Literature DB >> 21304648

Complete genome sequence of Leptotrichia buccalis type strain (C-1013-b).

Natalia Ivanova, Sabine Gronow, Alla Lapidus, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Feng Chen, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Elizabeth Saunders, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Thomas Brettin, John C Detter, Cliff Han, Sam Pitluck, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Konstantinos Mavrommatis, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Patrick Chain, Christine Rohde, Markus Göker, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Leptotrichia buccalis (Robin 1853) Trevisan 1879 is the type species of the genus, and is of phylogenetic interest because of its isolated location in the sparsely populated and neither taxonomically nor genomically adequately accessed family 'Leptotrichiaceae' within the phylum 'Fusobacteria'. Species of Leptotrichia are large, fusiform, non-motile, non-sporulating rods, which often populate the human oral flora. L. buccalis is anaerobic to aerotolerant, and saccharolytic. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of the order 'Fusobacteriales' and no more than the second sequence from the phylum 'Fusobacteria'. The 2,465,610 bp long single replicon genome with its 2306 protein-coding and 61 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  'Leptotrichiaceae'; Fusobacteria; Gram-negative fusiform rods; anaerobic; dental plaque; human oral microflora; non-motile; non-sporulating

Year:  2009        PMID: 21304648      PMCID: PMC3035221          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain C-1013-bT (= DSM 1135 = ATCC 14201 = JCM 12969) is the type strain of Leptotrichia buccalis [1], which is the type species of the genus first adequately described in 1879 by Trevisan to accommodate the oral filamentous bacteria and to separate them from the algae [2,3]. For a while, two entirely different organisms were termed L. buccalis in the literature [3]. One of these was 'Leptothrix buccalis', a name originally employed by Robin in 1853 for filamentous forms which he had seen in wet mounts of tooth scrapings [4]. Over a century of the history of classification and misclassification of L. buccalis was documented by Gilmore et al. 1961 [3]. L. buccalis was among the first bacteria to be described and drawn in the letters of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek [5]. Next to Fusobacterium nucleatum [6], L. buccalis is only the second species from the phylum Fusobacteria for which a complete genome sequence is described. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for L. buccalis strain C-1013-bT together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The primary habitat of L. buccalis and most other Leptotrichia species is the human oral cavity, especially dental plaque. L. buccalis also is found in the female genitourinary tract and the intestinal tract [11,13]. Although L. buccalis and L. buccalis-like bacteria have also occasionally been recovered from blood, mostly in immunocompromised patients, they are not known as causative agents of systemic infections [11,14] even though an endotoxin was documented for the L. buccalis [5,14]. Almost all of the cultivated Leptotrichia isolates cluster in 16S rRNA sequence comparisons with one of the five other type strains of the genus Leptotrichia [11] (Figure 1). Except for the uncultured clone GI5-008-C04 (FJ192568), which has been recovered from screening of a spacecraft assembly clean room during the Phoenix mission, all significantly related phylotypes were from the usual habitats as described above. No phylotypes from environmental screening or genomic surveys could be linked with more than 85% 16S rRNA sequence similarity to L. buccalis (status May 2009).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of L. buccalis C-1013-bT relative to all type strains of the genus Leptotrichia inferred from 1,421 aligned characters [15,16] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [17], and rooted with all type strains of the family Leptotrichiaceae. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates, if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [18] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of L. buccalis C-1013-bT relative to all type strains of the genus Leptotrichia inferred from 1,421 aligned characters [15,16] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [17], and rooted with all type strains of the family Leptotrichiaceae. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates, if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [18] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. Figure. 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of L. buccalis strain C-1013-bT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the five 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome of strain C-1013-bT differ from each other by 5 to 20 nucleotides (up to 1.3%), and by 4 to 16 nucleotides plus 38 ambiguities (total up to 3.6%) from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from NCTC 10429 (X90831). Older cells of L. buccalis strain C-1013-bT are Gram negative, but younger cells that have been in culture for less than six hours are Gram-positive Table 1 [5]. The organism forms long rods, commonly occurring in pairs, and is non-motile [5] (Figure 2). Young colonies are colorless, smooth, shiny, raised and described as “medusa-head” colonies because of filamentous edges [5]. On first isolation, L. buccalis is anaerobic but becomes aerotolerant upon transfer and grows in the presence of air and CO2 [5,13]. L. buccalis is susceptible to many antibiotics but resistant to aminoglycosides [5]. The organism is highly saccharolytic and ferments a range of different sugars [5,13]. The main metabolic end product is lactic acid [13]. The G+C content was already described in 1982 as ‘unusually low’ (25%) [5].
Table 1

Classification and general features of L. buccalis strain C-1013-bT according to the MIGS recommendations [7]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code
Current classificationDomain BacteriaTAS [8]
Phylum 'Fusobacteria'TAS [9]
Class 'Fusobacteria'TAS [9]
Order 'Fusobacteriales'TAS [9]
Family 'Leptotrichiaceae'
Genus LeptotrichiaTAS [2]
Species Leptotrichia buccalisTAS [2]
Type strain C-1013-bTAS [1]
Gram stainnegativeTAS [5]
Cell shapelong rodsTAS [5]
MotilitynonmotileTAS [5]
SporulationnonsporulatingTAS [5]
Temperature rangemesophileNAS
Optimum temperature37°CNAS
SalinitynormalNAS
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementanaerobic on isolation, becomes aerotolerant on further transferTAS [5]
Carbon sourcemono- and disaccharidesTAS [5]
Energy sourcecarbohydratesNAS
MIGS-6Habitatoral cavitiesTAS [5]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree livingNAS
MIGS-14Pathogenicityopportunistic pathogenTAS [5]
Biosafety level1TAS [10]
Isolationhuman oral floraTAS [11]
MIGS-4Geographic locationglobalNAS
MIGS-5Sample collection timemid of 19th centuryTAS [3]
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2Latitude – Longitudenot reported
MIGS-4.3Depthnot reported
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [12]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of L. buccalis stain C-1013-bT (Manfred Rohde, Helmholz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig)

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [12]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements. Scanning electron micrograph of L. buccalis stain C-1013-bT (Manfred Rohde, Helmholz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig)

Chemotaxonomy

The murein of strain C-1013-bT contains meso-2,6-diaminopimelic acid (A2pm), D- and L-alanine, and D-glutamic acid [19]. The strain possesses muramic acid and glucosamine as principal components of its peptidoglycan [19]; type A1γ according to the classification of Schleifer and Kandler [20]. As in other Leptotrichia strains, the fatty acid pattern of L. buccalis is an almost equal mixture of saturated and unsaturated straight chain acids: C16:0 (39%), C14:0 (10%), C18:1 (42%), with about 7% hydroxy acids (C14:0) [11]. The type of menaquinones and polar lipids used by L. buccalis has not been described yet.

Genome sequencing

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [18] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityFinished
MIGS-28Libraries usedThree genomic libraries: two Sanger libraries - 8 kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos and one 454 pyrosequence standard library
MIGS-29Sequencing platformsABI3730, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2Sequencing coverage9.7× Sanger; 42× pyrosequence
MIGS-30AssemblersNewbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap
MIGS-32Gene calling methodProdigal
INSDC / Genbank IDCP001685
Genbank Date of ReleaseSeptember 1, 2009
GOLD IDGc01090
NCBI project ID29445
Database: IMG-GEBA2501416906
MIGS-13Source material identifierDSM 1135
Project relevanceTree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

L. buccalis strain C-1013-bT (DSM 1135) was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 104 (modified PYG-Medium, http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium104.pdf) at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 2,747 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [21]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification. A total of 908 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 51.7× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 28,754 Sanger reads in addition to the 454 based pseudo reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [22] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline (http://geneprimp.jgi-psf.org) [23]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) platform [24].

Genome properties

The genome is 2,345,610 bp long and comprises one circular chromosome with a 29.7% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2367 genes predicted, 2306 were protein coding genes, and 61 RNAs; 86 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the genes (65.4%) were assigned with a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue   % of Total
Genome size (bp)2,465,610100.00%
DNA Coding region (bp)2,139,20686.76%
DNA G+C content (bp)730,94729.65%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes2,367100.00%
RNA genes612.58%
rRNA operons5
Protein-coding genes2,30697.42%
Pseudo genes863.63%
Genes with function prediction1,54765.36%
Genes in paralog clusters40216.98%
Genes assigned to COGs1,,53364.77%
Genes assigned Pfam domains1,57766.62%
Genes with signal peptides43218.25%
Genes with transmembrane helices53022.39%
CRISPR repeats4
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

CodeValue% of total  Description
J1446.2  Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A00.0  RNA processing and modification
K863.7  Transcription
L1245.4  Replication, recombination and repair
B00.0  Chromatin structure and dynamics
D241.0  Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.0  Nuclear structure
V281.2  Defense mechanisms
T472.0  Signal transduction mechanisms
M1124.9  Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N60.3  Cell motility
Z00.0  Cytoskeleton
W00.0  Extracellular structures
U341.5  Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O683.0  Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C793.4  Energy production and conversion
G1104.8  Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E1767.6  Amino acid transport and metabolism
F542.3  Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H803.5  Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I441.9  Lipid transport and metabolism
P843.6  Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q110.5  Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R2068.9  General function prediction only
S1416.1  Function unknown
-77328.1  Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  15 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  A phylogenetic definition of the major eubacterial taxa.

Authors:  C R Woese; E Stackebrandt; T J Macke; G E Fox
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis; Paul Hoover; Jacques Rougemont
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 5.  Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications.

Authors:  K H Schleifer; O Kandler
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1972-12

6.  Purification and quantitative chemical analysis of cell wall peptidoglycans of Leptotrichia buccalis.

Authors:  H Fukuhara; T Umemoto; H Sagawa; K Kato; S Kotani
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Genetic diversity of Leptotrichia and description of Leptotrichia goodfellowii sp. nov., Leptotrichia hofstadii sp. nov., Leptotrichia shahii sp. nov. and Leptotrichia wadei sp. nov.

Authors:  Emenike R K Eribe; Bruce J Paster; Dominique A Caugant; Floyd E Dewhirst; Verlyn K Stromberg; George H Lacy; Ingar Olsen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541).

Authors:  David Sims; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Cliff Han; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Feng Chen; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Patrik D'haeseleer; Patrick Chain; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Susanne Schneider; Markus Göker; Rüdiger Pukall; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-07-20

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  Metabolism of sugars by genetically diverse species of oral Leptotrichia.

Authors:  J Thompson; A Pikis
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.563

2.  Complete genome sequence of Streptobacillus moniliformis type strain (9901).

Authors:  Matt Nolan; Sabine Gronow; Alla Lapidus; Natalia Ivanova; Alex Copeland; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Feng Chen; Hope Tice; Sam Pitluck; Jan-Fang Cheng; David Sims; Linda Meincke; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Thomas Brettin; Cliff Han; John C Detter; Galina Ovchinikova; Amrita Pati; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Manfred Rohde; Cathrin Spröer; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Patrick Chain
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-12-30

3.  Complete genome sequence of Ilyobacter polytropus type strain (CuHbu1).

Authors:  Johannes Sikorski; Olga Chertkov; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Evelyne Brambilla; Montri Yasawong; Manfred Rohde; Rüdiger Pukall; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-12-15

4.  Complete genome sequence of Sebaldella termitidis type strain (NCTC 11300).

Authors:  Miranda Harmon-Smith; Laura Celia; Olga Chertkov; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; John C Detter; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Amrita Pati; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Thomas Brettin; Markus Göker; Brian Beck; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Feng Chen
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-03-30

5.  Phylogenetic and comparative genomics of the family Leptotrichiaceae and introduction of a novel fingerprinting MLVA for Streptobacillus moniliformis.

Authors:  Tobias Eisenberg; Ahmad Fawzy; Werner Nicklas; Torsten Semmler; Christa Ewers
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 6.  Leptotrichia species in human infections II.

Authors:  Emenike R K Eribe; Ingar Olsen
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.474

7.  Composition and Diversity of CRISPR-Cas13a Systems in the Genus Leptotrichia.

Authors:  Shinya Watanabe; Bintao Cui; Kotaro Kiga; Yoshifumi Aiba; Xin-Ee Tan; Yusuke Sato'o; Moriyuki Kawauchi; Tanit Boonsiri; Kanate Thitiananpakorn; Yusuke Taki; Fen-Yu Li; Aa Haeruman Azam; Yumi Nakada; Teppei Sasahara; Longzhu Cui
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Oral microbial community typing of caries and pigment in primary dentition.

Authors:  Yanhui Li; Cheng-Gang Zou; Yu Fu; Yanhong Li; Qing Zhou; Bo Liu; Zhigang Zhang; Juan Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Novel metrics for quantifying bacterial genome composition skews.

Authors:  Lena M Joesch-Cohen; Max Robinson; Neda Jabbari; Christopher G Lausted; Gustavo Glusman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.