Literature DB >> 23925023

Cost effective laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a reusable platform.

C Schwentner1, T Todenhöfer, J Seibold, S Alloussi, S Aufderklamm, J Mischinger, A Stenzl, G Gakis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many disposable platforms have been applied in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Besides technical issues, cost is one of the limiting factors for its widespread acceptance. The current study describes the first completely reusable LESS-platform.
METHODS: We performed LESS-procedures in 52 patients including nephrectomy (18), adrenalectomy (2), partial nephrectomy (3), pyeloplasty (4), renal cyst ablation (4), pelvic lymphadenectomy (15), and lymphocele ablation (6). All procedures were conducted using a novel reusable single-port device (X-Cone, Karl-Storz) with a simplified set of instruments. We obtained perioperative and demographic data, including a visual analogue pain scale (VAS), and a complication reporting system based on Clavien grading.
RESULTS: Mean age was 50.04 y. Conversion to standard laparoscopy was necessary in 3 cases and addition of a needlescopic instrument in 6 cases. There was no open conversion. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 3 (Clavien II in 2 and III in 1) cases. Mean operative time was 110, 90, and 89 min, and hospital stay was 4.9, 3.1, and 3.6 d for nephrectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and pyeloplasty, respectively. Mean VAS was 2.13, 1.07, and 1.5 while blood loss was 81.3 mL, 25.67 mL, and 17.5 mL, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 15 (range, 8 to 21).
CONCLUSIONS: A completely reusable LESS-platform is applicable to various uses in urology, yielding favorable functional and cosmetic results. Reusable materials are useful to reduce the cost of LESS, further increasing its acceptance. LESS with a completely reusable platform is more cost effective than standard laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23925023      PMCID: PMC3771796          DOI: 10.4293/108680813X13654754534477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


  34 in total

1.  A prospective randomized comparison of traditional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with needlescopic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in the porcine model.

Authors:  Lesli I Nicolay; Ryan J Bowman; Jonathan P Heldt; Forrest C Jellison; Neda Mehr; Christopher Tenggardjaja; William Millard; Jeffrey L Koning; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Arnold P Advincula; Monish Aron; Jeffrey Caddedu; David Canes; Paul G Curcillo; Mihir M Desai; John C Evanko; Tomasso Falcone; Victor Fazio; Matthew Gettman; Andrew A Gumbs; Georges-Pascal Haber; Jihad H Kaouk; Fernando Kim; Stephanie A King; Jeffrey Ponsky; Feza Remzi; Homero Rivas; Alexander Rosemurgy; Sharona Ross; Philip Schauer; Rene Sotelo; Jose Speranza; John Sweeney; Julio Teixeira
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for renal cancer: technique and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; Domenico Veneziano; Sigrid Wagner; Felix Kawan; Nasreldin Mohammed; M Raschid Hoda; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Xinxiang Fan; Tianxin Lin; Kewei Xu; Zi Yin; Hai Huang; Wen Dong; Jian Huang
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.

Authors:  David Canes; Andre Berger; Monish Aron; Ricardo Brandina; David A Goldfarb; Daniel Shoskes; Mihir M Desai; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Single-access laparoscopic surgery using new curved reusable instruments: initial hundred patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Dapri; Lorenzo Casali; Jean Bruyns; Jacques Himpens; Guy-Bernard Cadiere
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2010-10

7.  Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Karim Bensalah; Aditya Bagrodia; Joshua M Stern; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Cost reductive laparoendoscopic single site surgery endotrainer and animal lab training-our methodology.

Authors:  Manickam Ramalingam; Kallappan Senthil; Anandan Murugesan; M G Pai
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2010-02-18

9.  Technique of laparoscopic-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Giles Hellawell; Minh Do; Tim Haefner; Anja Dietel; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy: initial clinical report.

Authors:  Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; David Canes; Khaled Fareed; Oswaldo Carmona; Georges-Pascal Haber; Sebastien Crouzet; Juan Carlos Astigueta; Roy Lopez; Robert de Andrade; Robert J Stein; James Ulchaker; Rene Sotelo; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

1.  Staging lymphadenectomy in patients with localized high risk prostate cancer: comparison of the laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) technique with conventional multiport laparoscopy.

Authors:  Frank Friedersdorff; Seven Johannes Aghdassi; Ahmed Magheli; Maximilian Richter; Carsten Stephan; Jonas Busch; Dirk Boehmer; Kurt Miller; T Florian Fuller
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.264

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.