| Literature DB >> 21304656 |
Iain J Anderson, Magdalena Sieprawska-Lupa, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Eileen Dalin, Kerrie Barry, Elizabeth Saunders, Cliff Han, Thomas Brettin, John C Detter, David Bruce, Natalia Mikhailova, Sam Pitluck, Loren Hauser, Miriam Land, Susan Lucas, Paul Richardson, William B Whitman, Nikos C Kyrpides.
Abstract
Methanoculleus marisnigri Romesser et al. 1981 is a methanogen belonging to the order Methanomicrobiales within the archaeal phylum Euryarchaeota. The type strain, JR1, was isolated from anoxic sediments of the Black Sea. M. marisnigri is of phylogenetic interest because at the time the sequencing project began only one genome had previously been sequenced from the order Methanomicrobiales. We report here the complete genome sequence of M. marisnigri type strain JR1 and its annotation. This is part of a Joint Genome Institute 2006 Community Sequencing Program to sequence genomes of diverse Archaea.Entities:
Keywords: Methanomicrobiales; archaea; methanogen
Year: 2009 PMID: 21304656 PMCID: PMC3035220 DOI: 10.4056/sigs.32535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree of selected Methanomicrobiales showing the distance between the three organisms for which complete genomes are available – Methanospirillum hungatei, Methanocorpusculum labreanum, and Methanoculleus marisnigri. The tree uses 16S ribosomal RNA sequences aligned within the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP), and the tree was constructed with the RDP Tree Builder [5]. Methanosarcina barkeri was used as the outgroup. The numbers on the branches represent bootstrap values based on 100 replicates.
Genome sequencing project information
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | 3kb, 6kb and 40kb (fosmid) |
| MIGS-29 | Sequencing platform | Applied Biosystems 3730 |
| MIGS-31.2 | Sequencing coverage | 11× |
| MIGS-31 | Finishing quality | Finished |
| Sequencing quality | less than one error per 50kb | |
| MIGS-30 | Assembler | Phrap |
| MIGS-32 | Gene calling method | CRITICA [ |
| GenBank ID | CP000562 | |
| GenBank date of release | October 17, 2007 | |
| GOLD ID | Gc00512 | |
| NCBI project ID | 16330 | |
| IMG Taxon ID | 640069318 | |
| MIGS-13 | Source material identifier | ATCC 35101 |
| Project relevance | phylogenetic diversity |
Figure 2Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
Genome statistics
| Genome size (bp) | 2,478,101 | 100.00% |
| DNA coding region (bp) | 2,181,393 | 88.0% |
| DNA G+C content (bp) | 1,537,981 | 62.1% |
| Number of replicons | 1 | |
| Extrachromosomal elements | 0 | |
| Total genes | 2560 | 100.00% |
| RNA genes | 54 | 2.1% |
| rRNA operons | 1 | |
| Protein-coding genes | 2506 | 97.9% |
| Pseudogenes | 17 | 0.7% |
| Genes with function prediction | 1633 | 65.2% |
| Genes in paralog clusters | 1230 | 49.1% |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 1985 | 79.2% |
| Genes assigned Pfam domains | 1790 | 71.4% |
| Genes with signal peptides | 352 | 14.0% |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 595 | 23.7% |
| CRISPR repeats | 0 |
Numbers of genes associated with general COG functional categories.
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| E | 139 | 5.5 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| G | 77 | 3.1 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| D | 17 | 0.7 | Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| N | 23 | 0.9 | Cell motility |
| M | 104 | 4.2 | Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis |
| B | 5 | 0.2 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| H | 152 | 6.1 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| Z | 0 | 0.0 | Cytoskeleton |
| V | 23 | 0.9 | Defense mechanisms |
| C | 174 | 6.9 | Energy production and conversion |
| W | 0 | 0.0 | Extracellular structures |
| S | 255 | 10.2 | Function unknown |
| R | 286 | 11.4 | General function prediction only |
| P | 94 | 3.8 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| U | 22 | 0.9 | Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport |
| I | 30 | 1.2 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| Y | 0 | 0.0 | Nuclear structure |
| F | 63 | 2.5 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| O | 84 | 3.4 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| A | 1 | 0.0 | RNA processing and modification |
| L | 84 | 3.4 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| Q | 15 | 0.6 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| T | 87 | 3.5 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| K | 97 | 3.9 | Transcription |
| J | 153 | 6.1 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| - | 521 | 20.8 | Not in COGs |
| MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum | TAS [ | ||
| Class “ | TAS [ | ||
| Order | TAS [ | ||
| Family | TAS [ | ||
| Genus | TAS [ | ||
| Species | TAS [ | ||
| Gram stain | negative | ||
| Cell shape | irregular coccus | TAS [ | |
| Motility | peritrichous flagella | TAS [ | |
| Sporulation | nonsporulating | NAS | |
| Temperature range | 15-45°C | TAS [ | |
| Optimum temperature | 20-25°C | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-6.3 | Salinity | 0.0-0.7 M NaCl | TAS [ |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | anaerobe | TAS [ |
| Carbon source | CO2 | NAS | |
| Energy source | H2/CO2, formate, secondary alcohols | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | sediment, anaerobic digestors | TAS [ |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | free-living | TAS [ |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | none | NAS |
| Biosafety level | 1 | NAS | |
| Isolation | sediment | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Black Sea | TAS [ |
| MIGS-5 | Isolation time | 1979 | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2 | Latitude-longitude | not reported | |
| MIGS-4.3 | Depth | 0.5-20 cm | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | not applicable |
Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [15]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or another expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.