Literature DB >> 21316307

Genome-wide analysis shows no genomic predictors of ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous FSH for IVF.

Jeroen van Disseldorp1, Lude Franke, Rene Eijkemans, Frank Broekmans, Nick Macklon, Cisca Wijmenga, Bart Fauser.   

Abstract

The current proof of principle study explores the possibility that a genetic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profile is associated with ovarian response to standardized stimulation for IVF using exogenous FSH. Such a pharmacogenomic approach could aid in rendering ovarian stimulation for IVF more tailored to the patient, potentially improving the delicate balance between efficacy, side effects and chances for complications. Genome-wide association (GWA) analysis using Illumina Human 610-Quad BeadChips was used in a homogeneous group of 102 healthy, Caucasian, regularly cycling, non-smoking women aged 38 years or less with a body mass index <30 kg/m² with a regular indication for IVF in a tertiary referral University Hospital. Genetic profiles were associated with the number of oocytes obtained. Ovarian response varied widely, ranging from cancellation (less than three follicles) to more than 20 oocytes. After correction for multiple testing, no SNPs were observed to be significantly correlated to ovarian response, embryo quality or pregnancy. Restricting the information to SNPs involved in granulosa cell function, cell cycle regulation or apoptosis also did not yield significant associations for ovarian response. A study in a larger cohort is warranted, aiming to further explore subtle genetic variants with greater power.
Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21316307     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

1.  A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian women.

Authors:  Amanda Souza Setti; Sylvia Sanches Cortezzi; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Ciro Dresch Martinhago; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Do estrogen receptor alpha polymorphisms have any impact on the outcome in an ART program?

Authors:  Elli Anagnostou; Fotodotis Malamas; Despina Mavrogianni; Vasiliki Dinopoulou; Peter Drakakis; Konstantinos Kallianidis; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Ovarian Physiology and GWAS: Biobanks, Biology, and Beyond.

Authors:  Triin Laisk-Podar; Cecilia M Lindgren; Maire Peters; Juha S Tapanainen; Cornelis B Lambalk; Andres Salumets; Reedik Mägi
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 12.015

4.  Evaluating influence of the genotypes in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Ser680Asn (rs6166) polymorphism on poor and hyper-responders to ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noel Pabalan; Camila Martins Trevisan; Carla Peluso; Hamdi Jarjanazi; Denise Maria Christofolini; Caio Parente Barbosa; Bianca Bianco
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  Variant-beta luteinizing hormone is not associated with poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Hans I Hanevik; Hilde T Hilmarsen; Camilla F Skjelbred; Tom Tanbo; Jarl A Kahn
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.