Literature DB >> 21311614

Utility of a three-dimensional endoscopic system in skull base surgery.

Oshri Wasserzug1, Nevo Margalit, Noam Weizman, Dan M Fliss, Ziv Gil.   

Abstract

We evaluated the utility of a three-dimensional (3-D) endoscopic system for skull base surgery. We performed a retrospective case series in a tertiary care medical center. Thirty-six patients underwent skull base (nonpituitary) resections via 3-D endoscopic system. Fifteen patients (42%) were operated for excision of malignant tumors, 19 (53%) for excision of benign lesions, and 3 (8.3%) for skull base reconstruction. The tumors involved the cribriform plate (n = 13), sphenoid sinus and planum (n = 17), clivus (n = 7), and sella (n = 7). Complete tumor resection was achieved in 31 patients and subtotal resection in two. Five patients (14%) had postoperative complications. There was one case of meningitis, and there were no cases of cerebrospinal fluid leak. The surgeon's ability to recognize anatomic structures at the skull base was evaluated using the 3-D and two-dimensional systems. The 3-D technique was superior to the conventional technique for identification of the sella, carotid prominence, optic prominence, cribriform plate, sphenoid, and fovea ethmoidalis. The two systems were equal for detection of the turbinates, clivus, maxillary, ethmoids, and frontal sinuses. Endoscopic skull base surgery with stereoscopic viewing is feasible and safe. Further studies are required to evaluate the advantage of binocular vision in skull base surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic approach; minimal invasive; skull base; stereoscopic view; surgery; three-dimensional

Year:  2010        PMID: 21311614      PMCID: PMC3023316          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  22 in total

1.  The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope.

Authors:  P van Bergen; W Kunert; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  What's new in skull base medicine and surgery? Skull Base Committee Report.

Authors:  Ritvik P Mehta; Roberto A Cueva; J Dale Brown; Dan M Fliss; Ziv Gil; Amin B Kassam; Christopher H Rassekh; Rodney J Schlosser; Carl H Snyderman; Gady Har-El
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Three-dimensional neurostereoendoscopy: subjective and objective comparison to 2D.

Authors:  J F Fraser; B Allen; V K Anand; T H Schwartz
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2009-02-26

4.  The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance.

Authors:  D B Jones; J D Brewer; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1996-06

5.  Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G Crosthwaite; T Chung; P Dunkley; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H Becker; A Melzer; M O Schurr; G Buess
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1993-02

7.  A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap.

Authors:  Gustavo Hadad; Luis Bassagasteguy; Ricardo L Carrau; Juan C Mataza; Amin Kassam; Carl H Snyderman; Arlan Mintz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Outcome of craniofacial surgery in children and adolescents with malignant tumors involving the skull base: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Ziv Gil; Snehal G Patel; Giulio Cantu; Dan M Fliss; Luiz P Kowalski; Bhuvanesh Singh; Carl Snyderman; Dennis H Kraus; Jatin P Shah; Patrick G Bridger; Anthony D Cheesman; Paul Donald; Patrick Gullane; Ivo Janecka; Shin-etsu Kamata; Paul A Levine; Luiz R Medina; Sultan Pradhan; Victor Schramm; William I Wei
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Complications after craniofacial resection for malignant tumors: are complication trends changing?

Authors:  Ziv Gil; Snehal G Patel; Mark Bilsky; Jatin P Shah; Dennis H Kraus
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Analysis of prognostic factors in 146 patients with anterior skull base sarcoma: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Ziv Gil; Snehal G Patel; Bhuvanesh Singh; Giulio Cantu; Dan M Fliss; Luiz P Kowalski; Dennis H Kraus; Carl Snyderman; Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on rhino-neurosurgery.

Authors:  Werner Hosemann; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  4-mm-diameter three-dimensional imaging endoscope with steerable camera for minimally invasive surgery (3-D-MARVEL).

Authors:  Sam Y Bae; Ronald J Korniski; Michael Shearn; Harish M Manohara; Hrayr Shahinian
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.593

3.  Transnasal 3D endoscopic skull base surgery: questionnaire-based analysis of the learning curve in 52 procedures.

Authors:  G Felisati; C Pipolo; A Maccari; A Cardia; M Revay; G B Lasio
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Quality of life following endoscopic resection of skull base tumors.

Authors:  Oren Cavel; Avraham Abergel; Nevo Margalit; Dan M Fliss; Ziv Gil
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-04

5.  Transnasal skull base reconstruction using a 3-d endoscope: our first impressions.

Authors:  Paolo Castelnuovo; Paolo Battaglia; Mario Turri-Zanoni; Luca Volpi; Maurizio Bignami; Iacopo Dallan
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-04

Review 6.  Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers.

Authors:  Shirley Y Su; Michael E Kupferman; Franco DeMonte; Nicholas B Levine; Shaan M Raza; Ehab Y Hanna
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Endoscopic expanded endonasal approach: preliminary experience with the new 3D endoscope.

Authors:  G Felisati; R Lenzi; C Pipolo; A Maccari; F Messina; M Revay; A Lania; A Cardia; G Lasio
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for local recurrent or residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Huapeng Yu; Xicai Sun; Dehui Wang; Yurong Gu; Quan Liu; Huan Wang; Wade Han; Allison Fry
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  The natural evolution of endoscopic approaches in skull base surgery: robotic-assisted surgery?

Authors:  I Dallan; P Castelnuovo; C Vicini; M Tschabitscher
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 10.  Endoscopic endonasal technique: treatment of paranasal and anterior skull base malignancies.

Authors:  Pornthep Kasemsiri; Daniel Monte Serrat Prevedello; Bradley Alan Otto; Matthew Old; Leo Ditzel Filho; Amin Bardai Kassam; Ricardo Luis Carrau
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.