Literature DB >> 21304750

Complete genome sequence of Methanoplanus petrolearius type strain (SEBR 4847).

Evelyne Brambilla, Olivier Duplex Ngatchou Djao, Hajnalka Daligault, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Nancy Hammon, Matt Nolan, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Manfred Rohde, Stefan Spring, Johannes Sikorski, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Methanoplanus petrolearius Ollivier et al. 1998 is the type strain of the genus Methanoplanus. The strain was originally isolated from an offshore oil field from the Gulf of Guinea. Members of the genus Methanoplanus are of interest because they play an important role in the carbon cycle and also because of their significant contribution to the global warming by methane emission in the atmosphere. Like other archaea of the family Methanomicrobiales, the members of the genus Methanoplanus are able to use CO(2) and H(2) as a source of carbon and energy; acetate is required for growth and probably also serves as carbon source. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the family Methanomicrobiaceae and the sixth complete genome sequence from the order Methanomicrobiales. The 2,843,290 bp long genome with its 2,824 protein-coding and 57 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Euryarchaeota; GEBA; Gram-negative; Methanomicrobiaceae; hydrogen; mesophilic; methane; obligately anaerobic

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304750      PMCID: PMC3035365          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1183143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain SEBR 4847T (= DSM 11571 = OCM 486) is the type strain of Methanoplanus petrolearius [1]. This strain was isolated from an offshore oil-producing well in the Gulf of Guinea, Africa [1]. Currently, the genus Methanoplanus contains three species: M. petrolearius, the type species M. limicola (isolated from an Italian swamp containing drilling waste near Baia in the Naples Area), and M. endosymbiosus (isolated from the marine ciliate Metopus contortus) [1]. The genus name derived from the Latin word “methanum”, and the adjective “planus”, meaning a flat plate, which refers to its flat cell morphology [1,2]. Methanoplanus therefore means “methane (-producing) plate”. The species epithet petrolearius derives from the Latin word “petra”, rock and the adjective “olearius”, which relates to vegetable oil [1]. “Petrolearius” means therefore related to mineral oil, referring to its origin of isolation [1]. No additional cultivated strains belonging to the species M. petrolearius have been described thus far. M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T is like other methanogens, strictly anaerobic. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for M. petrolearius strain SEBR 4847T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The type strains of the two other species in the genus Methanoplanus share an average of 93.5% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with strain SEBR 4847T [1,2]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the strain SEBR 4847T shows 99% identity with an uncultured environmental 16S rRNA gene sequence of the clone KO-Eth-A (AB236050) obtained from the marine sediment [3]. The 16S rRNA gene sequences similarities of the strain SEBR 4847T to metagenomic libraries (env_nt) were all 83% or less, (status August 2010), indicating that members of the species, genus and even family are poorly represented in the habitats screened thus far. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 11571 (U76631), which contained four ambiguous base calls.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T relative to the other type strains within the order Methanomicrobiales. The tree was inferred from 1,275 aligned characters [4,5] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [6] and rooted with Methanocellales [7]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 350 bootstrap replicates [8] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [9] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [10,11] and GenBank accessions CP001338 (for Methanosphaera palustris E1-9c) and AP011532 (for Methanocella paludicola).

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T relative to the other type strains within the order Methanomicrobiales. The tree was inferred from 1,275 aligned characters [4,5] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [6] and rooted with Methanocellales [7]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 350 bootstrap replicates [8] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [9] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [10,11] and GenBank accessions CP001338 (for Methanosphaera palustris E1-9c) and AP011532 (for Methanocella paludicola). The cells of strain SEBR 4847T stain Gram-negative, but archaea do not have a Gram-negative type of cell wall with an outer envelope. Cells occur singly or in pairs and are irregularly disc-shaped of 1 to 3 µm size (Figure 2 and Table 1). A similar shape was found for two other strains of the genus Methanoplanus [1,2,24]. Strain SEBR 4847T was originally described as non-motile [1], however, in samples of this strain kept in the DSMZ culture collection motile cells were frequently detected in young cultures (H. Hippe, personal communication). The genome sequence of SEBR 4847T contains numerous genes encoding flagellins (Mpet_2052 - Mpet2054, Mpet_2057) and chemotaxis proteins (Mpet_2064 – Mpet_2069), which is in line with the observation of motility in this species. Round colonies of 1-2 mm are observed after three weeks of incubation on solid agar medium. The generation time of strain SEBR 4847T is about 10 hours under optimal conditions [1]. Strain SEBR 4847T grows optimally at 37°C, the temperature range for growth being 28-43°C. No growth was observed at 25°C or 45°C [1]. The optimum pH is 7.0; growth occurs from pH 5.3 to 8.4. The optimum NaCl concentration for growth is between 1 and 3% NaCl with growth occurring at NaCl concentrations ranging from 0 to 5% [1]. Substrates for growth of strain SEBR 4847T are H2 + CO2, formate and CO2 + 2-propanol [1]. Strain SEBR 4847T does not utilize methanol, trimethylamine, lactate, glucose, CO2 + 1-propanol, CO2 + 1-butanol and isobutyrate [1]. Acetate is required for growth as carbon source and yeast extract is stimulatory [1]. Addition of acetate reduces the lag time [25]. The addition of acetate slightly increases the amount of H2 available, theoretically [26,27]. When H2 is limiting and sulfate is in excess, sulfate reducers compete with methanogens and homoacetogens for the available H2 [27]. The sulfate reducers can out-compete hydrogenotrophic methanogens, due to a higher affinity [28] and higher activity of hydrogenase and the energetically more favorable reduction of sulfate [29]. Similar features were observed for M. limicola and M. endosymbiosus [1,2,24].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T

Table 1

Classification and general features of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T according to the MIGS recommendations [12]

MIGS ID     Property   Term   Evidence code
     Current classification   Domain Archaea   TAS [13]
   Phylum Euryarchaeota   TAS [14,15]
   Class Methanomicrobia   TAS [16]
   Order Methanomicrobiales   TAS [17-19]
   Family Methanomicrobiaceae   TAS [17,18]
   Genus Methanoplanus   TAS [2,20]
   Species Methanoplanus petrolearius   TAS [1,21]
   Type strain SEBR 4847   TAS [1]
     Gram stain   negative   TAS [2]
     Cell shape   disc-shaped, irregular single or in pairs   TAS [1]
     Motility   motile   IDA
     Sporulation   not reported   NAS
     Temperature range   28-43°C   TAS [1]
     Optimum temperature   37°C   TAS [1]
     Salinity   1-3% NaCl   TAS [1]
MIGS-22     Oxygen requirement   anaerobic obligate   TAS [1]
     Carbon source   acetate, CO2, formate   TAS [1]
     Energy source   H2 + CO2, formate and CO2 + 2-propanol   TAS [1]
MIGS-6     Habitat   offshore oil field   TAS [1]
MIGS-15     Biotic relationship   not reported   NAS
MIGS-14     Pathogenicity   not reported   NAS
     Biosafety level   1   TAS [22]
     Isolation   subsurface ecosystem   TAS [1]
MIGS-4     Geographic location   offshore oil field, Gulf of Guinea, West Africa   TAS [1]
MIGS-5     Sample collection time   1997 or before   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2     Latitude     Longitude   not reported   NAS
MIGS-4.3     Depth   not reported   NAS
MIGS-4.4     Altitude   not reported   NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Scanning electron micrograph of M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Chemotaxonomy

At the time of writing, no reports have been published describing the composition of the cell envelope of the strain SEBR 4847T. However, for the two other species in the genus Methanoplanus, M. limicola and M. endosymbiosus, several chemotaxonomic features have been reported [2,24]. Preparations of the cell envelope from M. limicola and M. endosymbiosius revealed the presence of a dominant band that appeared to be a glycoprotein when cells were disrupted in 2% SDS [2,24]. Methanoplanus spp. possesses a mixture of C20C20 and C40C40 core ethers [30]. For comparison, similar mixtures were also detected in other members of the family Methanomicrobiaceae: Methanogenium cariaci, Methanogenium marisnigri and Methanogenium thermophilicum, while C20C25 was absent in these species [30].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [31], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [32]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [9] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property    Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used    Tree genomic libraries:    454 pyrosequence standard library,     paired end 454 library (9.5 kb insert size),    Illumina GAii shotgun library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms    454 GS FLX Titanium, Illumina GAii
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage    67.9 × pyrosequence, 52.2 × Illumina
MIGS-30     Assemblers    Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-09-14-2009, Velvet, phrap
MIGS-32     Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
     INSDC ID    CP002117
     Genbank Date of Release    September 17, 2010
     NCBI project ID    40773
     GOLD ID    Gc01372
     Database: IMG-GEBA    2503128011
MIGS-13     Source material identifier    DSM 11571
     Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

M. petrolearius SEBR 4847T, DSM 11571, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 141 (Methanogenium medium) [33] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 0.2 g of cell paste using a phenol/chloroform extraction after cell lysis with a mixture of lysozyme and mutanolysin.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler Version 2.3 Pre-Release-09-14-2009 (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisted of 21 contigs in one scaffold that was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus sequence. Illumina GAii sequencing data (148.5Mb) was assembled with Velvet [34] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The draft assembly was based on 173.4 Mb of 454 data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (www.phrap.com) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment of the genome sequence. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI) [35]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 139 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [36]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 120.1× coverage of the genome. The final assembly of the genoe contains 590,575 pyrosequences and 4,125,153 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [37] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [38]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [39].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,843,290 bp long chromosome with a 47.4% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,881 genes predicted, 2,825 were protein-coding genes, and 57 RNAs; thirty nine pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (61.2%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)2,843,290100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)2,501,89387.99%
DNA G+C content (bp)1,347,69647.40%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes2,881100.00%
RNA genes571.98%
rRNA operons2
Protein-coding genes2,82498.02%
Pseudo genes391.35%
Genes with function prediction1,79362.24%
Genes in paralog clusters55019.10%
Genes assigned to COGs1,93967.30%
Genes assigned Pfam domains2,00069.42%
Genes with signal peptides49217.10%
Genes with transmembrane helices88630.75%
CRISPR repeats0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value    %age    Description
J   150    7.1    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   0    0.0    RNA processing and modification
K   106    5.0    Transcription
L   80    3.8    Replication, recombination and repair
B   2    0.1    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   18    0.9    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0    0.0    Nuclear structure
V   28    1.3    Defense mechanisms
T   136    6.5    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   67    3.2    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   54    2.6    Cell motility
Z   1    0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0    0.0    Extracellular structures
U   32    1.5    Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O   80    3.8    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   185    8.8    Energy production and conversion
G   70    3.3    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   155    7.4    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   61    2.9    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   162    7.7    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   22    1.1    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   143    6.8    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   7    0.3    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   278    13.2    General function prediction only
S   267    12.7    Function unknown
-   942    32.7    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  28 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  The nomenclatural types of the orders Acholeplasmatales, Halanaerobiales, Halobacteriales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Planctomycetales, Prochlorales, Sulfolobales, Thermococcales, Thermoproteales and Verrucomicrobiales are the genera Acholeplasma, Halanaerobium, Halobacterium, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanomicrobium, Planctomyces, Prochloron, Sulfolobus, Thermococcus, Thermoproteus and Verrucomicrobium, respectively. Opinion 79.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List No. 40.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1992-01

Review 7.  Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group.

Authors:  W E Balch; G E Fox; L J Magrum; C R Woese; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1979-06

8.  Acetate versus hydrogen as direct electron donors to stimulate the microbial reductive dechlorination process at chloroethene-contaminated sites.

Authors:  Jianzhong He; Youlboong Sung; Mike E Dollhopf; Babu Z Fathepure; James M Tiedje; Frank E Löffler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Complete genome sequence of Methanoculleus marisnigri Romesser et al. 1981 type strain JR1.

Authors:  Iain J Anderson; Magdalena Sieprawska-Lupa; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Eileen Dalin; Kerrie Barry; Elizabeth Saunders; Cliff Han; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; David Bruce; Natalia Mikhailova; Sam Pitluck; Loren Hauser; Miriam Land; Susan Lucas; Paul Richardson; William B Whitman; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-09-25
View more
  5 in total

1.  Genomic composition and dynamics among Methanomicrobiales predict adaptation to contrasting environments.

Authors:  Patrick Browne; Hideyuki Tamaki; Nikos Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Lynne Goodwin; Hiroyuki Imachi; Suzanna Bräuer; Joseph B Yavitt; Wen-Tso Liu; Stephen Zinder; Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Evaluation of temperature, pH and nutrient conditions in bacterial growth and extracellular hydrolytic activities of two Alicyclobacillus spp. strains.

Authors:  Lourdes Yaret Ortiz-Cortés; Lucía María Cristina Ventura-Canseco; Miguel Abud-Archila; Víctor Manuel Ruíz-Valdiviezo; Irving Oswaldo Velázquez-Ríos; Peggy Elizabeth Alvarez-Gutiérrez
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Roland Wirth; Etelka Kovács; Gergely Maróti; Zoltán Bagi; Gábor Rákhely; Kornél L Kovács
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Genome sequence of the mud-dwelling archaeon Methanoplanus limicola type strain (DSM 2279(T)), reclassification of Methanoplanus petrolearius as Methanolacinia petrolearia and emended descriptions of the genera Methanoplanus and Methanolacinia.

Authors:  Markus Göker; Megan Lu; Anne Fiebig; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Hope Tice; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Shanmugam Mayilraj; Manfred Rohde; John C Detter; Boyke Bunk; Stefan Spring; Reinhard Wirth; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2014-03-15

5.  Draft Genome Sequences of Methanoculleus horonobensis Strain JCM 15517, Methanoculleus thermophilus Strain DSM 2373, and Methanofollis ethanolicus Strain JCM 15103, Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens Belonging to the Family Methanomicrobiaceae.

Authors:  Takashi Narihiro; Hiroyuki Kusada; Yasuko Yoneda; Hideyuki Tamaki
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-03-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.