Literature DB >> 21304683

Complete genome sequence of Haloterrigena turkmenica type strain (4k).

Elisabeth Saunders, Brian J Tindall, Regine Fähnrich, Alla Lapidus, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Susan Lucas, Feng Chen, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, John C Detter, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Patrick Chain, Sam Pitluck, Amrita Pati, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Thomas Brettin, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Haloterrigena turkmenica (Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1987) Ventosa et al. 1999, comb. nov. is the type species of the genus Haloterrigena in the euryarchaeal family Halobacteriaceae. It is of phylogenetic interest because of the yet unclear position of the genera Haloterrigena and Natrinema within the Halobacteriaceae, which created some taxonomic problems historically. H. turkmenica, was isolated from sulfate saline soil in Turkmenistan, is a relatively fast growing, chemoorganotrophic, carotenoid-containing, extreme halophile, requiring at least 2 M NaCl for growth. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of the genus Haloterrigena, but the eighth genome sequence from a member of the family Halobacteriaceae. The 5,440,782 bp genome (including six plasmids) with its 5,287 protein-coding and 63 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Halobacteriaceae; aerobic; carotenoids-containing; extreme halophile; free-living; non-pathogenic; thermophile

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304683      PMCID: PMC3035258          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.681272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain 4kT (= DSM 5511 = ATCC 51198 = VKM B-1734) is the type strain of the species Haloterrigena turkmenica, which is the type species of the genus Haloterrigena [1,2]. The strain was initially described in 1987 as Halococcus turkmenicus VKM B-1734 (basonym) by Zvyagintseva and Tarasov [3]. In 1999, Ventosa et al. proposed to transfer H. turkmenicus 4k as the type strain of the species H. turkmenica to the new genus Haloterrigena [1], whose name means salt, halos, (-requiring) and born from the earth, terrigena. Inconsistent data published on sequence similarity and DNA-DNA hybridization for some Haloterrigena and Natrinema strains created some confusion and taxonomic problems initially, but the problems were largely resolved in 2003 by Tindall [4], pointing to uncertainty about strain history. It has been suggested that the discrepancies may also be a result of 16S rDNA interoperon heterogeneity [5]. Published data appears to indicate that both strains GSL-11 and JCM 9743 (formally included in the species H. turkmenica by Ventosa et al. [1]) may be members of the genus Natrinema [4,6]. Those strains will not be considered further here. There are no reliable reports of other strains of H. turkmenica having been isolated. 16S rRNA sequence identity with the other seven type strains in the genus, which were mainly isolated from salt lakes, range from 98.0% for H. salina [7] to 94.4% for H. longa [6]. The sequence similarity to the Natrinema type strains is somewhere in-between, 95.2-96.4% [8], underlining the taxonomic problems [4]. The sequence similarity to phylotypes in environmental metagenomic libraries was not above 87%, indicating a rather poor representation of closely related strains in the habitats analyzed (status January 2010). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for H. turkmenica strain 4kT, together with the description of the complete genome sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of H. turkmenica strain 4kT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The three 16S rRNA gene sequences in the genome differ from each other by up to two nucleotides, and differ by up to six nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AB004878) generated from DSM 5511. The difference between the genome data and the previously reported 16S rRNA gene sequences is most likely due to sequencing errors in the previously reported sequence data. As expected, Haloterrigena and Natrinema strains appear as intermixed in the tree, indicating a paraphyletic status of Haloterrigena (within which Natronorubrum and Natrinema branch off) and of Natrinema (within which H. longa is placed) [18].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of H. turkmenica strain 4kT relative to the other species within the genera Haloterrigena and Natrinema and the type strains of the other genera within the family Halobacteriaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,368 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11] and rooted with Natronomonas pharaonis [12]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 800 bootstrap replicates [13] if larger than 60%. Strains with a genome sequencing project registered in GOLD [14] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genomes from Halogeometricum borinquense [15], Halorhabdus utahensis [16], and Halomicrobium mukohataei [17].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of H. turkmenica strain 4kT relative to the other species within the genera Haloterrigena and Natrinema and the type strains of the other genera within the family Halobacteriaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,368 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11] and rooted with Natronomonas pharaonis [12]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 800 bootstrap replicates [13] if larger than 60%. Strains with a genome sequencing project registered in GOLD [14] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genomes from Halogeometricum borinquense [15], Halorhabdus utahensis [16], and Halomicrobium mukohataei [17]. H. turkmenica cells occur mostly as single cells, rarely in pairs or tetrads [1]. They are described as Gram-negative, ovoid to coccoid, 1.5-2 μm in diameter [1], but can also be rod-shaped (Figure 2 and Table 1) [1]. Neither spores, nor flagella, nor lipid granules were reported. Colonies are pigmented red or light pink due of the presence of C5O-carotenoids [1]. Stain 4kT is chemoorganotrophic and aerobic, and requires at least 2 M NaCl [1]. Detailed physiological characteristics were described by Zvyagintseva and Tarasov [3]. The G+C content of DNA was reported to be 59.2-60-2 mol % (Thermal denaturation method [1]), which is significantly less than the 64.3% found in the genome. At optimal growth temperatures, H. turkmenica is the fastest growing member of the Halobacteriaceae, with only 1.5 hours generation time [26]. Besides the chemical characterization of siderophores [29], there are no published reports on the molecular biology of H. turkmenica.
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of H. turkmenica strain 4kT

Table 1

Classification and general features of H. turkmenica 4kT according to the MIGS recommendations [19]

MIGS ID   Property   Term   Evidence code
   Current classification   Domain Archaea   TAS [20]
   Phylum Euryarchaeota   TAS [21,22]
   Class Halobacteria   TAS [23]
   Order Halobacteriales   TAS [24]
   Family Halobacteriacea   TAS [25]
   Genus Haloterrigena   TAS [1]
   Species Haloterrigena turkmenica   TAS [1]
   Type strain 4k   TAS [3]
   Gram stain   negative   TAS [1]
   Cell shape   rods   TAS [1]
   Motility   nonmotile   IDA
   Sporulation   non-sporulating   NAS
   Temperature range   29-57°C   TAS [26]
   Optimum temperature   51°C   TAS [26]
   Salinity   extreme halophile, requires   at least 2% (w/v) NaCl   TAS [1]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   aerobic   TAS [1]
   Carbon source   yeast extract   NAS
   Energy source   chemoorganotroph   TAS [1]
MIGS-6   Habitat   soil   TAS [1]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   free living   NAS
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   none   NAS
   Biosafety level   1   TAS [27]
   Isolation   sulfate saline soil   TAS [3]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   Ashkhabad, Turkmenistan   TAS [3]
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   about or before 1987   TAS [3]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2   Latitude, Longitude   37.950, 58.380   NAS
MIGS-4.3   Depth   unknown
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   unknown

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [28]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of H. turkmenica strain 4kT Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [28]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements. Both diphytanyl moieties (C20, C20) and phytanyl-sesterterpanyl moieties (C20, C25) are present in polar lipids [1]. The presence of both phytanyl and esterterpanyl side chains implies the presence of three different prenyl transferases involved in lipid biosynthesis, which are probably chain length specific as well as stereospecific for the incorporation of the isoprenoid side chains into the glycerol backbone [30]. The presence of significant levels of both the diphytanyl moieties (C20, C20) and phytanyl-esterterpanyl moieties (C20, C25) is characteristic of all members examined of this evolutionary branch of the family Halobacteriaceae. Membrane polar lipids are glycerol-diether analogues of PG, PGP-Me and the disulfated digylcosyl diether lipid S2-DGD (mannose-2,6 disulfate 1→2 glucose-glycerol diether) [31], the characteristic glycolipid of Natrialba asiatica [32]. The presence of respiratory lipoquinones have not been reported, but it may be predicted that MK-8 and MK-8 (VIII-H2) should be present, since this is a feature of all members of the family Halobacteriaceae examined to date.

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [33]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [14] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID  Property  Term
MIGS-31  Finishing quality  Finished
MIGS-28  Libraries used  Three genomic libraries:  one Sanger 8 kb pMCL200 library,  one 454 pyrosequence standard library  and one Illumina standard library
MIGS-29  Sequencing platforms  ABI3730, 454 GS FLX,  and Illumina GA
MIGS-31.2  Sequencing coverage  6.9× Sanger; 19.9× pyrosequence
MIGS-30  Assemblers  Newbler version 1.1.03.24, phrap
MIGS-32  Gene calling method  Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
  Genbank ID  CP001860 (chromosome)  CP001861-CP001866 (plasmids)
  Genbank Date of Release  January 19, 2010
  GOLD ID  Gc01189
  NCBI project ID  30411
  Database: IMG-GEBA  2501939622
MIGS-13  Source material identifier  DSM 5511
  Project relevance  Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

H. turkmenica 4kT, DSM 5511, was grown in DSMZ medium 372 (Halobacteria medium) [34] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with lysis modification L according to Wu et al. [33].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.03.24 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 6,060 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible misassemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [35]. A total of 1,183 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms provided 26.8× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 33,433 Sanger reads and 394,632 pyrosequencing reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [36] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [37]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/er) platform [38].

Genome properties

The genome is 5,440,782 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome of 3,889,038 bp length and six circular plasmids of 15.8 to 698.5 kbp length, with an overall GC content of 64.3% (Table 3 and Figures 3 and 4). Of the 5,350 genes predicted, 5,287 were protein coding genes, and 63 RNAs; 174 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (60.1%) were assigned a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)5,440,782100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)4,524,41283.16%
DNA G+C content (bp)3,496,47964.26%
Number of replicons7
Extrachromosomal elements6
Total genes5,350100.00%
RNA genes631.18%
rRNA operons3
Protein-coding genes5,28798.82%
Pseudo genes1743.25%
Genes with function prediction3,21360.06%
Genes in paralog clusters1,70631.89%
Genes assigned to COGs3,25960.92%
Genes assigned Pfam domains3,20859.96%
Genes with signal peptides62511.68%
Genes with transmembrane helices1,14021.31%
CRISPR repeats1
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 4

Graphical circular map of the six plasmids: pHTUR01 (A), pHTUR02 (B), pHTUR03 (C), pHTUR04 (D), pHTUR05 (E), pHTUR06 (F). Plasmids not drawn to scale.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

CodeValue%age  Description
J1783.4  Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.0  RNA processing and modification
K1903.6  Transcription
L1502.8  Replication, recombination and repair
B30.1  Chromatin structure and dynamics
D350.7  Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.0  Nuclear structure
V440.8  Defense mechanisms
T1613.0  Signal transduction mechanisms
M1252.4  Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N290.5  Cell motility
Z00.0  Cytoskeleton
W00.0  Extracellular structures
U260.5  Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1412.7  Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2584.9  Energy production and conversion
G2214.2  Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E3496.6  Amino acid transport and metabolism
F781.5  Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1893.6  Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1763.3  Lipid transport and metabolism
P2244.2  Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q871.6  Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R63011.9  General function prediction only
S3216.1  Function unknown
-2,09139.5  Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical circular map of the six plasmids: pHTUR01 (A), pHTUR02 (B), pHTUR03 (C), pHTUR04 (D), pHTUR05 (E), pHTUR06 (F). Plasmids not drawn to scale.
  29 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Siderophores of halophilic archaea and their chemical characterization.

Authors:  B P Dave; Kena Anshuman; Puja Hajela
Journal:  Indian J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.818

5.  Living with two extremes: conclusions from the genome sequence of Natronomonas pharaonis.

Authors:  Michaela Falb; Friedhelm Pfeiffer; Peter Palm; Karin Rodewald; Volker Hickmann; Jörg Tittor; Dieter Oesterhelt
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Haloterrigena longa sp. nov. and Haloterrigena limicola sp. nov., extremely halophilic archaea isolated from a salt lake.

Authors:  Heng-Lin Cui; Dilbr Tohty; Pei-Jin Zhou; Shuang-Jiang Liu
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A novel prenyltransferase, farnesylgeranyl diphosphate synthase, from the haloalkaliphilic archaeon, Natronobacterium pharaonis.

Authors:  A Tachibana
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1994-03-21       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Complete genome sequence of Halomicrobium mukohataei type strain (arg-2).

Authors:  Brian J Tindall; Susanne Schneider; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Feng Chen; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Elizabeth Saunders; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Patrick Chain; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Thomas Brettin; Cliff Han; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides; John C Detter
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-11-22

10.  Complete genome sequence of Halogeometricum borinquense type strain (PR3).

Authors:  Stephanie Malfatti; Brian J Tindall; Susanne Schneider; Regine Fähnrich; Alla Lapidus; Kurt Labuttii; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Feng Chen; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Iain Anderson; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Patrik D'haeseleer; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Patrick Chain
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-09-24
View more
  19 in total

1.  Halophiles 2010: life in saline environments.

Authors:  Yanhe Ma; Erwin A Galinski; William D Grant; Aharon Oren; Antonio Ventosa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Stochastic developmental variation, an epigenetic source of phenotypic diversity with far-reaching biological consequences.

Authors:  Günter Vogt
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 3.  Archaeal extrachromosomal genetic elements.

Authors:  Haina Wang; Nan Peng; Shiraz A Shah; Li Huang; Qunxin She
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Acquisition of 1,000 eubacterial genes physiologically transformed a methanogen at the origin of Haloarchaea.

Authors:  Shijulal Nelson-Sathi; Tal Dagan; Giddy Landan; Arnold Janssen; Mike Steel; James O McInerney; Uwe Deppenmeier; William F Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Halocin C8: an antimicrobial peptide distributed among four halophilic archaeal genera: Natrinema, Haloterrigena, Haloferax, and Halobacterium.

Authors:  Alison Besse; Manon Vandervennet; Christophe Goulard; Jean Peduzzi; Stéphanie Isaac; Sylvie Rebuffat; Alyssa Carré-Mlouka
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Quantifying homologous replacement of loci between haloarchaeal species.

Authors:  David Williams; J Peter Gogarten; R Thane Papke
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Diversity and evolution of multiple orc/cdc6-adjacent replication origins in haloarchaea.

Authors:  Zhenfang Wu; Hailong Liu; Jingfang Liu; Xiaoqing Liu; Hua Xiang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  The complete genome sequence of Natrinema sp. J7-2, a haloarchaeon capable of growth on synthetic media without amino acid supplements.

Authors:  Jie Feng; Bin Liu; Ziqian Zhang; Yan Ren; Yang Li; Fei Gan; Yuping Huang; Xiangdong Chen; Ping Shen; Lei Wang; Bing Tang; Xiao-Feng Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sequencing of seven haloarchaeal genomes reveals patterns of genomic flux.

Authors:  Erin A Lynch; Morgan G I Langille; Aaron Darling; Elizabeth G Wilbanks; Caitlin Haltiner; Katie S Y Shao; Michael O Starr; Clotilde Teiling; Timothy T Harkins; Robert A Edwards; Jonathan A Eisen; Marc T Facciotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Amino acid substitutions in cold-adapted proteins from Halorubrum lacusprofundi, an extremely halophilic microbe from antarctica.

Authors:  Shiladitya Dassarma; Melinda D Capes; Ram Karan; Priya Dassarma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.