Literature DB >> 21306239

The role of public-sector research in the discovery of drugs and vaccines.

Ashley J Stevens1, Jonathan J Jensen, Katrine Wyller, Patrick C Kilgore, Sabarni Chatterjee, Mark L Rohrbaugh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Historically, public-sector researchers have performed the upstream, basic research that elucidated the underlying mechanisms of disease and identified promising points of intervention, whereas corporate researchers have performed the downstream, applied research resulting in the discovery of drugs for the treatment of diseases and have carried out development activities to bring them to market. However, the boundaries between the roles of the public and private sectors have shifted substantially since the dawn of the biotechnology era, and the public sector now has a much more direct role in the applied-research phase of drug discovery.
METHODS: We identified new drugs and vaccines approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that were discovered by public-sector research institutions (PSRIs) and classified them according to their therapeutic category and potential therapeutic effect.
RESULTS: We found that during the past 40 years, 153 new FDA-approved drugs, vaccines, or new indications for existing drugs were discovered through research carried out in PSRIs. These drugs included 93 small-molecule drugs, 36 biologic agents, 15 vaccines, 8 in vivo diagnostic materials, and 1 over-the-counter drug. More than half of these drugs have been used in the treatment or prevention of cancer or infectious diseases. PSRI-discovered drugs are expected to have a disproportionately large therapeutic effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Public-sector research has had a more immediate effect on improving public health than was previously realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306239     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1008268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  41 in total

1.  The NIH translational research center might trade public risk for private reward.

Authors:  Jerry Avorn; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Starting up and spinning out: The changing nature of partnerships between pharma and academia.

Authors:  Wudan Yan
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  History of Chemistry in the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).

Authors:  Kenneth L Kirk; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Bull Hist Chem       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Do March-In Rights Ensure Access to Medical Products Arising From Federally Funded Research? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Carolyn L Treasure; Jerry Avorn; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Academic-Industrial Collaboration: Toward the Consilience of Two Solitudes.

Authors:  Stephen Hanessian
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Medicinal chemistry for 2020.

Authors:  Seetharama D Satyanarayanajois; Ronald A Hill
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.808

7.  Scientific Drought, Golden Eggs, and Global Leadership - Why Trump's NIH Funding Cuts Would Be a Disaster.

Authors:  Ingrid T Katz; Alexi A Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  US academic drug discovery.

Authors:  Stephen Frye; Marina Crosby; Teresa Edwards; Rudolph Juliano
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  Enhancing ties between academia and industry to improve health.

Authors:  S Claiborne Johnston; Stephen L Hauser; Susan Desmond-Hellmann
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 10.  Leveraging public private partnerships to innovate under challenging budget times.

Authors:  Lili M Portilla; Mark L Rohrbaugh
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.