Literature DB >> 21308392

The application of muscle wrapping to voxel-based finite element models of skeletal structures.

Jia Liu1, Junfen Shi, Laura C Fitton, Roger Phillips, Paul O'Higgins, Michael J Fagan.   

Abstract

Finite elements analysis (FEA) is now used routinely to interpret skeletal form in terms of function in both medical and biological applications. To produce accurate predictions from FEA models, it is essential that the loading due to muscle action is applied in a physiologically reasonable manner. However, it is common for muscle forces to be represented as simple force vectors applied at a few nodes on the model's surface. It is certainly rare for any wrapping of the muscles to be considered, and yet wrapping not only alters the directions of muscle forces but also applies an additional compressive load from the muscle belly directly to the underlying bone surface. This paper presents a method of applying muscle wrapping to high-resolution voxel-based finite element (FE) models. Such voxel-based models have a number of advantages over standard (geometry-based) FE models, but the increased resolution with which the load can be distributed over a model's surface is particularly advantageous, reflecting more closely how muscle fibre attachments are distributed. In this paper, the development, application and validation of a muscle wrapping method is illustrated using a simple cylinder. The algorithm: (1) calculates the shortest path over the surface of a bone given the points of origin and ultimate attachment of the muscle fibres; (2) fits a Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) curve from the shortest path and calculates its tangent, normal vectors and curvatures so that normal and tangential components of the muscle force can be calculated and applied along the fibre; and (3) automatically distributes the loads between adjacent fibres to cover the bone surface with a fully distributed muscle force, as is observed in vivo. Finally, we present a practical application of this approach to the wrapping of the temporalis muscle around the cranium of a macaque skull.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21308392     DOI: 10.1007/s10237-011-0291-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  14 in total

1.  Masticatory loadings and cranial deformation in Macaca fascicularis: a finite element analysis sensitivity study.

Authors:  L C Fitton; J F Shi; M J Fagan; P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Predicting bite force and cranial biomechanics in the largest fossil rodent using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Philip G Cox; Andrés Rinderknecht; R Ernesto Blanco
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Computational biomechanics changes our view on insect head evolution.

Authors:  Alexander Blanke; Peter J Watson; Richard Holbrey; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  An eFTD-VP framework for efficiently generating patient-specific anatomically detailed facial soft tissue FE mesh for craniomaxillofacial surgery simulation.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Daeseung Kim; Shunyao Shen; Peng Yuan; Siting Liu; Zhen Tang; Guangming Zhang; Xiaobo Zhou; Jaime Gateno; Michael A K Liebschner; James J Xia
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-10-12

6.  Validity and sensitivity of a human cranial finite element model: implications for comparative studies of biting performance.

Authors:  Viviana Toro-Ibacache; Laura C Fitton; Michael J Fagan; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Masticatory biomechanics of the Laotian rock rat, Laonastes aenigmamus, and the function of the zygomaticomandibularis muscle.

Authors:  Philip G Cox; Joanna Kirkham; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Beware the black box: investigating the sensitivity of FEA simulations to modelling factors in comparative biomechanics.

Authors:  Christopher W Walmsley; Matthew R McCurry; Phillip D Clausen; Colin R McHenry
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Distinct growth of the nasomaxillary complex in Au. sediba.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Lacruz; Timothy G Bromage; Paul O'Higgins; Viviana Toro-Ibacache; Johanna Warshaw; Lee R Berger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The adaptive significance of enamel loss in the mandibular incisors of cercopithecine primates (Mammalia: Cercopithecidae): a finite element modelling study.

Authors:  Kornelius Kupczik; Netta Lev-Tov Chattah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.