute in all the cases. Surgeons reported significant insufflant leakage in 58% of cases. The procedure was completed in 10/12 (83%) cases. Mean operative time was 8.3 ± 4.2 minutes, being lower for the Carus group (4.5 min) and higher for the standard group (13 min). Among the different sets, the standard one obtained the best mean scores for all subjective parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: X-CONE allows easy abdominal access, and its reusable properties represent cost savings for LESS compared with disposable devices. Prebent instruments might also represent attractive low-cost tools for LESS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21319989     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Performance analysis on physical simulator of four different instrument setups in laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery.

Authors:  Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo; Ana Maria Matos-Azevedo; Francisco Julián Pérez-Duarte; Silvia Enciso; Idoia Díaz-Guëmes Martín-Portugués
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Selection of a port for use in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Rakesh Khanna; Michael A White; Riccardo Autorino; Humberto K Laydner; Wahib Isac; Bo Yang; Fatih Altunrende; Shahab P Hillyer; Gregory Spana; Georges-Pascal Haber; Jihad H Kaouk; Robert J Stein
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  [Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology using reusable systems].

Authors:  C Schwentner; T Todenhöfer; J Seibold; S Alloussi; M Germann; S Aufderklamm; J Mischinger; A Stenzl; G Gakis
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) varicocelectomy with reusable components: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  Frank Friedersdorff; Seven Johannes Aghdassi; Peter Werthemann; Hannes Cash; Irena Goranova; Jonas Felix Busch; Jan Ebbing; Stefan Hinz; Kurt Miller; Joerg Neymeyer; Tom Florian Fuller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for benign urologic disease with a homemade single port device: design and tips for beginners.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Dong Hyuk Kang; Jae Hoon Chung; Jung Ki Jo; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-03-19

6.  Retroperitoneoscopic single site renal biopsy surgery: right indications for the right technique.

Authors:  Salvatore Micali; Alessio Zordani; Riccardo Galli; Eugenio Martorana; Micaela Piccoli; Gianni Cappelli; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between laparoendoscopic single-site and three-portal access.

Authors:  Angelo E Tapia-Araya; Idoia Díaz-Güemes Martin-Portugués; Laura Fresno Bermejo; Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.672

8.  European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Salvador Morales-Conde; Andrea Peeters; Yannick M Meyer; Stavros A Antoniou; Isaías Alarcón Del Agua; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Amir Ben Yehuda; Luigi Boni; Elisa Cassinotti; Giovanni Dapri; Tao Yang; Sofie Fransen; Antonello Forgione; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Michele Mazzola; Marco Migliore; Christof Mittermair; Doris Mittermair; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Andrea Morlacchi; Eran Nizri; Myrthe Nuijts; Jonas Raakow; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Amir Szold; Helmut Weiss; Michael Weiss; Ricardo Zorron; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Cost assessment of instruments for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nadia A Henriksen; Haytham Al-Tayar; Jacob Rosenberg; Lars Nannestad Jorgensen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Cost effective laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a reusable platform.

Authors:  C Schwentner; T Todenhöfer; J Seibold; S Alloussi; S Aufderklamm; J Mischinger; A Stenzl; G Gakis
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.