Literature DB >> 21314343

Outback catheter for femoropopliteal occlusions: immediate and long-term results.

Yvonne Bausback1, Spiridon Botsios, Jacqueline Flux, Martin Werner, Johannes Schuster, Jairam Aithal, Ramon Varcoe, Sven Bräunlich, Matthias Ulrich, Dierk Scheinert, Andrej Schmidt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a retrospective, single-center study that evaluates technical and clinical outcomes from subintimal recanalization of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTO) facilitated by the Outback re-entry catheter.
METHODS: The Outback catheter was required to complete recanalization of femoropopliteal CTOs (mean lesion length 195 ± 91 mm) in 118 limbs of 113 patients (77 men; mean age 70 ± 10 years). In 80/118 (67.8%) limbs, treatment was performed for claudication and in the remaining 38 (32.2%) for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Technical and procedural success, clinical outcome, and cumulative patency rates in follow-up were evaluated.
RESULTS: Re-entry was accomplished in 108/118 limbs (91.5%) with recanalization completed in 107/118 (90.7%). Of these, only 61/107 (57%) arteries were left with a residual stenosis <30%. Complications included minor bleeding of the target vessel (5/118, 4.2%) and minor hematoma/pseudoaneurysm at the access site (6/118, 5.1%). Acute reocclusion developed in 2/118 cases (1.7%) without major complication. After 12 months, primary patency was 56.7%, assisted primary patency 83.1%, and secondary patency 89.1%. Primary patency was significantly reduced in limbs with residual stenosis. Over a median 15-month follow-up (range 2-32), 4 major and 2 minor amputations were performed in patients with CLI.
CONCLUSION: The Outback catheter is a reliable tool to recanalize challenging chronic femoropopliteal occlusions after failed guidewire re-entry. Restenosis rates are high, which may be due to the severity and extent of disease in these patients, who are particularly challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21314343     DOI: 10.1583/10-3248.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Subintimal recanalization. Indications, technique and results].

Authors:  B Radeleff; M Sumkauskaite; N Kortes; D Gnutzmann; T Mokry; H U Kauczor; U Stampfl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Percutaneous versus surgical management of lower extremity peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Amit M Kakkar; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Peripheral arterial calcification: prevalence, mechanism, detection, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Krishna J Rocha-Singh; Thomas Zeller; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The "needle re-entry" technique for infrainguinal arterial calcified occlusive lesions.

Authors:  Takuya Haraguchi; Yoshifumi Kashima; Masanaga Tsujimoto; Tomohiko Watanabe; Hidemasa Shitan; Takuro Sugie; Daisuke Hachinohe; Umihiko Kaneko; Ken Kobayashi; Daitaro Kanno; Katsuhiko Sato; Tsutomu Fujita
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2021-12-11

5.  Comparison of the OUTBACK® Elite Reentry Catheter and the Bi-directional Approach after Failed Antegrade Approach for Femoro-popliteal Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  Daizo Kawasaki; Masashi Fukunaga; Tsuyoshi Nakata; Masaaki Kato; Nobukazu Ohkubo
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.928

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.