Literature DB >> 21308837

Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.

E A Torkildsen1, K Å Salvesen, T M Eggebø.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if fetal head-perineum distance and angle of progression measured with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound could predict outcome of labor in primiparous women with prolonged first stage of labor.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 110 primiparous women with singleton cephalic presentation at term diagnosed with prolonged first stage of labor. Digital assessment of fetal station was related to the ischial spine. Fetal head descent was measured with transperineal ultrasound as the shortest distance from the fetal head to the perineum, and the angle between the pubic symphysis and the fetal head. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed and 2D and 3D data acquisitions were compared. The stored 3D volumes were assessed by an examiner blinded to all other data. Vaginal delivery vs. Cesarean section was the primary outcome.
RESULTS: Cesarean section was performed in 25% of the women. Areas under the ROC curves for prediction of vaginal delivery were 81% (95% confidence interval (CI), 71-91%) (P < 0.01) and 76% (95% CI, 66-87%) (P < 0.01) for fetal head-perineum distance and angle of progression, respectively, as measured by 2D ultrasound and 66% (95% CI, 54-79%) for digital assessment of fetal station (P = 0.01). In 50% of women fetal head-perineum distance was ≤ 40 mm and 93% (95% CI, 83-97%) of them delivered vaginally vs. 18% (95% CI, 5-48%) with distance > 50 mm. In 48% of women the angle of progression was ≥ 110° and 87% (95% CI, 75-93%) of them delivered vaginally vs. 38% (95% CI, 21-57%) with angle < 100°. Results from 2D and 3D acquisitions were similar.
CONCLUSION: Fetal head-perineum distance and angle of progression measured with 2D or 3D ultrasound can predict labor outcome, with similar predictive values for the two techniques.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21308837     DOI: 10.1002/uog.8951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.

Authors:  Manasi Patwardhan; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse Schwartz; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery by transperineal ultrasound performed just after full cervical dilatation is determined.

Authors:  Saeko Kameyama; Akira Sato; Hiroshi Miura; Jin Kumagai; Naoki Sato; Dai Shimizu; Kenichi Makino; Yukihiro Terada
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor.

Authors:  Edi Vaisbuch; Roni Levy; Tamar Katzir; Yoav Brezinov; Ella Khairish; Shira Hadad
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Ultrasound Assessment of Foetal Head-Perineum Distance Prior to Induction of Labour as a Predictor of Successful Vaginal Delivery.

Authors:  Jijisha Ali; Shripad Hebbar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-04-09

5.  Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of fetal spine position.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Alessandra Andrisani; Marco Noventa; Giorgia Burul; Stefania Di Gangi; Omar Anis; Emanuele Ancona; Donato D'Antona; Giovanni Battista Nardelli; Guido Ambrosini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound.

Authors:  Sana Usman; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  Intrapartum ultrasound: viewpoint of midwives and parturient women and reproducibility.

Authors:  Adrielle Van Adrichem; Ellen Faes; Kristof Kinget; Yves Jacquemyn
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-06

8.  Accuracy of non-invasive methods for assessing the progress of labor in the first stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wan-Lin Pan; Li-Li Chen; Meei-Ling Gau
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 9.  Intrapartum sonography - eccentricity or necessity?

Authors:  Marzena Dębska; Piotr Kretowicz; Romuald Dębski
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2015-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.