Literature DB >> 21316012

Sex differences in conscious sedation during upper gastrointestinal panendoscopic examination.

Yu-Hsuan Yen1, Tzu-Fu Lin, Chen-Jung Lin, Yi-Chia Lee, Hon-Ping Lau, Huei-Ming Yeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Sex differences in response to noxious stimuli or analgesia have been demonstrated. We investigated sex differences in conscious sedation during upper gastrointestinal panendoscopic examination with regard to drug dose and entropy scores.
METHODS: We investigated sex differences in 30 men and 30 women who were undergoing conscious sedation during upper gastrointestinal panendoscopic examination. The drug mixture was prepared as 5 mg midazolam plus 1 mg alfentanil diluted with normal saline to a volume of 10 mL. An initial injection of 4 mL was followed by an additional 1 mL every 1 minute, until the modified Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAAS) rating scale was ≤ 3 when the panendoscope was inserted. Further injection was allowed thereafter. Entropy values, including state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE), were monitored from baseline to full recovery.
RESULTS: The volume of mixture needed to achieve an OAAS score of ≤ 3 was significantly lower in men than in women (4.4 ± 0.7 mL vs. 4.8 ± 0.8 mL, p = 0.034). The initial drug demand was not significantly influenced by age, body weight, or body height. The RE and SE values at the time of panendoscope insertion were not significantly different between men and women. The total volume for men was also significantly lower than that for women (5.7 ± 1.1 mL vs. 6.5 ± 1.4 mL, p < 0.01). The lowest RE and SE values during the procedure were not significantly different between men and women.
CONCLUSION: Women need more analgesic agents than men during panendoscopic examination. There was no significant difference between men and women with regard to anesthetic depth and response to noxious stimuli, as revealed by similar SE and RE values.
Copyright © 2011 Formosan Medical Association & Elsevier. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21316012     DOI: 10.1016/S0929-6646(11)60007-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  3 in total

1.  Review on sedation for gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in children by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Rok Orel; Jernej Brecelj; Jorge Amil Dias; Claudio Romano; Fernanda Barros; Mike Thomson; Yvan Vandenplas
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25

2.  Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ryan E Childers; J Lucas Williams; Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Variables Influencing the Depth of Conscious Sedation in Plastic Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hyeonjung Yeo; Wonwoo Kim; Hyochun Park; Hoonnam Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.