Literature DB >> 21316319

Rapid methods for targeted prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies.

Brigitte H W Faas1, Vincenzo Cirigliano, The-Hung Bui.   

Abstract

Improvements in non-invasive screening methods for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and other aneuploidies during the first and second trimester of pregnancy have radically changed the indications for prenatal diagnosis over the last decade. Consequently, there was a need for rapid tests for the detection of common chromosome aneuploidies resulting in the development of molecular methods for the rapid, targeted detection of (an)euploidies of the chromosomes 13, 18, 21 and the sex chromosomes. The analysis of large series of prenatal samples has shown that such tests can detect the great majority of chromosome abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis. This resulted in lively discussions on whether conventional karyotyping should remain the standard method for the majority of prenatal cases or can be replaced by rapid tests only. This review gives an overview of different aspects of the three most common tests for rapid, targeted prenatal detection of (an)euploidies, i.e. interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (iFISH), quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21316319     DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2011.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1744-165X            Impact factor:   3.926


  17 in total

1.  Genetic polymorphisms of short tandem repeat loci D13S305, D13S631 and D13S634 in the Han population of Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Yunfang Shi; Xiaozhou Li; Duan Ju; Yan Li; Xiuling Zhang; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  The combined QF-PCR and cytogenetic approach in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Akin Tekcan; Sengul Tural; Mehmet Elbistan; Nurten Kara; Davut Guven; Idris Kocak
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  BACs-on-Beads™ assay, a rapid aneuploidy test, improves the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping.

Authors:  Chantal Farra; Anwar H Nassar; Fadi Mirza; Lina Abdouni; Mirna Souaid; Johnny Awwad
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  The scope of prenatal diagnosis for women at increased risk for aneuploidies: views and preferences of professionals and potential users.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Anja Krumeich; Julie Boonekamp; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-11-09

7.  Development and validation of a novel 26-plex system for prenatal diagnosis with forensic markers.

Authors:  Mingkun Xie; Jienan Li; Huan Hu; Panpan Wang; Xueqi Cong; Jingzhi Li; Lei Dai; Yang Lu; Weishe Zhang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Rapid and non invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  S Madjunkova; E Sukarova-Stefanovska; S Kocheva; I Maleva; P Noveski; S Kiprijanovska; K Stankova; P Dimcev; M Madjunkov; D Plaseska-Karanfilska
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.519

9.  Biomarker development for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: predictive reliability and potential clinical application.

Authors:  Aggeliki Kolialexi; Athanasios K Anagnostopoulos; Georgia Tounta; Aris Antsaklis; Ariadni Mavrou; George Th Tsangaris
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Women's Attitudes towards the Option to Choose between Karyotyping and Rapid Targeted Testing during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Dominique F C M Smeets; Ilse Feenstra; Lia D E Wijnberger; Robbert J P Rijnders; Rik W P Quartero; Peter F Boekkooi; John M G van Vugt; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.