Literature DB >> 21319921

The effects of concurrent verbal and visual tasks on category learning.

Sarah J Miles1, John Paul Minda.   

Abstract

Current theories of category learning posit separate verbal and nonverbal learning systems. Past research suggests that the verbal system relies on verbal working memory and executive functioning and learns rule-defined categories; the nonverbal system does not rely on verbal working memory and learns non-rule-defined categories (E. M. Waldron & F. G. Ashby, 2001; D. Zeithamova & W. T. Maddox, 2006). However, relatively little research has explored the importance of visual working memory or visual processing for either system. The authors investigated the role of working memory (Experiment 1a and 1b), visual processing (Experiment 2), and executive functioning for each system, using a concurrent task methodology. It was found that visual tasks with high executive functioning demands and verbal tasks with high or low executive demands disrupted rule-defined learning, whereas any visual task, regardless of executive functioning demand, disrupted non-rule-defined learning. Taken together, these results confirm the importance of verbal working memory and executive functioning for the verbal system and provide new evidence for the importance of visual processing for the nonverbal system. These results help to clarify understanding of the nonverbal system and have implications for multiple systems theories of category learning (F. G. Ashby, L. A. Alfonso-Reese, A. U. Turken, & E. M. Waldron, 1998).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21319921     DOI: 10.1037/a0022309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  Individual differences in learning talker categories: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  Cognitive changes in conjunctive rule-based category learning: An ERP approach.

Authors:  Rahel Rabi; Marc F Joanisse; Tianshu Zhu; John Paul Minda
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Rule-based and information-integration perceptual category learning in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Cynthia L Huang-Pollock; W Todd Maddox; Helen Tam
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; Shirley C Henning; Allison M Ditmars; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2018-07-05

5.  Working-memory load and temporal myopia in dynamic decision making.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; A Ross Otto; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Implicit and explicit category learning by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  J David Smith; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Michael J Beran; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Auditory information-integration category learning in young children and adults.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-08-17

8.  Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  The effect of newly trained verbal and nonverbal labels for the cues in probabilistic category learning.

Authors:  Fotis A Fotiadis; Athanassios Protopapas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

10.  Ego depletion interferes with rule-defined category learning but not non-rule-defined category learning.

Authors:  John P Minda; Rahel Rabi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.