Literature DB >> 21304740

Complete genome sequence of Thermosediminibacter oceani type strain (JW/IW-1228P).

Sam Pitluck, Montri Yasawong, Christine Munk, Matt Nolan, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, David Bruce, Chris Detter, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Manfred Rohde, Stefan Spring, Johannes Sikorski, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Thermosediminibacter oceani (Lee et al. 2006) is the type species of the genus Thermosediminibacter in the family Thermoanaerobacteraceae. The anaerobic, barophilic, chemoorganotrophic thermophile is characterized by straight to curved Gram-negative rods. The strain described in this study was isolated from a core sample of deep sea sediments of the Peruvian high productivity upwelling system. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Thermosediminibacter and the seventh genome sequence in the family Thermoanaerobacteraceae. The 2,280,035 bp long genome with its 2,285 protein-coding and 63 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Firmicutes; GEBA; Thermoanaerobacterales; anaerobe; barophile; chemoorganotroph; core sample; deep sea sediment; thermophile; upwelling system

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304740      PMCID: PMC3035372          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1133078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain JW/IW-1228PT (= DSM 16646 = ATCC BAA-1034) is the type strain of Thermosediminibacter oceani, which is the type species of the genus Thermosediminibacter [1], one out of nineteen genera in the family Thermoanaerobacteraceae [2-4]. The generic name derives from the Greek word ‘thermos’ meaning ‘hot’, the Latin word ‘sediment’ and the Latin word ‘bacter’ meaning ‘a rod or staff’, referring to its origin and growth temperature [1]. The species epithet is also derived from the Latin word ‘oceani’ meaning ‘of an ocean’, referring to its origin from the ocean [1]. Strain JW/IW-1228PT was described in 2005 by Lee as T. oceani [1] and validly published in 2006 [5]. Strain JW/IW-1228PT was isolated from a core sediment sample (core 201-1228E-1H-1) at 136-143 cm below the seafloor. The core sample was obtained from the outer shelf edge of the Peruvian high productivity upwelling system. The sea floor there was located at 252 m below the sea level with 12°C mud line temperature. Strain JW/IW-1228PT is of particular interest because it is able to ferment a significant number of polysaccharides [1]. Moreover, the strain JW/IW-1228PT is able to use thiosulfate, elemental sulfur and MnO2 as electron acceptors for growth. The only other species in the genus Thermosediminibacter is T. litoriperuensis, the type strain of which was isolated from the Peru Trench at 5,086 m below sea level with a mud-line temperature of 2°C [1]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for T. oceani JW/IW-1228PT, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of JW/IW-1228PT is 98.4% identical to that of T. litoriperuensis JW/YJL-1230-2T, the type strain of the only other described species with a validly published name in the genus. The sequence similarities between strain JW/IW-1228PT and the type strains of the members of the genera Fervidicola and Caldanaerovirga are 94.4%, with the closest sequence match being that with F. ferrireducens and C. acetigignens [6]. Three significantly similar 16S rRNA gene sequences are known from uncultured clones of Thermovenabulum sp. from GenBank [7]: B5_otu10 (96%, DQ097675), B14_otu11 (95%, DQ097676) and B8_otu12 (95%, DQ097677), all from the Kongdian bed of the Dagang oil field (Hebei province, China) [7,8]. No phylotypes from environmental screening or genomic surveys could be linked to the species T. oceani or even the genus Thermosediminibacter, indicating a rather rare occurrence of these in the habitats screened so far (as of July 2010). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of T. oceani JW/IW-1228PT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by up to one nucleotide and differ by only one nucleotide from the previously published sequence (AY703478).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. oceani JW/IW-1228PT relative to the type strains of the other species within the family Thermoanaerobacteraceae. The trees were inferred from 1,316 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [12]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 850 bootstrap replicates [13] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [14] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [32,33,CP001785,CP001145].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. oceani JW/IW-1228PT relative to the type strains of the other species within the family Thermoanaerobacteraceae. The trees were inferred from 1,316 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [12]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 850 bootstrap replicates [13] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [14] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [32,33,CP001785,CP001145]. The cells of strain JW/IW-1228PT are straight to curved rods which occur singly, in pairs or in chains (Table 1 and Figure 2). They are between 0.2-0.7µm in diameter and 1.5-16 µm in length. In the late-exponential or stationary phase of growth the cells are swollen and subsequently form L-shaped autoplasts [1]. Strain JW/IW-1228PT is Gram-negative, although Thermosediminibacter belongs to the Gram-positive Bacillus-Clostridium subphylum [1]. The cells tend towards elongation and to form aggregates during growth. Motility has not been reported although flagella are observed on the cells (not visible in Figure 2), however, the cells are able to tumble [1], which might imply an impaired flagellar function. Strain JW/IW-1228PT is thermophilic and grows optimally at 68°C; the temperature range for growth is 52-76°C. The optimum pH25°C for growth is 7.5, with a range for growth at 6.3-9.3. The optimum salinity for growth is 1% (w/v), with a salinity range of 0-6% (w/v) [1]. Yeast extract is required for growth. The growth of strain JW/IW-1228PT is not observed on H2/CO2 (80:20, v/v) [1]. The strain produces α-glucosidase [22]. The carbon and energy sources used by JW/IW-1228PT include beef extract, casamino acids, cellobiose, fructose, galactose, glucose, inositol, lactate, maltose, mannose, pyruvate, raffinose, sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, tryptone and xylose when 0.02% w/v of yeast extract is present in growth medium [1]. The fermentation product from glucose is acetate and occasionally trace amounts of propionate, isobutyrate and isovalerate. Acetate is a major product [1]. Strain JW/IW-1228PT does not utilize xylitol [22]. It is able to use thiosulfate, elemental sulfur and MnO2 as electron acceptors for growth. There is no indication that JW/IW-1228PT is able to grow chemolithoautotrophically; it does not reduce sulfate or Fe(III) [1].
Table 1

Classification and general features of T. oceani JW/IW-1228P T according to the MIGS recommendations [15].

MIGS ID   Property   Term     Evidence code
   Current classification   Domain Bacteria     TAS [16]
   Phylum Firmicutes     TAS [17,18]
   Class Clostridia     TAS [2,19]
   Order Thermoanaerobacterales     TAS [2,19,20]
   Family Thermoanaerobacteraceae     TAS [2-4]
   Genus Thermosediminibacter     TAS [1,5]
   Species Thermosediminibacter oceani     TAS [1,5]
   Type strain JW/IW-1228P     TAS [1,5]
   Gram stain   negative     TAS [1]
   Cell shape   straight to curved rods, 0.2-0.7 ×1.5-16 µm.    cells tend to elongate and form   aggregates.     TAS [1]
   Motility   no motility, but tumbling (flagella observed)     TAS [1]
   Sporulation   not observed     TAS [1]
   Temperature range   52–76°C     TAS [1]
   Optimum temperature   68°C     TAS [1]
   Salinity   0-6% w/v NaCl (optimum at 1%)     TAS [1]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   anaerobic     TAS [1]
   Carbon source   carbohydrates     TAS [1]
   Energy source   chemoorganotroph     TAS [1]
MIGS-6   Habitat   ocean subsurface sediments     TAS [1]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   free-living     NAS
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   none     NAS
   Biosafety level   1     TAS [21]
   Isolation   core sample from deep sea sediment     TAS [1]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   subseafloor, outer shelf edge of the    Peruvian high productivity upwelling    system, Peru     TAS [1]
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   2002     NAS
MIGS-4.1   Latitude   approx. S11° 11' 23"     TAS [22]
MIGS-4.2   Longitude   approx. W79° 4' 33"     TAS [22]
MIGS-4.3   Depth   136-143 cm below seafloor     TAS [1]
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   252 m below sea level     TAS [1]

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of T. oceani JW/IW-1228P T

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements Scanning electron micrograph of T. oceani JW/IW-1228P T

Chemotaxonomy

The peptidoglycan structure of strain JW/IW-1228PT is still unknown. The phospholipid fatty acid composition of strain JW/IW-1228PT consists of branched and straight chain saturated acids: iso-C15:0 (56.2%), iso-C17:0 (9.6%), C16:0 (7.5%), anteiso-C15:0 (6.7%), C16:1ω9c (5.6%), C15:0 (5.0%), C18:1 ω 9c (3.3%) and iso-C16:0 (1.9%) [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [24], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [25]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [14] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID    Property    Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used    Tree genomic libraries:    one Sanger 8 kb pMCL200 library,    one 454 pyrosequence standard library and    one Illumina standard library
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms    ABI3730, Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX    Titanium
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage    5.3× Sanger; 34.3× Illumina, 25.4×    pyrosequence
MIGS-30    Assemblers    Newbler version 2.0.0-PostRelease-    07/15/2008, Velvet, phrap
MIGS-32    Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID    CP002131
    Genbank Date of Release    August 5, 2010
    GOLD ID    Gc01361
    NCBI project ID    30983
    Database: IMG-GEBA    2503242007
MIGS-13    Source material identifier    DSM 16646
    Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. oceani JW/IW-1228PT, DSM 16646, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 664 (Thermotoga elfii medium) [26] at 68°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/LALMP for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [25].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger, Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.0.0-PostRelease-07/15/2008 (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisted of 83 contigs in 32 scaffolds which was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus. Illumina GAii sequencing data was assembled with Velvet [27] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. Draft assemblies were based on 166.4 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (www.phrap.com) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [28], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 625 additional reactions and two shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina data was used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [29]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Sanger, Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 65.0 ×coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [30] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [31]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [32].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,280,035 bp long chromosome with a 468% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,348 genes predicted, 2,285 were protein-coding genes, and 63 RNAs; eighty eight pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (73.3%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute  Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)  2,280,035     100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)  1,991,971     87.37%
DNA G+C content (bp)  1,067,515     46.82%
Number of replicons  1
Extrachromosomal elements  0
Total genes  2,348     100.00%
RNA genes  63     2.68%
rRNA operons  3
Protein-coding genes  2,285     97.32%
Pseudo genes  88     3.75%
Genes with function prediction  1,722     73.34%
Genes in paralog clusters  366     15.59%
Genes assigned to COGs  1,751     74.57%
Genes assigned Pfam domains  1,925     81.98%
Genes with signal peptides  280     11.93%
Genes with transmembrane helices  563     23.98%
CRISPR repeats  5
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    Value   %age    Description
J    140   7.3    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0   0.0    RNA processing and modification
K    122   6.4    Transcription
L    191   10.0    Replication, recombination and repair
B    1   0.1    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    35   1.8    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0   0.0    Nuclear structure
V    28   1.5    Defense mechanisms
T    96   5.0    Signal transduction mechanisms
M    107   5.6    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    58   3.0    Cell motility
Z    0   0.0    Cytoskeleton
W    0   0.0    Extracellular structures
U    49   2.6    Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O    58   3.0    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    142   7.4    Energy production and conversion
G    117   6.1    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    147   7.7    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    51   2.7    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    94   4.9    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    33   1.7    Lipid transport and metabolism
P    85   4.5    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    25   1.3    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    171   9.0    General function prediction only
S    158   8.3    Function unknown
-    597   25.4    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  21 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria?

Authors:  H-P Klenk; M Göker
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  The All-Species Living Tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains.

Authors:  Pablo Yarza; Michael Richter; Jörg Peplies; Jean Euzeby; Rudolf Amann; Karl-Heinz Schleifer; Wolfgang Ludwig; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Ramon Rosselló-Móra
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  [Phylogenetic diversity and activity of anaerobic microorganisms of high-temperature horizons of the Dagang Oilfield (China)].

Authors:  T N Nazina; N M Shestakova; A A Grigor'ian; E M Mikhaĭlova; T P Turova; A B Poltaraus; C Feng; F Ni; S S Beliaev
Journal:  Mikrobiologiia       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

7.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  GenBank.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; Eric W Sayers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria).

Authors:  Thomas Cavalier-Smith; Ema E-Yung Chao
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  A genomic signature and the identification of new sporulation genes.

Authors:  Ana B Abecasis; Mónica Serrano; Renato Alves; Leonor Quintais; José B Pereira-Leal; Adriano O Henriques
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  First insights into the syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria--a genetic study.

Authors:  Bettina Müller; Li Sun; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Complete genome sequence of Mahella australiensis type strain (50-1 BON).

Authors:  Johannes Sikorski; Hazuki Teshima; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Marcel Huntemann; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Galina Ovchinikova; Amrita Pati; Roxanne Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Olivier D Ngatchou-Djao; Manfred Rohde; Rüdiger Pukall; Stefan Spring; Birte Abt; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Jonathan A Eisen; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-06-30

5.  Comparative analysis of amino acid sequences from mesophiles and thermophiles in respective of carbon-nitrogen hydrolase family.

Authors:  Sarita Devi; Nikhil Sharma; Tek Chand Bhalla
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Genome-guided analysis of physiological capacities of Tepidanaerobacter acetatoxydans provides insights into environmental adaptations and syntrophic acetate oxidation.

Authors:  Bettina Müller; Shahid Manzoor; Adnan Niazi; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Probing the diversity of chloromethane-degrading bacteria by comparative genomics and isotopic fractionation.

Authors:  Thierry Nadalig; Markus Greule; Françoise Bringel; Frank Keppler; Stéphane Vuilleumier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.