Literature DB >> 21315414

Biomarker expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: potential progression predictive factors for low-grade lesions.

Satoru Ozaki1, Yoh Zen, Masaki Inoue.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reveal whether 3 biomarkers (p16INK4a, ProEx C, and human papilloma virus DNA) are useful in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and whether they could predict disease progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-1. We analyzed 252 cervical specimens: nondysplastic mucosa (n = 9), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 229), and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 14). Immunostaining for p16INK4a and ProEx C, and the hybridcapture II assay for human papilloma virus DNA were performed. Expression of p16INK4a and staining for ProEx C were significantly higher in intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 (96%-100%) than in nondysplastic mucosa (11%) or intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (40%-53%). Human papilloma virus DNA was detected in 69% of intraepithelial neoplasia-1, 95% of intraepithelial neoplasia-2, and 100% of intraepithelial neoplasia 3. Of 99 patients with intraepithelial neoplasia 1 for whom follow-up data was available, 62 (73%) showed spontaneous regression, 17 (20%) demonstrated persistent low-grade lesion, and 7 (7%) progressed to intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3. Expressions of p16INK4a and staining with ProEx C were significantly higher in the progression group than in the regression group. Testing for p16INK4a and ProEx C was sensitive (86%) and moderately specific (60% and 61%, respectively) in predicting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1. Human papilloma virus DNA testing was highly sensitive (100%) but less specific (37%). In conclusion, this study revealed that p16INK4a and ProEx C are useful biomarkers for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and have potential as predictors of progression of low-grade lesions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21315414     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  13 in total

Review 1.  Replication proteins and human disease.

Authors:  Andrew P Jackson; Ronald A Laskey; Nicholas Coleman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Revised terminology for cervical histopathology and its implications for management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.

Authors:  Alan G Waxman; David Chelmow; Teresa M Darragh; Herschel Lawson; Anna-Barbara Moscicki
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  TMEM45A, SERPINB5 and p16INK4A transcript levels are predictive for development of high-grade cervical lesions.

Authors:  Anna Manawapat-Klopfer; Louise T Thomsen; Peter Martus; Christian Munk; Rainer Russ; Hans Gmuender; Kirsten Frederiksen; Juliane Haedicke-Jarboui; Frank Stubenrauch; Susanne K Kjaer; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Biomarker P16 predicts progression risk of anal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Yuxin Liu; Morgan Blakely; Keith Sigel; Tin Htwe Thin; Pei Hui; Michael Donovan; Michael M Gaisa
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  p16 staining has limited value in predicting the outcome of histological low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.

Authors:  Amaia Sagasta; Paola Castillo; Adela Saco; Aureli Torné; Roser Esteve; Lorena Marimon; Jaume Ordi; Marta Del Pino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  p16ink4 and cytokeratin 7 immunostaining in predicting HSIL outcome for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a case series, literature review and commentary.

Authors:  Eric C Huang; Mary M Tomic; Suchanan Hanamornroongruang; Emily E Meserve; Michael Herfs; Christopher P Crum
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  New strategies for human papillomavirus-based cervical screening.

Authors:  Attila Lorincz; Alejandra Castanon; Anita Wey Wey Lim; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2013-09

8.  Role of protein biomarkers in the detection of high-grade disease in cervical cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Charlotte A Brown; Johnannes Bogers; Shaira Sahebali; Christophe E Depuydt; Frans De Prins; Douglas P Malinowski
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 9.  Influence of Human Papillomavirus Infection on the Natural History of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mingzhu Liu; Xiaolong Yan; Mei Zhang; Xiaoju Li; Shugang Li; Mingxia Jing
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry is a promising biomarker to predict the outcome of low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: comparison study with HPV genotyping.

Authors:  Sakiko Nishio; Takuma Fujii; Hiroshi Nishio; Kaori Kameyama; Miyuki Saito; Takashi Iwata; Kaneyuki Kubushiro; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.