INTRODUCTION: In pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT), a bifunctional antibody is administered and allowed to pre-localize to tumor cells. Subsequently, a chelated radionuclide is administered and captured by cell-bound antibody while unbound hapten clears rapidly from the body. We aim to engineer high-affinity binders to 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) chelates for use in PRIT applications. METHODS: We mathematically modeled antibody and hapten pharmacokinetics to analyze hapten tumor retention as a function of hapten binding affinity. Motivated by model predictions, we used directed evolution and yeast surface display to affinity mature the 2D12.5 antibody to DOTA, reformatted as a single chain variable fragment (scFv). RESULTS: Modeling predicts that for high antigen density and saturating bsAb dose, a hapten-binding affinity of 100 pM is needed for near-maximal hapten retention. We affinity matured 2D12.5 with an initial binding constant of about 10 nM to DOTA-yttrium chelates. Affinity maturation resulted in a 1000-fold affinity improvement to biotinylated DOTA-yttrium, yielding an 8.2±1.9 picomolar binder. The high-affinity scFv binds DOTA complexes of lutetium and gadolinium with similar picomolar affinity and indium chelates with low nanomolar affinity. When engineered into a bispecific antibody construct targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, pretargeted high-affinity scFv results in significantly higher tumor retention of a (111)In-DOTA hapten compared to pretargeted wild-type scFv in a xenograft mouse model. CONCLUSIONS: We have engineered a versatile, high-affinity, DOTA-chelate-binding scFv. We anticipate it will prove useful in developing pretargeted imaging and therapy protocols to exploit the potential of a variety of radiometals.
INTRODUCTION: In pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT), a bifunctional antibody is administered and allowed to pre-localize to n class="Disease">tumor cells. Subsequently, a chelated radionuclide is administered and captured by cell-bound antibody while unbound hapten clears rapidly from the body. We aim to engineer high-affinity binders to 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) chelates for use in PRIT applications. METHODS: We mathematically modeled antibody and hapten pharmacokinetics to analyze hapten tumor retention as a function of hapten binding affinity. Motivated by model predictions, we used directed evolution and yeast surface display to affinity mature the 2D12.5 antibody to DOTA, reformatted as a single chain variable fragment (scFv). RESULTS: Modeling predicts that for high antigen density and saturating bsAb dose, a hapten-binding affinity of 100 pM is needed for near-maximal hapten retention. We affinity matured 2D12.5 with an initial binding constant of about 10 nM to DOTA-yttrium chelates. Affinity maturation resulted in a 1000-fold affinity improvement to biotinylated DOTA-yttrium, yielding an 8.2±1.9 picomolar binder. The high-affinity scFv binds DOTA complexes of lutetium and gadolinium with similar picomolar affinity and indium chelates with low nanomolar affinity. When engineered into a bispecific antibody construct targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, pretargeted high-affinity scFv results in significantly higher tumor retention of a (111)In-DOTA hapten compared to pretargeted wild-type scFv in a xenograft mouse model. CONCLUSIONS: We have engineered a versatile, high-affinity, DOTA-chelate-binding scFv. We anticipate it will prove useful in developing pretargeted imaging and therapy protocols to exploit the potential of a variety of radiometals.
Authors: R A Love; J E Villafranca; R M Aust; K K Nakamura; R A Jue; J G Major; R Radhakrishnan; W F Butler Journal: Biochemistry Date: 1993-10-19 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: D B Axworthy; J M Reno; M D Hylarides; R W Mallett; L J Theodore; L M Gustavson; F Su; L J Hobson; P L Beaumier; A R Fritzberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L B Shih; S R Thorpe; G L Griffiths; H Diril; G L Ong; H J Hansen; D M Goldenberg; M J Mattes Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Joshua M Donaldson; Cindy Zer; Kendra N Avery; Krzysztof P Bzymek; David A Horne; John C Williams Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sarah M Cheal; Edward K Fung; Mitesh Patel; Hong Xu; Hong-Fen Guo; Pat B Zanzonico; Sebastien Monette; K Dane Wittrup; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Steven M Larson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Paul J Yazaki; Brian Lee; Divya Channappa; Chia-Wei Cheung; Desiree Crow; Junie Chea; Erasmus Poku; Lin Li; Jan Terje Andersen; Inger Sandlie; Kelly Davis Orcutt; K Dane Wittrup; John E Shively; Andrew Raubitschek; David Colcher Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Damian J Green; Shani L Frayo; Yukang Lin; Donald K Hamlin; Darrell R Fisher; Sofia H L Frost; Aimee L Kenoyer; Mark D Hylarides; Ajay K Gopal; Theodore A Gooley; Johnnie J Orozco; Brian G Till; Shyril O'Steen; Kelly D Orcutt; D Scott Wilbur; K Dane Wittrup; Oliver W Press Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Sally M Hull; Kimberly S Samkoe; Jason Gunn; Jack Hoopes; David W Roberts; Theresa V Strong; Daniel Draney; Joachim Feldwisch Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2015-03-04
Authors: Sarah M Cheal; Hong Xu; Hong-Fen Guo; Sang-Gyu Lee; Blesida Punzalan; Sandhya Chalasani; Edward K Fung; Achim Jungbluth; Pat B Zanzonico; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Joseph O'Donoghue; Peter M Smith-Jones; K Dane Wittrup; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Steven M Larson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 9.236