Supriya Mohile1, Marie Anne Bakitas2,3,4, Lisa Zubkoff5,6, Kathleen Doyle Lyons7,8, J Nicholas Dionne-Odom2,3,4, Gregory Hagley7, Maria Pisu9,4, Andres Azuero9,2,3, Marie Flannery1, Richard Taylor2,3, Elizabeth Carpenter-Song10. 1. University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. 2. School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, UAB Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. 5. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. lisazubkoff@uabmc.edu. 6. Birmingham/Atlanta VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, AL, USA. lisazubkoff@uabmc.edu. 7. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 8. Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA. 9. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 10. Department of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Virtual Learning Collaboratives (VLC), learning communities focused on a common purpose, are used frequently in healthcare settings to implement best practices. Yet, there is limited research testing the effectiveness of this approach compared to other implementation strategies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a VLC compared to Technical Assistance (TA) among community oncology practices implementing ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends), an evidence-based, early palliative care telehealth, psycho-educational intervention for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their caregivers. METHODS: Using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Frameworks, this two-arm hybrid type-III cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare two implementation strategies, VLC versus TA, among the 48 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice clusters that have not historically provided palliative care to all patients with advanced cancer. Three cohorts of practice clusters will be randomized to the study arms. Each practice cluster will recruit 15-27 patients and a family caregiver to participate in ENABLE. The primary study outcome is ENABLE uptake (patient level), i.e., the proportion of eligible patients who complete the ENABLE program (receive a palliative care assessment and complete the six ENABLE sessions over 12 weeks). The secondary outcome is overall program implementation (practice cluster level), as measured by the General Organizational Index at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory aims assess patient and caregiver mood and quality of life outcomes at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. Practice cluster randomization will seek to keep the proportion of rural practices, practice sizes, and minority patients seen within each practice balanced across the two study arms. DISCUSSION: This study will advance the field of implementation science by evaluating VLC effectiveness, a commonly used but understudied, implementation strategy. The study will advance the field of palliative care by building the capacity and infrastructure to implement an early palliative care program in community oncology practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov . NCT04062552; Pre-results. Registered: August 20, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04062552?term=NCT04062552&draw=2&rank=1.
BACKGROUND: Virtual Learning Collaboratives (VLC), learning communities focused on a common purpose, are used frequently in healthcare settings to implement best practices. Yet, there is limited research testing the effectiveness of this approach compared to other implementation strategies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a VLC compared to Technical Assistance (TA) among community oncology practices implementing ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends), an evidence-based, early palliative care telehealth, psycho-educational intervention for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their caregivers. METHODS: Using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Frameworks, this two-arm hybrid type-III cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare two implementation strategies, VLC versus TA, among the 48 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice clusters that have not historically provided palliative care to all patients with advanced cancer. Three cohorts of practice clusters will be randomized to the study arms. Each practice cluster will recruit 15-27 patients and a family caregiver to participate in ENABLE. The primary study outcome is ENABLE uptake (patient level), i.e., the proportion of eligible patients who complete the ENABLE program (receive a palliative care assessment and complete the six ENABLE sessions over 12 weeks). The secondary outcome is overall program implementation (practice cluster level), as measured by the General Organizational Index at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory aims assess patient and caregiver mood and quality of life outcomes at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. Practice cluster randomization will seek to keep the proportion of rural practices, practice sizes, and minority patients seen within each practice balanced across the two study arms. DISCUSSION: This study will advance the field of implementation science by evaluating VLC effectiveness, a commonly used but understudied, implementation strategy. The study will advance the field of palliative care by building the capacity and infrastructure to implement an early palliative care program in community oncology practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov . NCT04062552; Pre-results. Registered: August 20, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04062552?term=NCT04062552&draw=2&rank=1.
Authors: Gregory J McHugo; Robert E Drake; Rob Whitley; Gary R Bond; Kikuko Campbell; Charles A Rapp; Howard H Goldman; Wilma J Lutz; Molly T Finnerty Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Lisa Zubkoff; Julia Neily; Beth J King; Mary Ellen Dellefield; Sarah Krein; Yinong Young-Xu; Shoshana Boar; Peter D Mills Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2016-11-09
Authors: Sarah M Chilenski; Daniel F Perkins; Jonathan Olson; Lesa Hoffman; Mark E Feinberg; Mark Greenberg; Janet Welsh; D Max Crowley; Richard Spoth Journal: Eval Program Plann Date: 2015-10-08
Authors: Marie A Bakitas; Tor D Tosteson; Zhigang Li; Kathleen D Lyons; Jay G Hull; Zhongze Li; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Jennifer Frost; Konstantin H Dragnev; Mark T Hegel; Andres Azuero; Tim A Ahles Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Erin E Kent; Sandra A Mitchell; Kathleen M Castro; Darren A DeWalt; Arnold D Kaluzny; Judith A Hautala; Oren Grad; Rachel M Ballard; Worta J McCaskill-Stevens; Barnett S Kramer; Steven B Clauser Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ruth C Carlos; JoRean D Sicks; George J Chang; Alan P Lyss; Teresa L Stewart; Lillian Sung; Kathryn E Weaver Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; Tannaz Moin; Santanu K Datta; Caitlin M Reardon; Nanette Steinle; Jane Weinreb; Charles J Billington; Matt L Maciejewski; William S Yancy; Maria Hughes; Fatima Makki; Caroline R Richardson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: David A Smelson; Matthew Chinman; Sharon McCarthy; Gordon Hannah; Leon Sawh; Mark Glickman Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Marie Bakitas; Mark T Hegel; Brett Hanscom; Jay Hull; Tim A Ahles Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jafar Bakhshaie; James Doorley; Mira Reichman; Ryan Mace; David Laverty; Paul E Matuszewski; A Rani Elwy; Amirreza Fatehi; Lucy C Bowers; Thuan Ly; Ana-Maria Vranceanu Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Grace Meijuan Yang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Yi Han Foo; Ariel Hui Mei Chung; Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal; Laurence Tan; Chou Chuen Yu; Le Mai Khanh; Audrey Rui Xuan Koh; Irene Teo; Sungwon Yoon; Marie Bakitas Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.234