Literature DB >> 21304705

Complete genome sequence of Sebaldella termitidis type strain (NCTC 11300).

Miranda Harmon-Smith, Laura Celia, Olga Chertkov, Alla Lapidus, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, John C Detter, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Amrita Pati, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Thomas Brettin, Markus Göker, Brian Beck, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Feng Chen.   

Abstract

Sebaldella termitidis (Sebald 1962) Collins and Shah 1986, is the only species in the genus Sebaldella within the fusobacterial family 'Leptotrichiaceae'. The sole and type strain of the species was first isolated about 50 years ago from intestinal content of Mediterranean termites. The species is of interest for its very isolated phylogenetic position within the phylum Fusobacteria in the tree of life, with no other species sharing more than 90% 16S rRNA sequence similarity. The 4,486,650 bp long genome with its 4,210 protein-coding and 54 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Gram-negative; anaerobic; mesophile; non-sporeforming; nonmotile; termite intestine; ‘Fusobacteria’; ‘Leptotrichiaceae’

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304705      PMCID: PMC3035275          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.811799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain NCTC 11300T (= ATCC 33386TM = NCTC 11300) is the type strain of the species Sebaldella termitidis [1]. The strain was first isolated from posterior intestinal content of Reticulitermes lucifugus (Mediterranean termites) by the French microbiologist Madeleine Sebald [1,2], and was initially classified as Bacteroides termitidis [3]. The unusually low G+C content, as well as biochemical features which did not correspond to those known for the other members of the genus Bacteroides [4], and the subsequently described novel 16S rRNA sequences [5] made the position of B. termitidis within the genus Bacteroides appear controversial, and guided Collins and Shah in 1986 to reclassify B. termitidis as the type strain of the novel genus Sebaldella [1]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for S. termitidis NCTC 11300T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

NCTC 11300T represents an isolated species, with no other cultivated strain known in the literature belonging to the species. An uncultured clone with identical 16S rRNA sequence was identified in a mesophilic anaerobic digester that treats municipal wastewater sludge in Clos de Hilde, France [6], and another uncultured clone, PCD-1 (96.1% 16S rRNA sequence identity), was reported from the digestive tract of the ground beetle Poecilus chalcites [7]. The closest related type strains are those of the genus Leptotrichia, which share 85.9 to 89.96% 16S rRNA sequence similarity [8]. Neither environmental screenings nor metagenomic surveys provided any 16S rRNA sequence with significant sequence similarity to NCTC 11300T, indicating that members of the species S. termitidis and the genus Sebaldella are not very frequent in the environment (status February 2010). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of S. termitidis NCTC 11300T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the four identical copies of the 16S rRNA gene in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from ATCC 3386 (M58678), which is missing two nucleotides and contains 30 ambiguous base calls.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. termitidis NCTC 11300T relative to the other type strains within the family ‘Leptotrichiaceae’. The tree was inferred from 1,422 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genomes from Leptotrichia buccalis [13], and Streptobacillus moniliformis [14].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. termitidis NCTC 11300T relative to the other type strains within the family ‘Leptotrichiaceae’. The tree was inferred from 1,422 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genomes from Leptotrichia buccalis [13], and Streptobacillus moniliformis [14]. Cells of strain NCTC 11300T are Gram-negative, obligately anaerobic, nonmotile, nonspore-forming rods of 0.3 to 0.5 x 2 to 12 μm with central swellings (Figure 2 and Table 1) [1]. Cells occur singly, in pairs, as well as in filaments [1]. Colonies on surface are transparent to opaque, circular measuring 1-2 mm in diameter, whereas colonies in deep agar are non pigmented and lenticular [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of S. termitidis NCTC 11300T. (J. Carr, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia). More EM photos of the organism can be found at http://phil.cdc.gov/phil.

Table 1

Classification and general features of S. termitidis NCTC 11300T according to the MIGS recommendations [15]

MIGS ID    Property      Term     Evidence code
    Current classification      Domain Bacteria     TAS [16]
      Phylum Fusobacteria     TAS [17]
      Class ‘Fusobacteria     TAS [17]
      Order ‘Fusobacteriales     TAS [17]
      Family ‘Leptotrichiaceae     TAS [18]
      Genus Sebaldella     TAS [1,19]
      Species Sebaldella termitidis     TAS [1,19]
      Type strain NCTC 11300     TAS [1]
    Gram stain      Gram negative     TAS [1]
    Cell shape      rod-shaped, with central swellings;      occur singly, in pairs and in filaments     TAS [1]
    Motility      nonmotile     TAS [1]
    Sporulation      nonsporulating     TAS [2]
    Temperature range      mesophile     NAS
    Optimum temperature      not determined
    Salinity      not reported
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement      obligate anaerobic     TAS [1]
    Carbon source      glucose and other sugars     TAS [1]
    Energy source      fermentation of glucose and other sugars     TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat      bacterial flora of termite gastrointestinal      tract     TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship      unknown
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity      none reported     NAS
    Biosafety level      2     TAS [20]
    Isolation      posterior intestinal content of termites     TAS [2]
MIGS-4    Geographic location      unknown
MIGS-5    Sample collection time      1962 or before     TAS [1,2]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2    Latitude    Longitude      not reported
MIGS-4.3    Depth      not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude      not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [21]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of S. termitidis NCTC 11300T. (J. Carr, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia). More EM photos of the organism can be found at http://phil.cdc.gov/phil. Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [21]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements. The major end products of the glucose metabolism by strain NCTC 11300T are acetic and lactic acids (with some formic acid) as opposed to succinic and acetic acids dominating in members of the genus Bacteroides [1]. Enzymes of the hexose-monophosphate-shunt are missing, while present in members of the genus Bacteroides [1,4]. A list of additional sugars and alcohols used or not-used for fermentation is provided by Collins and Shah [1].

Chemotaxonomy

The cell wall structure of strain NCTC 11300T has not yet been reported. Nonhydroxylated and 3-hydroxyated fatty acids were present [1]. The major long chain fatty acids are saturated and monounsaturated straight chain acids: C16:0 (37%) and C18:1 (41%), with methyl branched acids being absent [1], as opposed to straight-chain saturated, anteiso- and iso-methyl branched-chain acids in members of the genus Bacteroides, which are missing the monounsaturated acids [1]. Menaquinones were not detected, as opposed to members of the genus Bacteroides [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [22]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [12] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property   Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality   Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used   One genomic 8kb pMCL200 library, one 454    pyrosequence library and one Illumina library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms   Sanger, 454 Titanium, Illumina
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage   9.2× Sanger; 30.3× 454 Titanium
MIGS-30   Assemblers   Newbler, phrap
MIGS-32   Gene calling method   Prodigal, GenePRIMP
   INSDC ID   CP001739 (chromosome),    CP001740, CP001741 (plasmids)
   Genbank Date of Release   November 19, 2009
   GOLD ID   Gc01144
   NCBI project ID   29539
   Database: IMG-GEBA   2501846314
MIGS-13   Source material identifier   ATCC 33386
   Project relevance   Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

S. termitidis NCTC 11300T, ATCC 33386TM, was grown anaerobically in ATCC medium 1490 (Modified chopped meat medium) [23] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from cell paste using a basic CTAB extraction and then quality controlled according to JGI guidelines.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 4,966 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [24] or transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification. A total of 796 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher, unpublished). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 39.5× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 45,934 Sanger and 760,187 pyrosequence reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [25] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [26]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [27].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 4,418,842 bp long chromosome, and two plasmids with 54,160 bp and 13,648 bp length, respectively, with a 33.4% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 4,264 genes predicted, 4,210 were protein-coding genes, and 54 RNAs; 59 pseudogenes were identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (60.4%) were assigned with a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)4,486,650100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)3,918,33587.33%
DNA G+C content (bp)1,497,45033.38%
Number of replicons3
Extrachromosomal elements2
Total genes4,264100.00%
RNA genes541.27%
rRNA operons4
Protein-coding genes4,21098.73%
Pseudogenes591.38%
Genes with function prediction2,57660.41%
Genes in paralog clusters1,25329.39%
Genes assigned to COGs2,29960.95%
Genes assigned Pfam domains2,78765.36%
Genes with signal peptides80118.79%
Genes with transmembrane helices90121.13%
CRISPR repeats1
Figure 3

Graphical circular maps of the chromosome and the two plasmids. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value   %age      Description
J   152   3.6      Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   0   0.0      RNA processing and modification
K   265   6.3      Transcription
L   130   3.1      Replication, recombination and repair
B   0   0.0      Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   22   0.5      Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0   0.0      Nuclear structure
V   47   1.1      Defense mechanisms
T   96   2.3      Signal transduction mechanisms
M   155   3.7      Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N   17   0.4      Cell motility
Z   0   0.0      Cytoskeleton
W   0   0.0      Extracellular structures
U   41   1.0      Intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport
O   71   1.7      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   128   3.0      Energy production and conversion
G   468   11.1      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   219   5.2      Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   93   2.2      Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   106   2.5      Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   59   1.4      Lipid transport and metabolism
P   105   2.5      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   32   0.8      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   403   9.6      General function prediction only
S   241   5.7      Function unknown
-   1,665   39.5      Not in COGs
Graphical circular maps of the chromosome and the two plasmids. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  18 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences.

Authors:  Jongsik Chun; Jae-Hak Lee; Yoonyoung Jung; Myungjin Kim; Seil Kim; Byung Kwon Kim; Young-Woon Lim
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge.

Authors:  Delphine Rivière; Virginie Desvignes; Eric Pelletier; Sébastien Chaussonnerie; Sonda Guermazi; Jean Weissenbach; Tianlun Li; Patricia Camacho; Abdelghani Sghir
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Bacterial communities associated with the digestive tract of the predatory ground beetle, Poecilus chalcites, and their modification by laboratory rearing and antibiotic treatment.

Authors:  R Michael Lehman; Jonathan G Lundgren; Lynn M Petzke
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Complete genome sequence of Leptotrichia buccalis type strain (C-1013-b).

Authors:  Natalia Ivanova; Sabine Gronow; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Feng Chen; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Elizabeth Saunders; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Cliff Han; Sam Pitluck; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Patrick Chain; Christine Rohde; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-09-24

10.  Complete genome sequence of Streptobacillus moniliformis type strain (9901).

Authors:  Matt Nolan; Sabine Gronow; Alla Lapidus; Natalia Ivanova; Alex Copeland; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Feng Chen; Hope Tice; Sam Pitluck; Jan-Fang Cheng; David Sims; Linda Meincke; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Thomas Brettin; Cliff Han; John C Detter; Galina Ovchinikova; Amrita Pati; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Manfred Rohde; Cathrin Spröer; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Patrick Chain
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-12-30
View more
  9 in total

1.  Community members in activated sludge as determined by molecular probe technology.

Authors:  Weihong Xu; Veronica R Brand; Sundari Suresh; Michael A Jensen; Ronald W Davis; Craig S Criddle; Robert P St Onge; Richard W Hyman
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  An expanded collection and refined consensus model of glmS ribozymes.

Authors:  Phillip J McCown; Adam Roth; Ronald R Breaker
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Complete genome sequence of Ilyobacter polytropus type strain (CuHbu1).

Authors:  Johannes Sikorski; Olga Chertkov; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Evelyne Brambilla; Montri Yasawong; Manfred Rohde; Rüdiger Pukall; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-12-15

4.  The UlaG protein family defines novel structural and functional motifs grafted on an ancient RNase fold.

Authors:  Francisco J Fernandez; Fernando Garces; Miguel López-Estepa; Juan Aguilar; Laura Baldomà; Miquel Coll; Josefa Badia; M Cristina Vega
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 5.  Omic research in termites: an overview and a roadmap.

Authors:  Michael E Scharf
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Phylogenetic and comparative genomics of the family Leptotrichiaceae and introduction of a novel fingerprinting MLVA for Streptobacillus moniliformis.

Authors:  Tobias Eisenberg; Ahmad Fawzy; Werner Nicklas; Torsten Semmler; Christa Ewers
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics of Members of the Genus Streptobacillus.

Authors:  Tobias Eisenberg; Werner Nicklas; Norman Mauder; Jörg Rau; Matthias Contzen; Torsten Semmler; Nicola Hofmann; Khayrieh Aledelbi; Christa Ewers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparative genomic characterization of three Streptococcus parauberis strains in fish pathogen, as assessed by wide-genome analyses.

Authors:  Seong-Won Nho; Jun-ichi Hikima; Seong Bin Park; Ho Bin Jang; In Seok Cha; Motoshige Yasuike; Yoji Nakamura; Atsushi Fujiwara; Motohiko Sano; Kinya Kanai; Hidehiro Kondo; Ikuo Hirono; Haruko Takeyama; Takashi Aoki; Tae-Sung Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bacterial Associates of a Gregarious Riparian Beetle With Explosive Defensive Chemistry.

Authors:  Reilly McManus; Alison Ravenscraft; Wendy Moore
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.