| Literature DB >> 21306648 |
Morten Busk1, Kasper Toustrup, Brita S Sørensen, Jan Alsner, Michael R Horsman, Steen Jakobsen, Jens Overgaard.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor hypoxia is linked to poor prognosis, but identification and quantification of tissue hypoxia remains a challenge. The hypoxia-specificity of HIF-1α target genes in vivo has been questioned due to the confounding influence of other microenvironmental abnormalities known to affect gene expression (e.g., low pH). Here we describe a new technique that by exploiting intratumoral oxygenation heterogeneity allows us to identify and objectively rank the most robust mRNA hypoxia biomarkers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21306648 PMCID: PMC3042974 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-63
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Figure 1Relative expression of mRNA levels as a function of FAZA retention. Scatterplots showing the relationship between regional FAZA retention (relative to muscle) and expression levels of the three HIF-1α regulated genes CA9, GLUT1 and LOX in 2 representative fragmented FaDudd xenograft tumors. Each dot represents matching values for a single tumor fragment.
Figure 2Relative expression of mRNA levels as a function of FAZA retention. Scatterplots showing the relationship between regional FAZA retention (relative to muscle) and expression levels of the three HIF-1α regulated genes CA9, GLUT1 and LOX in 2 representative fragmented murine SCCVII tumors. Each dot represents matching values for a single tumor fragment.
Summary of Pearson regression coefficients (R) and P values when comparing relative gene expression and relative FAZA retention in small tumor fragments obtained from 4 human FaDudd tumors and 4 murine SCCVII tumors.
| FaDudd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.77 | ≈10-4 | 0.85 | 3×10-6 | 0.72 | < 10-3 | 0.17 | 0.48 | 0.77 | < 10-3 | -0.65 | 0.003 |
| B | 0.84 | 5×10-6 | 0.89 | < 10-6 | 0.63 | 0.003 | 0.67 | 0.001 | 0.86 | 10-6 | -0.73 | < 10-3 |
| C | 0.48 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 0.02 | 0.62 | 0.004 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.73 | < 10-3 | -0.33 | 0.17 |
| D | 0.68 | 10-3 | 0.75 | ≈10-3 | 0.73 | < 10-3 | -0.1 | 0.69 | 0.75 | < 10-3 | -0.54 | 0.02 |
| Mean | ||||||||||||
| Pooled | 0.58 | < 10-7 | 0.74 | < 10-14 | 0.52 | < 10-6 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.76 | < 10-15 | -0.45 | < 10-4 |
| A | 0.92 | < 10-4 | 0.94 | < 10-4 | 0.82 | 0.002 | 0.89 | < 10-3 | -0.54 | 0.08 | 0.70 | 0.02 |
| B | 0.89 | < 10-6 | 0.76 | < 10-3 | 0.50 | 0.03 | 0.80 | < 10-4 | -0.48 | 0.03 | 0.49 | 0.04 |
| C | 0.60 | 0.005 | 0.60 | 0.005 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.53 | 0.02 | -0.35 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.7 |
| D | 0.70 | < 10-3 | 0.47 | 0.03 | -0.10 | 0.67 | 0.16 | 0.51 | -0.30 | 0.20 | 0.36 | 0.1 |
| Mean | ||||||||||||
| Pooled | 0.65 | < 10-9 | 0.64 | < 10-8 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.56 | < 10-6 | -0.38 | 0.001 | 0.39 | < 10-3 |
Analysis was performed on a per-tumor basis (A, B, C and D). Similar data analysis was also performed after data were pooled, i.e., for each gene the relative gene expression for all fragments for a given tumor type was plotted as function of relative FAZA content followed by regression analysis.
Figure 3Relative expression of mRNA levels as a function of FAZA retention. Scatterplots showing the relationship between regional FAZA retention (relative to muscle) and expression levels of the two HIF-1α regulated genes LDH and GAPDH and the non-HIF-1α regulated gene ATF4 in 2 representative fragmented FaDudd xenograft tumors. Each dot represents matching values for a single tumor fragment.
Figure 4Relative expression of mRNA levels as a function of FAZA retention. Scatterplots showing the relationship between regional FAZA retention (relative to muscle) and expression levels of the two HIF-1α regulated genes LDH and GAPDH and the non-HIF-1α regulated gene ATF4 in 2 representative fragmented murine SCCVII tumors. Each dot represents matching values for a single tumor fragment.