Literature DB >> 21304656

Complete genome sequence of Methanoculleus marisnigri Romesser et al. 1981 type strain JR1.

Iain J Anderson, Magdalena Sieprawska-Lupa, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Eileen Dalin, Kerrie Barry, Elizabeth Saunders, Cliff Han, Thomas Brettin, John C Detter, David Bruce, Natalia Mikhailova, Sam Pitluck, Loren Hauser, Miriam Land, Susan Lucas, Paul Richardson, William B Whitman, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Methanoculleus marisnigri Romesser et al. 1981 is a methanogen belonging to the order Methanomicrobiales within the archaeal phylum Euryarchaeota. The type strain, JR1, was isolated from anoxic sediments of the Black Sea. M. marisnigri is of phylogenetic interest because at the time the sequencing project began only one genome had previously been sequenced from the order Methanomicrobiales. We report here the complete genome sequence of M. marisnigri type strain JR1 and its annotation. This is part of a Joint Genome Institute 2006 Community Sequencing Program to sequence genomes of diverse Archaea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methanomicrobiales; archaea; methanogen

Year:  2009        PMID: 21304656      PMCID: PMC3035220          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.32535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Methanoculleus marisnigri is a methanogen belonging to the order Methanomicrobiales, and strain JR1 is the type strain of this species. When it was first isolated, this organism was named Methanogenium marisnigri [1], but then later it was transferred to the genus Methanoculleus [2]. The type strain was isolated from sediment of the Black Sea, while another strain was isolated from an anaerobic digestor [2]. Other species of Methanoculleus have been isolated from different types of anaerobic digestors and marine and freshwater sediments (reviewed in [3]). Methanogens have been divided into two groups known as Class I and Class II based on phylogeny [4]. Class I includes the orders Methanococcales, Methanobacteriales, and Methanopyrales, which use H2/CO2 or formate as substrates for methanogenesis, although some can also use alcohols as electron donors. Class II includes the orders Methanosarcinales and Methanomicrobiales. Some of the Methanosarcinales are capable of using various methyl compounds as substrates for methanogenesis including acetate, methylamines, and methanol, but Methanomicrobiales are restricted to the same substrates as the Class I methanogens [3]. Therefore Methanomicrobiales are phylogenetically closer to Methanosarcinales but physiologically more similar to Class I methanogens, making them an interesting target for genome sequencing. In a 2006 Community Sequencing Program (CSP) project, we proposed sequencing two members of the order Methanomicrobiales: M. marisnigri and Methanocorpusculum labreanum. Previously only one genome was available from this order, that of Methanospirillum hungatei. M. marisnigri and M. labreanum are phylogenetically distant from each other and from M. hungatei (Figure 1), and they represent the three phylogenetic families within the order Methanomicrobiales. We report here the sequence and annotation of M. marisnigri type strain JR1.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of selected Methanomicrobiales showing the distance between the three organisms for which complete genomes are available – Methanospirillum hungatei, Methanocorpusculum labreanum, and Methanoculleus marisnigri. The tree uses 16S ribosomal RNA sequences aligned within the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP), and the tree was constructed with the RDP Tree Builder [5]. Methanosarcina barkeri was used as the outgroup. The numbers on the branches represent bootstrap values based on 100 replicates.

Phylogenetic tree of selected Methanomicrobiales showing the distance between the three organisms for which complete genomes are available – Methanospirillum hungatei, Methanocorpusculum labreanum, and Methanoculleus marisnigri. The tree uses 16S ribosomal RNA sequences aligned within the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP), and the tree was constructed with the RDP Tree Builder [5]. Methanosarcina barkeri was used as the outgroup. The numbers on the branches represent bootstrap values based on 100 replicates.

Classification and features

Methanoculleus marisnigri JR1 was isolated from Black Sea sediment at a depth of 0.5-20 cm. The enrichment medium consisted of 30% distilled water and 70% sea water with the addition of acetate, formate, trypticase, yeast extract, vitamin solution, trace mineral solution, and volatile fatty acid solution [1]. Cells were maintained in serum vials under an atmosphere of 80% H2 and 20% CO2 by a modification of the Hungate technique [1]. The physiological characteristics of M. marisnigri were described as follows [1]. The cells were irregular cocci with peritrichous flagella. The cell wall was composed of glycoprotein and lacked peptidoglycan. The optimal growth temperature was 20-25°C with growth observed between 15 and 45°C. The optimal pH for growth was 6.4 with a range of 6.0-7.5. The optimal salt concentration for growth was around 0.1 M NaCl, and growth was observed between 0.0 and 0.7 M NaCl. Neither acetate nor yeast extract was stimulatory for growth. Trypticase was required, and it could not be replaced by Casamino acids or other peptide mixtures. Coenzyme M and Coenzyme F420 were both detected in M. marisnigri. Growth was observed with H2/CO2 or formate but not with acetate or methanol. M. marisnigri was subsequently shown to grow with secondary alcohols as the electron donor for methanogenesis [6]. The physiological and morphological features of M. marisnigri are presented in (Table 1). Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [15]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or another expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Methanoculleus marisnigri was selected for sequencing based upon its phylogenetic position relative to other methanogens of the order Methanomicrobiales. It is part of a Joint Genome Institute 2006 Community Sequencing Program project that included six archaeal genomes selected for their phylogenetic diversity. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2. The complete genome sequence was finished in February, 2007. The GenBank accession number for the project is CP000562. The genome project is listed in the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) [18] as project Gc00512. Sequencing was carried out at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) Production Genomics Facility (PGF) in Walnut Creek, California. Quality assurance using Phred [19,20] was done by JGI-Stanford. Finishing was done by JGI-Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Annotation was done by JGI-Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and by JGI-PGF.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS IDCharacteristicDetails
MIGS-28Libraries used3kb, 6kb and 40kb (fosmid)
MIGS-29Sequencing platformApplied Biosystems 3730
MIGS-31.2Sequencing coverage11×
MIGS-31Finishing qualityFinished
Sequencing qualityless than one error per 50kb
MIGS-30AssemblerPhrap
MIGS-32Gene calling methodCRITICA [16], Glimmer [17]
GenBank IDCP000562
GenBank date of releaseOctober 17, 2007
GOLD IDGc00512
NCBI project ID16330
IMG Taxon ID640069318
MIGS-13Source material identifierATCC 35101
Project relevancephylogenetic diversity

DNA isolation, genome sequencing and assembly

The methods for DNA isolation, genome sequencing and assembly for this genome have previously been published [21].

Genome annotation

Protein-coding genes were identified using a combination of CRITICA [16] and Glimmer [17] followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [22]. GenePRIMP points out cases where gene start sites may be incorrect based on alignment with homologous proteins. It also highlights genes that appear to be broken into two or more pieces, due to a premature stop codon or frameshift, and genes that are disrupted by transposable elements. All of these types of broken and interrupted genes are labeled as pseudogenes. Genes that may have been missed by the gene calling programs are also identified in intergenic regions. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant protein sequence database and the UniProt [23], TIGRFAMs [24], Pfam [25], PRIAM [26], KEGG [27], COG [28], and InterPro [29] databases. If a gene has more than one significant hit against the domain databases, then all nonoverlapping domains are recorded. Signal peptides were identified with SignalP [30], and transmembrane helices were determined with TMHMM [31]. CRISPR elements were identified with the CRISPR Recognition Tool (CRT) [32]. Paralogs are hits of a protein against another protein within the same genome with an e-value of 10-2 or lower. More details about gene annotation procedures can be found at the data processing page of the Integrated Microbial Genomes website. The tRNAScan-SE tool [33] was used to find tRNA genes. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [34].

Genome properties

The genome of M. marisnigri JR1 consists of a single circular chromosome (Figure 2 and Table 3). In comparison with other methanogens, the genome size of 2.48 Mbp is larger than those of Class I methanogens, which tend to be 1.6-1.8 Mbp, but smaller than the genomes of Methanosarcina species and Methanospirillum hungatei, which range between 3.5 and 5.8 Mbp. The G+C percentage of M. marisnigri is 62.1%, the highest among sequenced methanogens. The genome contains 2,560 genes of which 2,506 are protein-coding genes and the remaining 54 are RNA genes. There were only 17 pseudogenes identified, constituting 0.68% of the total genes. In total, 1633 protein-coding genes (65.2%) were assigned a function, with the remaining annotated as hypothetical proteins. The percentage of genes with signal peptides (14.0%) is quite high compared to other methanogens, although several methanogens have similar percentages. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3 and genes belonging to COG functional categories are listed in Table 4.
Figure 2

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3

Genome statistics

Genome characteristicValue% of total
Genome size (bp)2,478,101100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)2,181,39388.0%
DNA G+C content (bp)1,537,98162.1%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes2560100.00%
RNA genes542.1%
rRNA operons1
Protein-coding genes250697.9%
Pseudogenes170.7%
Genes with function prediction163365.2%
Genes in paralog clusters123049.1%
Genes assigned to COGs198579.2%
Genes assigned Pfam domains179071.4%
Genes with signal peptides35214.0%
Genes with transmembrane helices59523.7%
CRISPR repeats0
Table 4

Numbers of genes associated with general COG functional categories.

CodeValue% age  Description
E1395.5  Amino acid transport and metabolism
G773.1  Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
D170.7  Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
N230.9  Cell motility
M1044.2  Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
B50.2  Chromatin structure and dynamics
H1526.1  Coenzyme transport and metabolism
Z00.0  Cytoskeleton
V230.9  Defense mechanisms
C1746.9  Energy production and conversion
W00.0  Extracellular structures
S25510.2  Function unknown
R28611.4  General function prediction only
P943.8  Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
U220.9  Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
I301.2  Lipid transport and metabolism
Y00.0  Nuclear structure
F632.5  Nucleotide transport and metabolism
O843.4  Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
A10.0  RNA processing and modification
L843.4  Replication, recombination and repair
Q150.6  Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
T873.5  Signal transduction mechanisms
K973.9  Transcription
J1536.1  Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
-52120.8  Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Insights from the genome sequence

The genome sequence of M. marisnigri JR1 shows some similarities to Class I methanogens and some to Methanosarcinales but also has some unique features. In common with Class I methanogens, M. marisnigri uses a partial reductive TCA cycle to synthesize 2-oxoglutarate, and it has the Eha membrane-bound hydrogenase. Similar to Methanosarcinales, M. marisnigri has the Ech membrane-bound hydrogenase. A unique feature of M. marisnigri and the other Methanomicrobiales is the presence of anti- and anti-anti-sigma factors, which is surprising as Archaea do not use sigma factors. These anti- and anti-anti-sigma factors must have developed a new function in the Archaea. Phylogenetic analysis of methanogenesis and cofactor biosynthesis enzymes suggests that Methanomicrobiales form a group distinct from other methanogens, and therefore methanogens can be split in to three classes [21]. There are also differences among the Methanomicrobiales. For instance, M. marisnigri is the only one of the three to have the F420-nonreducing hydrogenase, and it is the only one of the three to lack the 14-subunit Mbh membrane-bound hydrogenase. This has implications for the mechanism of methanogenesis: M. marisnigri may couple Coenzyme M-Coenzyme B heterodisulfide reduction to the first step of methanogenesis in the cytoplasm, similar to Class I methanogens [35], while the other Methanomicrobiales may couple heterodisulfide reduction to generation of a membrane ion gradient [21].
MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence Code
Current classificationDomain ArchaeaTAS [8-10
Phylum EuryarchaeotaTAS [11,12]
Class “Methanomicrobia”TAS [13]
Order MethanomicrobialesTAS [14]
Family MethanomicrobiaceaeTAS [14]
Genus MethanoculleusTAS [2]
Species Methanoculleus marisnigriTAS [2]
Gram stainnegative
Cell shapeirregular coccusTAS [1]
Motilityperitrichous flagellaTAS [1]
SporulationnonsporulatingNAS
Temperature range15-45°CTAS [1]
Optimum temperature20-25°CTAS [1]
MIGS-6.3Salinity0.0-0.7 M NaClTAS [1]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementanaerobeTAS [1]
Carbon sourceCO2NAS
Energy sourceH2/CO2, formate, secondary alcoholsTAS [1,6]
MIGS-6Habitatsediment, anaerobic digestorsTAS [1,2]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-livingTAS [1]
MIGS-14PathogenicitynoneNAS
Biosafety level1NAS
IsolationsedimentTAS [1]
MIGS-4Geographic locationBlack SeaTAS [1]
MIGS-5Isolation time1979TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2Latitude-longitudenot reported
MIGS-4.3Depth0.5-20 cmTAS [1]
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot applicable

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [15]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or another expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

  28 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools.

Authors:  Olof Emanuelsson; Søren Brunak; Gunnar von Heijne; Henrik Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group.

Authors:  W E Balch; G E Fox; L J Magrum; C R Woese; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1979-06

8.  Genomic characterization of methanomicrobiales reveals three classes of methanogens.

Authors:  Iain Anderson; Luke E Ulrich; Boguslaw Lupa; Dwi Susanti; Iris Porat; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Magdalena Sieprawska-Lupa; Lakshmi Dharmarajan; Eugene Goltsman; Alla Lapidus; Elizabeth Saunders; Cliff Han; Miriam Land; Susan Lucas; Biswarup Mukhopadhyay; William B Whitman; Carl Woese; James Bristow; Nikos Kyrpides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; John Tate; Jaina Mistry; Penny C Coggill; Stephen John Sammut; Hans-Rudolf Hotz; Goran Ceric; Kristoffer Forslund; Sean R Eddy; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes.

Authors:  Roman L Tatusov; Natalie D Fedorova; John D Jackson; Aviva R Jacobs; Boris Kiryutin; Eugene V Koonin; Dmitri M Krylov; Raja Mazumder; Sergei L Mekhedov; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; B Sridhar Rao; Sergei Smirnov; Alexander V Sverdlov; Sona Vasudevan; Yuri I Wolf; Jodie J Yin; Darren A Natale
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  14 in total

1.  Complete genome sequence of the hydrogenotrophic, methanogenic archaeon Methanoculleus bourgensis strain MS2(T), Isolated from a sewage sludge digester.

Authors:  Irena Maus; Daniel Wibberg; Robbin Stantscheff; Felix-Gregor Eikmeyer; Anja Seffner; Jürgen Boelter; Rafael Szczepanowski; Jochen Blom; Sebastian Jaenicke; Helmut König; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Schlüter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Metagenomics survey unravels diversity of biogas microbiomes with potential to enhance productivity in Kenya.

Authors:  Samuel Mwangangi Muturi; Lucy Wangui Muthui; Paul Mwangi Njogu; Justus Mong'are Onguso; Francis Nyamu Wachira; Stephen Obol Opiyo; Roger Pelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Archaic chaos: intrinsically disordered proteins in Archaea.

Authors:  Bin Xue; Robert W Williams; Christopher J Oldfield; A Keith Dunker; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-05-28

4.  Identification of a novel N-linked glycan on the archaellins and S-layer protein of the thermophilic methanogen, Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus.

Authors:  John F Kelly; Evgeny Vinogradov; Jacek Stupak; Anna C Robotham; Susan M Logan; Alison Berezuk; Cezar M Khursigara; Ken F Jarrell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Characterization of a biogas-producing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Roland Wirth; Etelka Kovács; Gergely Maróti; Zoltán Bagi; Gábor Rákhely; Kornél L Kovács
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Complete genome sequence of Methanoplanus petrolearius type strain (SEBR 4847).

Authors:  Evelyne Brambilla; Olivier Duplex Ngatchou Djao; Hajnalka Daligault; Alla Lapidus; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Matt Nolan; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Johannes Sikorski; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-10-27

7.  Comparative metagenomics of biogas-producing microbial communities from production-scale biogas plants operating under wet or dry fermentation conditions.

Authors:  Yvonne Stolze; Martha Zakrzewski; Irena Maus; Felix Eikmeyer; Sebastian Jaenicke; Nils Rottmann; Clemens Siebner; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Schlüter
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Insights into Ammonia Adaptation and Methanogenic Precursor Oxidation by Genome-Centric Analysis.

Authors:  Miao Yan; Laura Treu; Xinyu Zhu; Hailin Tian; Arianna Basile; Ioannis A Fotidis; Stefano Campanaro; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Genome sequence of the mud-dwelling archaeon Methanoplanus limicola type strain (DSM 2279(T)), reclassification of Methanoplanus petrolearius as Methanolacinia petrolearia and emended descriptions of the genera Methanoplanus and Methanolacinia.

Authors:  Markus Göker; Megan Lu; Anne Fiebig; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Hope Tice; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Shanmugam Mayilraj; Manfred Rohde; John C Detter; Boyke Bunk; Stefan Spring; Reinhard Wirth; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2014-03-15

10.  Draft Genome Sequences of Methanoculleus horonobensis Strain JCM 15517, Methanoculleus thermophilus Strain DSM 2373, and Methanofollis ethanolicus Strain JCM 15103, Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens Belonging to the Family Methanomicrobiaceae.

Authors:  Takashi Narihiro; Hiroyuki Kusada; Yasuko Yoneda; Hideyuki Tamaki
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.