Literature DB >> 21312329

Quality improvement projects targeting health care-associated infections: comparing Virtual Collaborative and Toolkit approaches.

Theodore Speroff1, E Wes Ely, Robert Greevy, Matthew B Weinger, Thomas R Talbot, Richard J Wall, Jayant K Deshpande, Daniel J France, Sam Nwosu, Hayley Burgess, Jane Englebright, Mark V Williams, Robert S Dittus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Collaborative and toolkit approaches have gained traction for improving quality in health care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a quality improvement virtual collaborative intervention would perform better than a toolkit-only approach at preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAPs). DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cluster randomized trial with the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of 60 hospitals assigned to the Toolkit (n=29) or Virtual Collaborative (n=31) group from January 2006 through September 2007. MEASUREMENT: CLABSI and VAP rates. Follow-up survey on improvement interventions, toolkit utilization, and strategies for implementing improvement.
RESULTS: A total of 83% of the Collaborative ICUs implemented all CLABSI interventions compared to 64% of those in the Toolkit group (P = 0.13), implemented daily catheter reviews more often (P = 0.04), and began this intervention sooner (P < 0.01). Eighty-six percent of the Collaborative group implemented the VAP bundle compared to 64% of the Toolkit group (P = 0.06). The CLABSI rate was 2.42 infections per 1000 catheter days at baseline and 2.73 at 18 months (P = 0.59). The VAP rate was 3.97 per 1000 ventilator days at baseline and 4.61 at 18 months (P = 0.50). Neither group improved outcomes over time; there was no differential performance between the 2 groups for either CLABSI rates (P = 0.71) or VAP rates (P = 0.80).
CONCLUSION: The intensive collaborative approach outpaced the simpler toolkit approach in changing processes of care, but neither approach improved outcomes. Incorporating quality improvement methods, such as ICU checklists, into routine care processes is complex, highly context-dependent, and may take longer than 18 months to achieve.
Copyright © 2011 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21312329     DOI: 10.1002/jhm.873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  8 in total

1.  Multimethod evaluation of the VA's peer-to-peer Toolkit for patient-centered medical home implementation.

Authors:  Jeff Luck; Candice Bowman; Laura York; Amanda Midboe; Thomas Taylor; Randall Gale; Steven Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four-year journey after completing a virtual learning program.

Authors:  Claire H Robinson; Amy J Thompto; Elizabeth N Lima; Laura J Damschroder
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2022-09-27

Review 3.  The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet Yamada; Allyson Shorkey; Melanie Barwick; Kimberley Widger; Bonnie J Stevens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Reducing the rare event: lessons from the implementation of a ventilator bundle.

Authors:  Maryanne Matinee Chumpia; David A Ganz; Evelyn T Chang; Shelly S de Peralta
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-06-12

5.  Incidence of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Evaluation of Bundle Prevention in Two Intensive Care Units in Central Brazil.

Authors:  Thais Yoshida; Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo Silva; Luciana Leite Pineli Simões; Rafael Alves Guimarães
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2019-10-07

6.  The LEAP Program: Quality Improvement Training to Address Team Readiness Gaps Identified by Implementation Science Findings.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Nicholas R Yankey; Claire H Robinson; Michelle B Freitag; Jennifer A Burns; Susan D Raffa; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing Virtual Learning Collaborative and Technical Assistance strategies to implement an early palliative care program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a study protocol.

Authors:  Supriya Mohile; Marie Anne Bakitas; Lisa Zubkoff; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Gregory Hagley; Maria Pisu; Andres Azuero; Marie Flannery; Richard Taylor; Elizabeth Carpenter-Song
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Adaptation of the Grasha Riechman Student Learning Style Survey and Teaching Style Inventory to assess individual teaching and learning styles in a quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  James H Ford; James M Robinson; Meg E Wise
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.