Literature DB >> 21310387

Impact of clinical factors on the long-term functional and anatomic outcomes of osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis.

María Fideliz De La Paz1, Juan Álvarez De Toledo, Victor Charoenrook, Saadettin Sel, José Temprano, Rafael I Barraquer, Ralph Michael.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the long-term functional and anatomic outcomes of osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis; to analyze the influence of clinical factors, such as surgical technique, primary diagnosis, age, and postoperative complications, on the final outcome.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: setting: Centro de Oftalmología Barraquer, between 1974 and 2005. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients. intervention: Biological keratoprosthesis using osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis or tibial bone keratoprosthesis. main outcome measures: Functional survival with success defined as best-corrected visual acuity ≥0.05; anatomic survival with success defined as retention of the keratoprosthesis lamina.
RESULTS: Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis have comparable anatomic survival at 5 and 10 years of follow-up, but osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis has a significantly better functional success than tibial bone keratoprosthesis at the same time periods. Among the primary diagnoses, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, chemical burn, and trachoma have generally good functional and anatomic outcomes and the least favorable prognosis is for ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Younger patients fared better than those in older age groups. The most frequent complications were extrusion (28%), retinal detachment (16%), and uncontrolled glaucoma (11%). The glaucoma group had the best anatomic success but the worst functional results, only exceeded by the retinal detachment group in terms of functional outcome.
CONCLUSION: Clinical factors, such as surgical technique, primary diagnosis, age, and postoperative complications, can affect the long-term anatomic and functional successes of biological keratoprosthesis. Knowledge about the impact of each of these factors on survival can help surgeons determine the best approach in every particular case.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21310387     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  11 in total

1.  Structural & functional rehabilitation in eyes with lamina resorption following MOOKP--can the lamina be salvaged?

Authors:  Geetha Iyer; Bhaskar Srinivasan; Shweta Agarwal; Shanmugasundaram Shanmugasundaram; Gunaseelan Rajan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Anatomical survival and visual prognosis of Boston type I keratoprosthesis in challenging cases.

Authors:  Maria Fideliz de la Paz; Josef Stoiber; Valeria de Rezende Couto Nascimento; Juan Alvarez de Toledo; Orang Seyeddain; Wolfgang Hitzl; Günther Grabner; Rafael I Barraquer; Ralph Michael
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Bone augmentation of the osteo-odonto alveolar lamina in MOOKP--will it delay laminar resorption?

Authors:  Geetha Iyer; Bhaskar Srinivasan; Shweta Agarwal; Ekta Rishi; Pukhraj Rishi; Gunaseelan Rajan; Shanmugasundaram Shanmugasundaram
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comprehensive approach to ocular consequences of Stevens Johnson Syndrome - the aftermath of a systemic condition.

Authors:  Geetha Iyer; Bhaskar Srinivasan; Shweta Agarwal; Seema Kamala Muralidharan; Sumathi Arumugam
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Current and Upcoming Therapies for Ocular Surface Chemical Injuries.

Authors:  Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Medi Eslani; Zeeshan Haq; Ebrahim Shirzadeh; Michael J Huvard; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 6.  [Mucous membrane pemphigoid].

Authors:  M M Holtsche; D Zillikens; E Schmidt
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 7.  Keratoprostheses for corneal blindness: a review of contemporary devices.

Authors:  Venkata S Avadhanam; Helen E Smith; Christopher Liu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-16

8.  Piezoelectric harvest of osteo-odonto-lamina in modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis: A maxillofacial perspective.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Sandeep Kumar Pandey; Ajoy Roychoudhury; Ongkila Bhutia; Radhika Tandon; Sahil Parvez Gagnani; Rahul Yadav
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

9.  The Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis to restore vision after severe dog bite injury.

Authors:  Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati; Alfonso Vasquez-Perez; Ahmed Shalaby Bardan; Christopher Liu
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-29

Review 10.  Osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis: Innovative dental and ophthalmic blending.

Authors:  Jaswinder Kaur
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.