Literature DB >> 21304745

Complete genome sequence of 'Thermobaculum terrenum' type strain (YNP1).

Hajnalka Kiss, David Cleland, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Hope Tice, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Galina Ovchinnikova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Megan Lu, Thomas Brettin, John C Detter, Markus Göker, Brian J Tindall, Brian Beck, Timothy R McDermott, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Jan-Fang Cheng.   

Abstract

'Thermobaculum terrenum' Botero et al. 2004 is the sole species within the proposed genus 'Thermobaculum'. Strain YNP1(T) is the only cultivated member of an acid tolerant, extremely thermophilic species belonging to a phylogenetically isolated environmental clone group within the phylum Chloroflexi. At present, the name 'Thermobaculum terrenum' is not yet validly published as it contravenes Rule 30 (3a) of the Bacteriological Code. The bacterium was isolated from a slightly acidic extreme thermal soil in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming (USA). Depending on its final taxonomic allocation, this is likely to be the third completed genome sequence of a member of the class Thermomicrobia and the seventh type strain genome from the phylum Chloroflexi. The 3,101,581 bp long genome with its 2,872 protein-coding and 58 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chloroflexi; GEBA; Gram-positive; Incertae sedis; extreme thermal soil; non-spore-forming; nonmotile; obligate aerobe; thermoacidophile

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304745      PMCID: PMC3035366          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1153107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain YNP1T (= ATCC BAA-798 = CCMEE 7001) is the proposed type strain of the not yet validly published species ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’, which represents the type species of the not yet validly published genus name ‘Thermobaculum’ [1]. The strain was cultivated from a moderately acidic (pH 3.9) extreme thermal soil in Yellowstone National Park (YNP), Wyoming (USA) for which a thorough chemotaxonomic characterization was published by Botero et al. in 2004 [1]. Although the biological characteristics of the novel strain fulfill all criteria required for the type strain of a novel genus, the proposed name ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’ (= hot small rod belonging to earth/soil) has not yet been validly published (= included in one of the updates of the Validation List that is regularly published in Int J Syst Evol Bacteriol), because rule 30 (3a) of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision), which requires that as of 1st January 2001 the description of a new species [...] must include the designation of a type strain, and a viable culture of that strain must be deposited in at least two publicly accessible service collections in different countries from which subcultures must be available [2]. Strain YNP1T is currently deposited only in two US culture collections. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNP1T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Based on analyses of 16S rRNA gene sequences, strain YNPT is the sole cultured representative of the genus ‘Thermobaculum’. It has no close relatives among the validly described species within the Chloroflexi. The type strain of Sphaerobacter thermophilus [3] shares the highest pairwise similarity (84.9%), followed by Thermoleophilum album and T. minutum [4-6], the two sole members of the actinobacterial order Thermoleophilales [7] with 83.6% sequence identity, and three type strains from the clostridial genus Thermaerobacter (83.2-83.5%) [8], that are currently not placed within a named family. Only four uncultured bacterial clones in GenBank share a higher degree of sequence similarity with strain YNPT than the type strain of the ‘closest’ related species, S. thermophilus. These are clone DRV-SSB031 from rock varnish in the Whipple Mountains, California (92.1%) [9], and clones AY6_14 (FJ891044), AY6_27 (FJ891057) and AY6_18 (FJ891048) from quartz substrates in the hyperarid core of the Atacama Desert (86.9-87.9%). No phylotypes from environmental screening or metagenomic surveys could be linked to ‘T. terrenum’, indicating a rather rare occurrence in the habitats screened thus far (as of September 2010). A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of ‘T. terrenum’ YNPT was compared using BLAST with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [10] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords, weighted by BLAST scores, were determined. The three most frequent genera were Thermobaculum (81.2%), Sphaerobacter (10.3%) and Conexibacter (8.4%). The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'microbial' (3.6%), 'waste' (3.3%), 'soil' (3.3%), 'simulated' (3.2%) and 'level' (3.1%). The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were 'soil' (4.5%), 'structure' (3.3%), 'simulated' (3.2%), 'level/site/waste' (2.9%) and 'core' (2.1%). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNPT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 1,333 nt long partial sequence generated from ATCC BAA-798 (AF391972).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNPT relative to the type strains of the other species within the phylum Chloroflexi . The trees were inferred from 1,316 aligned characters [11,12] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [13] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above the branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [14] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are shown in blue, published genomes [16] and GenBank records [CP000804,CP000875,CP000909,CP001337] in bold, e.g. the GEBA genome S. thermophilus [17].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNPT relative to the type strains of the other species within the phylum Chloroflexi . The trees were inferred from 1,316 aligned characters [11,12] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [13] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above the branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [14] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are shown in blue, published genomes [16] and GenBank records [CP000804,CP000875,CP000909,CP001337] in bold, e.g. the GEBA genome S. thermophilus [17]. The cells of strain YNP1T are 1-1.5 × 2-3 μm long, non-motile rods (Figure 2 and Table 1), enveloped by a thick cell wall external to a cytoplasmic membrane [1]. YNP1T cells occur singly or in pairs, stain Gram-positive in the exponential growth-phase, are obligately aerobic, and non-spore-forming [1]. Colonies are pink-colored and growth occurs best at pH 6-8 (pHopt 7) and 67°C, with a possible temperature range of 41-75°C [1]. Culture doubling time at Topt was 4 hours and increases sharply above 70°C, whereas growth at the temperature extremes was relatively poor [1]. Cells grow best in complex media containing 0.5% NaCl and yeast extract (for growth factors) [1], but also on sucrose, fructose, glucose, ribose, xylose, sorbitol, and xylitol [1]. Strain YNP1T was positive for catalase, urease, and nitrate reduction, but tested negative for oxidases, and was also negative for fermentation of glucose or lactose [1]. No anaerobic growth was observed in the presence of sulfate, nitrate, ferric iron, or arsenate as possible electron acceptors [1]. No chemolithoautotrophic growth was observed in an experimental matrix that included the electron donors H2, H2S, or S0 with oxygen as the electron acceptor. Surprisingly, the in vitro pH optimum of strain YNP1T (pH 7) is much higher than that of the soil from which it was isolated (pH 4-5) [1]. In pure culture, strain YNP1T failed to grow at such low pH values, suggesting that the thermal soil habitat is not optimal for the strain [1].
Figure 2

Transmission electron micrograph of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNP1T, scale bar 0.1 μm

Table 1

Classification and general features of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNP1T according to the MIGS recommendations [18].

MIGS ID    Property    Term    Evidence code
    Current classification    Domain Bacteria    TAS [19]
    Phylum Chloroflexi    TAS [20-23]
    Class Incertae sedis    NAS
    Order Incertae sedis    NAS
    Family Incertae sedis    NAS
    Genus ‘Thermobaculum’    TAS [1]
    Species ‘Thermobaculum terrenum’    TAS [1]
    Type strain    YNP1    TAS [1]
    Gram stain    positive    TAS [1]
    Cell shape    short rods (1-1.5 × 2-3 µm)    TAS [1]
    Motility    non-motile    TAS [1]
    Sporulation    none    TAS [1]
    Temperature range    65°C-92°C    TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature    67°C    TAS [1]
    Salinity    0.5% NaCl    TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement    obligate aerobic    TAS [1]
    Carbon source    glucose, fructose, ribose, sorbitol, sucrose,    xylose, xylitol    TAS [1]
    Energy source    heterotrophic    TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat    thermal soil    TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship    free living    NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity    none    NAS
    Biosafety level    1    TAS [24]
    Isolation    65°C hot extreme thermal soil in small depression site    TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location    Near Rabbit Creek and Firehole River    in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA    TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time    June 1998    NAS
MIGS-4.1    Latitude    44.394    NAS
MIGS-4.2    Longitude    -110.568    NAS
MIGS-4.3    Depth    0 m, soil surface    TAS [1]
MIGS-4.4    Altitude    not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [25]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Transmission electron micrograph of ‘T. terrenum’ strain YNP1T, scale bar 0.1 μm Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [25]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Chemotaxonomy

Murein is present in large amounts, which is consistent with the observed thick (approximately 34 nm) cell walls with a muramic acid content similar to that of Bacillus subtilis [1]. The muramic acid content of strain YNP1T was roughly one quarter of that measured for B. subtilis) but almost 40-fold greater than in E. coli [1]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was not detected [1]. Major fatty acids were dominated by straight and branched chain saturated acids: C18:0 (27.0%); iso-C17:0 (11.6%); iso-C19:0 (12.9%); anteiso-C18:0 (12.5%); C20:0 (16.5%) and C19:0 (6.6%). The pink pigment associated with strain YNP1T exhibited a significant absorption at wavelengths 267, 326, 399, 483, 511, and 549 nm [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [26], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [27]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [15] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID    Property    Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used    Two genomic libraries:    one Sanger 8 kb pMCL200 library,    one 454 pyrosequence standard library
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms    ABI3730, Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage    9.5 × Sanger; 31.8 x pyrosequence
MIGS-30    Assemblers    Newbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap
MIGS-32    Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID    CP001825 (chromosome 1)    CP001826 (chromosome 2)
    Genbank Date of Release    November 23 and 25, 2009
    GOLD ID    Gc01150
    NCBI project ID    29523
    Database: IMG-GEBA    2501533217
MIGS-13    Source material identifier    ATCC BAA-798
    Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. terrenum strain YNP1T, ATCC BAA-798, was grown in ATCC medium 1981 (M-R2A medium) [28] at 60°C. The culture used to prepare genomic DNA (gDNA) for sequencing was only two transfers from the original deposit. The purity of the culture was determined by growth on general maintenance media under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Cells where harvested after 24 hours by centrifugation and gDNA was extracted from lysozyme-treated cells using CTAB and phenol-chloroform. The purity, quality and size of the bulk gDNA preparation was assessed according to DOE-JGI guidelines. Amplification and partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene confirmed the isolate as ‘T. terrenum’. The quantity of the DNA was determined on a 1% agarose gel using mass markers of known concentration supplied by JGI. The average fragment size of the purified gDNA determined to be ~43kb by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 3,926 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible misassemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [29]. A total of 432 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher [30]). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms provided 10.0× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 32,920 Sanger reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [31] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [32]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [33].

Genome properties

The genome consists of two chromosomes: the low G+C (48%) 2,026,947 bp long chromosome 1, and the high G+C (64%) 1,074,634 bp long chromosome 2 (Table 3, Figure 3, Figure 4). Of the 2,930 genes predicted (1,935 on chromosome 1 and 995 on chromosome 2), 2,872 were protein-coding genes, and 58 RNAs; forty one pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (73.4%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value  % of Total
Genome size (bp)   3,101,581  100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)   2,825,726  91.11%
DNA G+C content (bp)   1,659,573  53.51%
Number of replicons   2
Extrachromosomal elements   0
Total genes   2,930  100.00%
RNA genes   58  1.98%
rRNA operons   2
Protein-coding genes   2,872  98.02%
Pseudo genes   41  1.40%
Genes with function prediction   2,151  73.41%
Genes in paralog clusters   439  14.98%
Genes assigned to COGs   2,223  75.78%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   2,308  78.77%
Genes with signal peptides   573  19.56%
Genes with transmembrane helices   777  26.52%
CRISPR repeats   6
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the 2Mb low G+C chromosome 1. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 4

Graphical circular map of the 1 Mb high-G+C chromosome 2. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   Value  %age   Description
J   139  5.6   Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   0  0.0   RNA processing and modification
K   158  6.4   Transcription
L   110  4.5   Replication, recombination and repair
B   1  0.0   Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   18  0.7   Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0  0.0   Nuclear structure
V   56  2.3   Defense mechanisms
T   106  4.3   Signal transduction mechanisms
M   131  5.3   Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   2  0.1   Cell motility
Z   0  0.0   Cytoskeleton
W   0  0.0   Extracellular structures
U   35  1.4   Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O   105  4.3   Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   160  6.5   Energy production and conversion
G   325  13.2   Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   206  8.4   Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   60  2.4   Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   128  5.2   Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   67  2.7   Lipid transport and metabolism
P   134  5.4   Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   44  1.8   Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   316  12.8   General function prediction only
S   162  6.6   Function unknown
-   707  24.1   Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the 2Mb low G+C chromosome 1. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical circular map of the 1 Mb high-G+C chromosome 2. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  22 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria?

Authors:  H-P Klenk; M Göker
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Description of Patulibacter americanus sp. nov., isolated from biological soil crusts, emended description of the genus Patulibacter Takahashi et al. 2006 and proposal of Solirubrobacterales ord. nov. and Thermoleophilales ord. nov.

Authors:  Gundlapally S N Reddy; Ferran Garcia-Pichel
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Reclassification of Sphaerobacter thermophilus from the subclass Sphaerobacteridae in the phylum Actinobacteria to the class Thermomicrobia (emended description) in the phylum Chloroflexi (emended description).

Authors:  Philip Hugenholtz; Erko Stackebrandt
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  4 in total

1.  Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and contextual data of the filamentous soil bacterium Ktedonobacter racemifer type strain (SOSP1-21).

Authors:  Yun-Juan Chang; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Olga Chertkov; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Natalia Ivanova; Galina Ovchinikova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Konstantinos Liolios; Thomas Brettin; Anne Fiebig; Manfred Rohde; Birte Abt; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Community genomic analyses constrain the distribution of metabolic traits across the Chloroflexi phylum and indicate roles in sediment carbon cycling.

Authors:  Laura A Hug; Cindy J Castelle; Kelly C Wrighton; Brian C Thomas; Itai Sharon; Kyle R Frischkorn; Kenneth H Williams; Susannah G Tringe; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 14.650

3.  Proteogenomic analysis of a thermophilic bacterial consortium adapted to deconstruct switchgrass.

Authors:  Patrik D'haeseleer; John M Gladden; Martin Allgaier; Patrik S G Chain; Susannah G Tringe; Stephanie A Malfatti; Joshua T Aldrich; Carrie D Nicora; Errol W Robinson; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Philip Hugenholtz; Blake A Simmons; Steven W Singer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Microbial diversity of thermophiles with biomass deconstruction potential in a foliage-rich hot spring.

Authors:  Li Sin Lee; Kian Mau Goh; Chia Sing Chan; Geok Yuan Annie Tan; Wai-Fong Yin; Chun Shiong Chong; Kok-Gan Chan
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.