Literature DB >> 21304714

Complete genome sequence of Arcobacter nitrofigilis type strain (CI).

Amrita Pati, Sabine Gronow, Alla Lapidus, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, Olga Chertkov, David Bruce, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, John C Detter, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Arcobacter nitrofigilis (McClung et al. 1983) Vandamme et al. 1991 is the type species of the genus Arcobacter in the family Campylobacteraceae within the Epsilonproteobacteria. The species was first described in 1983 as Campylobacter nitrofigilis [1] after its detection as a free-living, nitrogen-fixing Campylobacter species associated with Spartina alterniflora Loisel roots [2]. It is of phylogenetic interest because of its lifestyle as a symbiotic organism in a marine environment in contrast to many other Arcobacter species which are associated with warm-blooded animals and tend to be pathogenic. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a type stain of the genus Arcobacter. The 3,192,235 bp genome with its 3,154 protein-coding and 70 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacteraceae; GEBA; Spartina alterniflora Loisel; micro-anaerophilic; motile; nitrogen fixation; symbiotic

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304714      PMCID: PMC3035288          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.912121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain CIT (= DSM 7299 = ATCC 33309 = CCUG 15893) is the type strain of the species Arcobacter nitrofigilis, which is the type species of the genus Arcobacter [1]. Strain CIT was isolated from roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel (cordgrass) growing in salty marshes at the East coast of Canada. It was the first description of an organism in this kind of habitat that belonged to the genus Campylobacter, as described based on phenotypic and biochemical traits [2]. The species epithet nitrofigilis means 'nitrogen-fixing' and is based on the outstanding characteristic of this species [3]. The new genus Arcobacter, meaning 'bow-shaped rod', was introduced in 1991 and its separation from the genus Campylobacter was based on DNA-DNA and DNA-rRNA hybridization [1]. Up to now, the genus Arcobacter comprises nine species, some of which are associated with warm-blooded animals whereas others are found in marine environments. Within the Campylobacteraceae several whole-genome sequences have already been deciphered: A. butzleri strain RM4018 [4] (non type strain) is the only member of the genus Arcobacter, as well as genomes from seven species of the genus Campylobacter, and Sulfurospirillum deleyianum [5]. Only few additional strains belonging to the species A. nitrofigilis are known in the literature, with F2176 and F2173 [6] being the closest related ones (99% sequence identity). The type strains of the other species of the genus Arcobacter share 93.8-94.6% 16S rRNA sequence identity with strain CIT, whereas the type strains from other genera in the family Campylobacteraceae share less than 89% sequence identity with strain CIT [7]. There are plenty of phylotypes (uncultured bacteria) known from marine environments such as the ridges flanking crustal fluids in oceanic crust (AY704399, clone FD118-51B-02, 98.6%), sea water from Ishigaki port in Japan (AB262370/-71, 96.4%), a mangrove of the Danshui river estuary of northern Taiwan (DQ234254, 95.8%) [8], costal water in the Bohai Bay, China, (FJ155005, 95.8%), in Black Sea shelf sediments in Romania (AJ271655, 95.8%), or from activated sludge in New Zealand (EU104146, 95.8%). Environmental screens and marine metagenome libraries do not contain more than a handful of sequences with >93% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity indicating a sparse representation of closely related strains in the habitats analyzed (status March 2010). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for A. nitrofigilis strain CIT, together with the description of the complete genome sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The four 16S rRNA gene sequences in the genome differ from each other by up to two nucleotides, and differ by up to three nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (L14627) generated from CCUG 15893, which contains nine ambiguous base calls.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT relative to the type strains of the other genera within the Epsilonproteobacteria. The tree was inferred from 1,379 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11,12] and rooted (as far as possible) in accordance with the current taxonomy [13]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 200 bootstrap replicates [14] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are shown in blue, published genomes [16] in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genome from S. deleyianum [5].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT relative to the type strains of the other genera within the Epsilonproteobacteria. The tree was inferred from 1,379 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11,12] and rooted (as far as possible) in accordance with the current taxonomy [13]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 200 bootstrap replicates [14] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are shown in blue, published genomes [16] in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genome from S. deleyianum [5]. A. nitrofigilis cells are Gram-negative, bow-shaped or curved rods of 1–3 µm length and 0.2–0.9 µm width (Figure 2 and Table 1). Motility is based on a single, polar flagellum and results in rapid corkscrew motion. Older cultures also show coccoid cells [2]. The habitat of all known A. nitrofigilis isolates is either the roots or the sediment around the roots of S. alterniflora Loisel growing in salt marshes [3]. Although no pathogenic association has been described so far, A. nitrofigilis was among five Arcobacter species that were isolated from food samples such as meat and shellfish varieties [27]. The optimum growth temperature of A. nitrofigilis is 30°C, the temperature range is from 10–37°C [28]. Neither spores nor granules are present but a brown pigment is formed from tryptophan [2]. All strains of the species show positive reactions for nitrogenase, catalase and oxidase. Growth occurs under microaerophilic conditions with oxygen as terminal electron acceptor, under anaerobic conditions fumarate or aspartate are necessary, the presence of nitrate is detrimental [2]. Hydrogen is not necessary for growth [1]. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite and sulfide is produced from cysteine [3]. Strain CIT tested positive for urease, other strains of the species do not [3]. The metabolism of A. nitrofigilis is chemoorganotrophic; organic acids and amino acids are used as carbon sources but carbohydrates are neither oxidized nor fermented [2]. All strains of the species are halotolerant. They require a minimum of 0.5% NaCl for growth and can tolerate up to 7% NaCl [28]. A. nitrofigilis is susceptible to cephalothin and nalidixic acid but isresistant to vancomycin [3]. The G+C content of the DNA was determined by thermal denaturation to be 28.0% [3] which is slightly below the 28.4% found in the genome.
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT

Table 1

Classification and general features of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT according to the MIGS recommendations [17]

MIGS ID    Property     Term    Evidence code
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria    TAS [18]
     Phylum ‘Proteobacteria    TAS [19]
     Class Epsilonproteobacteria    TAS [20,21]
     Order Campylobacterales    TAS [20,22]
     Family Campylobacteraceae    TAS [23]
     Genus Arcobacter    TAS [1]
     Species Arcobacter nitrofigilis    TAS [1]
     Type strain CI    TAS [3]
    Gram stain     negative    TAS [2]
    Cell shape     bow-shaped rods    TAS [2]
    Motility     motile    TAS [2]
    Sporulation     non-sporulating    TAS [2]
    Temperature range     mesophile, 10-37°C    TAS [2]
    Optimum temperature     30°C    TAS [24]
    Salinity     halotolerant up to 7% NaCl    TAS [2]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement     microaerophilic    TAS [2]
    Carbon source     organic and amino acids    TAS [1]
    Energy source     chemoorganotroph    TAS [3]
MIGS-6    Habitat     marine    TAS [2]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship     symbiotic    TAS [2]
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity     none    NAS
    Biosafety level     1    TAS [25]
    Isolation     roots of the marshplant Spartina alterniflora    TAS [2]
MIGS-4    Geographic location     Conrads Beach (Dartmouth),     Nova Scotia (Canada)    TAS [2]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time     about or before 1980    TAS [2]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2    Latitude    Longitude     44.65     -63.60    NAS
MIGS-4.3    Depth     unknown
MIGS-4.4    Altitude     sea level

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

The major respiratory quinones are menaquinone 6 and a second atypical menaquinone 6 that has not yet been clearly identified [1]. The major fatty acids in whole cells of A. nitrofigilis are hexadecenoic (C16:0), cis-9-hexadecenoic (cis-C16:1ϖ7c) and cis-9-octadecenoic acid (cis-C18:1ϖ7c) [24]

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [29], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [30]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [15] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property    Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used    Three genomic libraries: 454 pyro-sequence standard library,    454 pyro-sequence 24 kb PE library,    and Illumina stdandard library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms    454 GS FLX, Illumina GAii
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage    43.5× pyrosequence, 15.7× Illumina
MIGS-30   Assemblers    Newbler version 2.0.0-    PostRelease-10/28/2008, phrap
MIGS-32   Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
   INSDC ID    CP001999
   Genbank Date of Release    May 18, 2010
   GOLD ID    Gc01280
   NCBI project ID    32593
   Database: IMG-GEBA    2502545034
MIGS-13   Source material identifier    DSM 7299
   Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A. nitrofigilis strain CIT, DSM 7299, was grown on DSMZ medium 429 (Columbia agar including 5% horse blood) [31] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with lysis modification st/LALMP according to Wu et al. [30].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 50 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 243 bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 24 kb were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. Draft assembly was based on 138 Mb 454 standard and 454 paired end data (498,215 reads). Newbler (Roch, version 2.0.0-PostRelease-10/28/2008) parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The initial Newbler assembly contained 42 contigs in 3 scaffolds. It was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus and collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with Velvet [32], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (www.phrap.com) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing [33]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J-F.Cheng, unpublished). A total of 480 additional Sanger reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [34] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [35]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [36].

Genome properties

The genome is 3,192,235 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with an overall G+C content of 28.4% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,224 genes predicted, 3,154 were protein-coding genes, and 70 RNAs; 28 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (72.1%) were assigned a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)   3,192,235   100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)   3,009,967   94.29%
DNA G+C content (bp)   905,345   28.36%
Number of replicons   1
Extrachromosomal elements   0
Total genes   3,224   100.00%
RNA genes   70   2.17%
rRNA operons   4
Protein-coding genes   3,154   97.83%
Pseudo genes   70   2.17%
Genes with function prediction   2,324   72.08%
Genes in paralog clusters   454   14.08%
Genes assigned to COGs   2,363   73.29%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   2,480   76.92%
Genes with signal peptides   597   18.52%
Genes with transmembrane helices   838   25.99%
CRISPR repeats   1
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value   %age    Description
J    143   5.4    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0   0.0    RNA processing and modification
K    157   5.9    Transcription
L    102   3.9    Replication, recombination and repair
B    0   0.0    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    16   0.6    Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y    0   0.0    Nuclear structure
V    37   1.4    Defense mechanisms
T    267   10.1    Signal transduction mechanisms
M    168   6.3    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    78   3.0    Cell motility
Z    0   0.0    Cytoskeleton
W    0   0.0    Extracellular structures
U    69   2.6    Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O    103   3.9    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    212   8.0    Energy production and conversion
G    114   4.3    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    252   9.5    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    61   2.3    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    128   4.8    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    57   2.2    Lipid transport and metabolism
P    159   6.0    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    38   1.4    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    288   10.9    General function prediction only
S    199   7.5    Function unknown
-    861   26.1    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  27 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Revision of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic descriptions and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov.

Authors:  P Vandamme; E Falsen; R Rossau; B Hoste; P Segers; R Tytgat; J De Ley
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1991-01

5.  Arcobacter halophilus sp. nov., the first obligate halophile in the genus Arcobacter.

Authors:  Stuart P Donachie; John P Bowman; Stephen L W On; Maqsudul Alam
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Prevalence of Arcobacter in meat and shellfish.

Authors:  Luis Collado; Josep Guarro; Maria José Figueras
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  Complete genome sequence and analysis of Wolinella succinogenes.

Authors:  Claudia Baar; Mark Eppinger; Guenter Raddatz; Jörg Simon; Christa Lanz; Oliver Klimmek; Ramkumar Nandakumar; Roland Gross; Andrea Rosinus; Heike Keller; Pratik Jagtap; Burkhard Linke; Folker Meyer; Hermann Lederer; Stephan C Schuster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A new 16S rDNA-RFLP method for the discrimination of the accepted species of Arcobacter.

Authors:  Maria José Figueras; Luis Collado; Josep Guarro
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The complete genome sequence and analysis of the epsilonproteobacterium Arcobacter butzleri.

Authors:  William G Miller; Craig T Parker; Marc Rubenfield; George L Mendz; Marc M S M Wösten; David W Ussery; John F Stolz; Tim T Binnewies; Peter F Hallin; Guilin Wang; Joel A Malek; Andrea Rogosin; Larry H Stanker; Robert E Mandrell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Ecological succession leads to chemosynthesis in mats colonizing wood in sea water.

Authors:  Dimitri Kalenitchenko; Marlène Dupraz; Nadine Le Bris; Carole Petetin; Christophe Rose; Nyree J West; Pierre E Galand
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 2.  Taxonomy, epidemiology, and clinical relevance of the genus Arcobacter.

Authors:  Luis Collado; Maria José Figueras
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Arcobacter peruensis sp. nov., a Chemolithoheterotroph Isolated from Sulfide- and Organic-Rich Coastal Waters off Peru.

Authors:  Cameron M Callbeck; Chris Pelzer; Gaute Lavik; Timothy G Ferdelman; Jon S Graf; Bram Vekeman; Harald Schunck; Sten Littmann; Bernhard M Fuchs; Philipp F Hach; Tim Kalvelage; Ruth A Schmitz; Marcel M M Kuypers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  DddY, a periplasmic dimethylsulfoniopropionate lyase found in taxonomically diverse species of Proteobacteria.

Authors:  Andrew R J Curson; Matthew J Sullivan; Jonathan D Todd; Andrew W B Johnston
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Physiological and genetic description of dissimilatory perchlorate reduction by the novel marine bacterium Arcobacter sp. strain CAB.

Authors:  Charlotte I Carlström; Ouwei Wang; Ryan A Melnyk; Stefan Bauer; Joyce Lee; Anna Engelbrektson; John D Coates
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Complete genome sequence of Sulfurimonas autotrophica type strain (OK10).

Authors:  Johannes Sikorski; Christine Munk; Alla Lapidus; Olivier Duplex Ngatchou Djao; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Hope Tice; Cliff Han; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; David Sims; Linda Meincke; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Manfred Rohde; Elke Lang; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-10-27

7.  Complete genome sequence of the sulfur compounds oxidizing chemolithoautotroph Sulfuricurvum kujiense type strain (YK-1(T)).

Authors:  Cliff Han; Oleg Kotsyurbenko; Olga Chertkov; Brittany Held; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Johannes Sikorski; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; John C Detter
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-03-05

8.  Global distribution patterns of marine nitrogen-fixers by imaging and molecular methods.

Authors:  Juan José Pierella Karlusich; Eric Pelletier; Fabien Lombard; Madeline Carsique; Etienne Dvorak; Sébastien Colin; Marc Picheral; Francisco M Cornejo-Castillo; Silvia G Acinas; Rainer Pepperkok; Eric Karsenti; Colomban de Vargas; Patrick Wincker; Chris Bowler; Rachel A Foster
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The Ruegeria pomeroyi acuI gene has a role in DMSP catabolism and resembles yhdH of E. coli and other bacteria in conferring resistance to acrylate.

Authors:  Jonathan D Todd; Andrew R J Curson; Matthew J Sullivan; Mark Kirkwood; Andrew W B Johnston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Physiological and genomic characterization of Arcobacter anaerophilus IR-1 reveals new metabolic features in Epsilonproteobacteria.

Authors:  Irene Roalkvam; Karine Drønen; Runar Stokke; Frida L Daae; Håkon Dahle; Ida H Steen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.