Literature DB >> 21306835

Quantification of partial or complete A4 pulley release with FDP repair in cadaveric tendons.

Orrin I Franko1, Nathan M Lee, John J Finneran, Matthew C Shillito, Matthew J Meunier, Reid A Abrams, Richard L Lieber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Repair of a lacerated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon underneath or just distal to the A4 pulley can be technically challenging, and success can be confounded by tendon triggering and scarring to the pulley. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of partial and complete A4 pulley release in the context of a lacerated and repaired FDP tendon just distal to the A4 pulley.
METHODS: Tendon biomechanics were tested in 6 cadaveric hands secured to a rigid frame, permitting measurement of tendon excursion, tendon force, and finger range of motion. After control testing, each finger had laceration and repair of the FDP tendon at the distal margin of the A4 pulley using a 6-strand core suture technique and epitendinous repair. Testing was then repeated after the following interventions: (1) intact A4 pulley, (2) release of the distal half of the A4 pulley, (3) complete release of the A4 pulley, and (4) continued proximal release of the sheath to the distal edge of A2 (release of C2, A3, and C1 pulleys). Release of the pulleys was performed by incision; no tissue was removed from the specimens.
RESULTS: From full extension to full flexion, average FDP tendon excursion for all intact digits was 37.9 ± 1.5 mm, and tendon repair resulted in average tendon shortening of 1.6 ± 0.4 mm. Flexion lag increased from <1 mm to >4 mm with venting of the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release, respectively. Compared to the intact state, repair of the tendon with an intact A4 pulley, release of half the A4 pulley, complete A4 release, and proximal sheath release resulted in percentage increases in work of flexion of 11.5 ± 3.1%, 0.83 ± 2.8%, 2.6 ± 2.4%, and 3.25 ± 2.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: After FDP laceration and repair in the region of the A4 pulley, work of flexion did not increase by more than 3% from control conditions after partial or complete A4 pulley release, and work of flexion was significantly less than that achieved by performing a repair and leaving the A4 pulley intact.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306835      PMCID: PMC3056482          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  25 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of the six-strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study.

Authors:  R S Gill; B H Lim; R A Shatford; E Toth; M J Voor; T M Tsai
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Effect of A3 pulley and adjacent sheath integrity on tendon excursion and bowstringing.

Authors:  J B Tang; R G Xie
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Tendon and pulleys at the metacarpophalangeal joint of a finger.

Authors:  P W Brand; K C Cranor; J C Ellis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A2 pulley incision or one slip of the superficialis improves flexor tendon repairs.

Authors:  Jin Bo Tang; Ren Guo Xie; Yi Cao; Zun San Ke; Yan Xu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Flexor tendon injuries. Part 2. Flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  J W Strickland
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1986-11

6.  Experimental evaluation of factors affecting the strength of tendon repairs.

Authors:  L D Ketchum; N L Martin; D A Kappel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Effect of pulley excision on flexor tendon biomechanics.

Authors:  W W Peterson; P R Manske; B A Bollinger; P A Lesker; J A McCarthy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Anatomy of the flexor tendon sheath and pulleys of the thumb.

Authors:  J R Doyle; W F Blythe
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Incision and closure of the flexor sheath during primary tendon repair.

Authors:  G D Lister
Journal:  Hand       Date:  1983-06

10.  Palmar aponeurosis pulley.

Authors:  P R Manske; P A Lesker
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.230

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Closed flexor pulley injuries: A literature review and current practice.

Authors:  Francesco Bosco; Fortunato Giustra; Alessandro Lusso; Carlotta Faccenda; Stefano Artiaco; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-09

Review 2.  Is releasing pulleys during flexor tendon repair "part and parcel"? Narrative review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Amir Abdelmalek; John McFarlane
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 3.  Avoidance of unfavourable results following primary flexor tendon surgery.

Authors:  D Elliot; T Giesen
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05

4.  Practice Patterns in Operative Flexor Tendon Laceration Repair: A 15-Year Analysis of Continuous Certification Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Joshua P Weissman; Daniel C Sasson; Ava G Chappell; Steven L Moran; Arun K Gosain
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-10-07

5.  Morphological features of the chiasma tendinum and its relation with surface landmarks and pulleys: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Uğur Dinç; Ecem Şengezer; Orhan Beger; Merve Şehide Yılmaz; Zeliha Kurtoğlu Olgunus
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.