B Radeleff1, M Sumkauskaite2, N Kortes2, D Gnutzmann2, T Mokry2, H U Kauczor2, U Stampfl2. 1. Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Boris.Radeleff@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: This article gives an overview of the current importance of so-called subintimal recanalization in the lower extremities. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: The primary technical goal of endovascular interventions in the lower extremities is the endoluminal restoration of blood circulation from the iliac arteries into the feet. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: If endoluminal recanalization of e.g. high-grade flow-relevant stenoses or chronic total occlusion (CTO) is technically not possible, subintimal recanalization is a promising option and the only remaining minimally invasive alternative. During subintimal recanalization a channel is intentionally generated in the vessel wall (dissection) in order to bypass e. g. a chronic vascular occlusion over as short a distance as possible. PERFORMANCE: The technical success rate for subintimal recanalization of CTO of the lower extremities is 65-100 %. Technical failure occurs in approximately 25 % using the catheter and wire technique and is caused in most cases by difficulties in reaching the true lumen after the subintimal passage (the so-called re-entry). ACHIEVEMENTS: Compared to conventional subintimal recanalization, in recent years so-called re-entry devices have expanded the technical possibilities and depending on the medical experience and training level of the physician, provide an improvement in the technical success rate, a lower complication rate, a reduction of fluoroscopy time and the amount of necessary contrast medium but also result in higher costs. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Subintimal recanalization, whether carried out conventionally with a catheter and wire or using re-entry devices, of high-grade stenoses or CTO in the lower extremities provides a high technical success rate but requires an experienced and trained physician who is capable of operating the elaborate materials and mastering any possible complications.
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: This article gives an overview of the current importance of so-called subintimal recanalization in the lower extremities. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: The primary technical goal of endovascular interventions in the lower extremities is the endoluminal restoration of blood circulation from the iliac arteries into the feet. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: If endoluminal recanalization of e.g. high-grade flow-relevant stenoses or chronic total occlusion (CTO) is technically not possible, subintimal recanalization is a promising option and the only remaining minimally invasive alternative. During subintimal recanalization a channel is intentionally generated in the vessel wall (dissection) in order to bypass e. g. a chronic vascular occlusion over as short a distance as possible. PERFORMANCE: The technical success rate for subintimal recanalization of CTO of the lower extremities is 65-100 %. Technical failure occurs in approximately 25 % using the catheter and wire technique and is caused in most cases by difficulties in reaching the true lumen after the subintimal passage (the so-called re-entry). ACHIEVEMENTS: Compared to conventional subintimal recanalization, in recent years so-called re-entry devices have expanded the technical possibilities and depending on the medical experience and training level of the physician, provide an improvement in the technical success rate, a lower complication rate, a reduction of fluoroscopy time and the amount of necessary contrast medium but also result in higher costs. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Subintimal recanalization, whether carried out conventionally with a catheter and wire or using re-entry devices, of high-grade stenoses or CTO in the lower extremities provides a high technical success rate but requires an experienced and trained physician who is capable of operating the elaborate materials and mastering any possible complications.
Authors: M Bosiers; K Deloose; J Callaert; L Maene; K Keirse; J Verbist; P Peeters Journal: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.888
Authors: Donald L Jacobs; Raghunandan L Motaganahalli; Daniel E Cox; Catherine M Wittgen; Gary J Peterson Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Susanna H Shin; Donald Baril; Rabih Chaer; Robert Rhee; Michel Makaroun; Luke Marone Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Marcello Romiti; Maximiano Albers; Francisco Cardoso Brochado-Neto; Anai Espinelli S Durazzo; Carlos Alberto Bragança Pereira; Nelson De Luccia Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 4.268