Lixing W Reneker1, Huiyi Chen, Paul A Overbeek. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA. renekerl@health.missouri.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Overloading of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) can cause ER stress and activate the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the cell. The authors tested whether transgene overexpression in the mouse lens would activate the UPR. METHODS: Transgenic mice expressing proteins that either enter the ER secretory pathway or are synthesized in cytosol were selected. Activation of the UPR was assessed by determining the expression levels of the ER chaperone protein BiP, the spliced form of X-box binding protein-1 (Xbp-1) mRNA, and the transcription factor CHOP. Changes in the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the mouse lens were detected by ubiquitin immunofluorescence. RESULTS: BiP expression was upregulated in the fiber cells of transgenic mouse lenses expressing platelet-derived growth factor-A (PDGF-A), dominant-negative fibroblast growth factor receptor (DN-FGFR), or DN-Sprouty2 (DN-Spy2). BiP upregulation occurred around embryonic day 16.5, primarily in the fiber cells adjacent to the organelle free zone. Fiber cell differentiation was disrupted in the PDGF-A and DN-Spry2 lenses, whereas the fiber cells were degenerating in the DN-FGFR lens. High levels of UPR activation and ubiquitin-labeled protein aggregates were found in the DN-FGFR lens, indicating inefficient disposal of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the fiber cells. CONCLUSIONS: This study implies that overexpression of some transgenes in the lens can induce ER or overall cell stress in fiber cells, resulting in the activation of UPR signaling pathways. Therefore, investigators should assess the levels of UPR activation when they analyze the downstream effects of transgene expression in the lens.
PURPOSE: Overloading of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) can cause ER stress and activate the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the cell. The authors tested whether transgene overexpression in the mouse lens would activate the UPR. METHODS:Transgenic mice expressing proteins that either enter the ER secretory pathway or are synthesized in cytosol were selected. Activation of the UPR was assessed by determining the expression levels of the ER chaperone protein BiP, the spliced form of X-box binding protein-1 (Xbp-1) mRNA, and the transcription factor CHOP. Changes in the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the mouse lens were detected by ubiquitin immunofluorescence. RESULTS:BiP expression was upregulated in the fiber cells of transgenic mouse lenses expressing platelet-derived growth factor-A (PDGF-A), dominant-negative fibroblast growth factor receptor (DN-FGFR), or DN-Sprouty2 (DN-Spy2). BiP upregulation occurred around embryonic day 16.5, primarily in the fiber cells adjacent to the organelle free zone. Fiber cell differentiation was disrupted in the PDGF-A and DN-Spry2 lenses, whereas the fiber cells were degenerating in the DN-FGFR lens. High levels of UPR activation and ubiquitin-labeled protein aggregates were found in the DN-FGFR lens, indicating inefficient disposal of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the fiber cells. CONCLUSIONS: This study implies that overexpression of some transgenes in the lens can induce ER or overall cell stress in fiber cells, resulting in the activation of UPR signaling pathways. Therefore, investigators should assess the levels of UPR activation when they analyze the downstream effects of transgene expression in the lens.
Authors: Haotian Zhao; Tianyu Yang; Bhavani P Madakashira; Cornelius A Thiels; Chad A Bechtle; Claudia M Garcia; Huiming Zhang; Kai Yu; David M Ornitz; David C Beebe; Michael L Robinson Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Zeynep Firtina; Brian P Danysh; Xiaoyang Bai; Douglas B Gould; Takehiro Kobayashi; Melinda K Duncan Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Mary Anna Carbone; Julien F Ayroles; Akihiko Yamamoto; Tatiana V Morozova; Steven A West; Michael M Magwire; Trudy F C Mackay; Robert R H Anholt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sindhu S Kumari; Jason Gandhi; Mohammed H Mustehsan; Semih Eren; Kulandaiappan Varadaraj Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Yuliya V Rumyantseva; Elena I Ryabchikova; Anjela Z Fursova; Nataliya G Kolosova Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Lei Lyu; Elizabeth A Whitcomb; Shuhong Jiang; Min-Lee Chang; Yumei Gu; Melinda K Duncan; Ales Cvekl; Wei-Lin Wang; Saima Limi; Lixing W Reneker; Fu Shang; Linfang Du; Allen Taylor Journal: FASEB J Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: G Senthil Kumar; John W Kyle; Peter J Minogue; K Dinesh Kumar; K Vasantha; Viviana M Berthoud; Eric C Beyer; S T Santhiya Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2012-10-29 Impact factor: 3.467