Literature DB >> 21304671

Complete genome sequence of Pirellula staleyi type strain (ATCC 27377).

Alicia Clum, Brian J Tindall, Johannes Sikorski, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavrommatis, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina, Matt Nolan, Feng Chen, Hope Tice, Sam Pitluck, Jan-Fang Cheng, Olga Chertkov, Thomas Brettin, Cliff Han, John C Detter, Cheryl Kuske, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Galina Ovchinikova, Amrita Pati, Natalia Mikhailova, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Patrick Chain, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Alla Lapidus.   

Abstract

Pirellula staleyi Schlesner and Hirsch 1987 is the type species of the genus Pirellula of the family Planctomycetaceae. Members of this pear- or teardrop-shaped bacterium show a clearly visible pointed attachment pole and can be distinguished from other Planctomycetes by a lack of true stalks. Strains closely related to the species have been isolated from fresh and brackish water, as well as from hypersaline lakes. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first completed genome sequence of the order Planctomyces and only the second sequence from the phylum Planctobacteria/Planctomycetes. The 6,196,199 bp long genome with its 4773 protein-coding and 49 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Gram-negative; Planctomycetaceae; developmental life cycle; mesophile; prosthecate budding bacteria; ‘Planctomycetes’

Year:  2009        PMID: 21304671      PMCID: PMC3035237          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.51657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain ATCC 27377T (= DSM 6068 = ATCC 27377) is the type strain of the species Pirellula staleyi and was originally isolated by James T. Staley in the early 1970s [1,2]. Due to superficially identified similarities with ‘Pasteuria ramosa’ in budding and rosette-forming, strain ATCC 27377T was for several years considered to belong to the genus ‘Pasteuria’ as the type strain of P. ramosa Metchnikoff 1888 [3]. However, Starr et al. [4] considered that this strain did not fit the original description of P. ramosa published by Metchnikoff in 1888 [3] and formally requested that the Judicial Commission rule that it should not be the type of P. ramosa Metchnikoff 1888. An Opinion was published by the Judicial Commission [5] fixing the type of P. ramosa Metchnikoff 1888 as the description of Metchnikoff as amended by Starr et al. [3]. At the same time Starr et al [3] also proposed that ATCC 27377T be used as the type of a new species Planctomyces staleyi. In 1984 Schlesner and Hirsch re-assigned ATCC 27377T to the new genus ‘Pirella’ [6] as the type strain to the only species ‘Pirella staleyi’ [6], but realized three years later that this genus name was as later homonym of Pirella Bainier 1883 [7], a fungus belonging to the Mucorales, and therefore illegitimate according to rule 51b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria [8,9]. In 1987 the strain received its currently validly published name Pirellula staleyi. P. staleyi and close relatives belong to the so called morphotype IV and are of interest because these organisms are usually attached to filamentous algae and cyanobacteria by a holdfast located at the distal end of the fascicle (the multifibrillar major appendage) or at the nonreproductive (nonbudding and nonpiliated) pole of the cell, if a fascicle is not present. P. staleyi is of further interest because of its life cycle (see below). It should be noted that members of the genus Pirellula (P. staleyi, P. marina) and other unnamed strains have been variously considered to be rapidly evolving (tachyletic) or ancient lineages. The transfer of P. marina to Blastopirellula marina and description of Rhodopirellula baltica [10] has called this interpretation into question, a theory that the growing number of genomes in the group may also be used to test. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for P. staleyi ATCC 27377T (Table 1), together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.
Table 1

Classification and general features of P. staleyi ATCC 27377T in accordance with the MIGS recommendations [11]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code
Current classificationDomain Bacteria
Phylum ‘Planctomycetes’TAS [12]
Class PlanctomyceaTAS [12]
Order PlanctomycetalesTAS [13]
Family PlanctomycetaceaeTAS [13]
Genus PirellulaTAS [10]
Species Pirellula staleyiTAS [10]
Type strain ICPB 4128TAS [6]
Gram stainnegativeTAS [6]
Cell shapepear or teardrop shapedTAS [6]
Motilitywith flagellaTAS [6]
Sporulationsporulation has not been reportedNAS [6,14]
Temperature rangemesophile, range has not been determinedTAS [14,15]
Optimum temperature20-25°CTAS [14,16]
Salinity50% artificial seawater (100% ASW = 34.5 ‰ salinity)TAS [6,14]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementaerobicNAS [6,14]
Carbon sourceFucose, pectin, lactose, maltose, melibiose, raffinose, sucrose, and trehaloseTAS [6,14]
Energy sourcecarbohydratesTAS [6,14]
MIGS-6HabitataquaticTAS [17]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-living, but also attached to filamentous algae and cyanobacteriaTAS [17]
MIGS-14Pathogenicitynon pathogenicNAS
Biosafety level1TAS [18]
Isolationfresh and brackish waterTAS [6,17]
MIGS-4Geographic locationLake Lansing, Michigan, USATAS [17]
MIGS-5Sample collection timeearly 1970sTAS [17]
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2Latitude, Longitude42.759, -84.399NAS
MIGS-4.3Depthnot reported
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors, or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors, or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Classification and features

To date, two strains of the species P. staleyi have been described in detail, ATCC 27377T [6,9] and strain ATCC 35122 [15]. Strain ATCC 27377T was isolated from the freshwater Lake Lansing, MI, USA either in 1973 or before [2]. Strain ATCC 35122 was isolated as a “white” subclone of strain ICPB 4232 from a similar habitat, the freshwater Campus Lake, Baton Rouge, LA, USA [15,20]. Both strains are identical in their 16S rRNA gene sequence [15]. Except for an agricultural soil bacterium clone (SC-I-28, AJ252628), and for the isolates ‘Schlesner 516’ and ‘Schlesner 670’ (X81940, X81948) [21], no 16S rRNA gene sequences above 85% sequence similarity were reported in Genbank. Environmental samples from metagenomic surveys also do not surpass 88-90% sequence similarity, indicating that members of the species are not heavily represented in the so far genomically screened habitats (as of August 2009). Interestingly, sequences most closely related to the planktonic, aerobic heterotroph P. staleyi have been reported from anoxic sediments of the productive freshwater lake Priest Pot, Cumbria, UK [22]. Also, Pirellula-like sequences have been recovered from DNA extracted from marine sediments in Pudget Sound [23] and marine snow [24]. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of P. staleyi ATCC 27377T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequence of the sole 16S rRNA gene in the genome is identical to the previously published sequence generated from DSM 6068 (AJ231183).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of P. staleyi ATCC 27377T relative to the other type strains within the family Planctomycetaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,316 aligned characters [25,26] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [27] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [28] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of P. staleyi ATCC 27377T relative to the other type strains within the family Planctomycetaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,316 aligned characters [25,26] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [27] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [28] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. The cell size of strain ATCC 27377T is 0.9-1.0 × 1.0-1.5 µm. The mature cell shape is teardrop- to pear-shaped, with the attachment pole slightly pointed (Figure 2). A fibrillar stalk shape and structure is absent. Crateriform structures are predominantly on the reproductive cell pole only. Occasionally, small crateriform structures may also be observed on the non-reproductive and nonpiliated pole of the cell opposite the budding site [17]. The position of the monotrichous flagellum is at the reproductive cell pole [6,10]. Strain ATCC 27377T produces pigmented colonies and motile daughter and sessile mother cells [14].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of P. staleyi ATCC 27377T

Scanning electron micrograph of P. staleyi ATCC 27377T A unique feature seen in both negatively stained cells and in thin-sectioned cells of strains ATCC 27377T and ATCC 35122 is the occurrence of 'hump' protrusions including both cell wall and cytoplasm [15]. These protrude 50 to 111 nm from the cell and are 200to 260 nm in diameter measured at the base of the structure (from thin sections and negatively stained cells). One or two are visible per cell, and when two are visible these are distributed in a characteristic manner opposite to each other in the cell near the narrow pole [15]. They appear to conform to the definition of prosthecae as cellular appendages or extensions of the cell containing cytoplasm [15,29]. However, the prosthecae of strain ATCC 27377T are distributed further from the narrow cell pole than in strain ATCC 35122 [15]. Functions proposed for the prosthecae include increasing surface area, reproduction, and stalk function [15]. The life cycle of P. staleyi has been described in great detail elsewhere [20]. Briefly, the mature bud develops a sheathed flagellum attached near the piliated pole (opposite the fascicle origin) and becomes a swarmer; the swarmer loses its flagellum and becomes a sessile mother cell (with a distal holdfast and eventually a fascicle at the pole opposite the piliated and budding pole); the mother cell develops a bud; etc [17,20]. Strain ATCC 27377T hydrolyses casein, aesculin, gelatin and starch, but not DNA [14]. It produces H2S from thiosulfate and is negative for lipase (pH 7) and phosphatidyl choline [14]. It utilizes fucose as carbon source, but not glycerol, glutamic acid, or chondroitin sulfate [14]. Contrary to the original description [2], the cells are gram-negative and do not utilize lyxose, D-ribose, fucose, L-rhamnose, fructose, or inulin as a carbon source. Additional characteristics include the following. Pectin, lactose, maltose, melibiose, raffinose, sucrose, and trehalose are utilized as carbon sources. The maximum salt tolerance is 50% artificial seawater (Lyman & Fleming, 1940), with 100% ASW corresponding to 3.5% salinity [4]. The cells are weakly inhibited by artificial light (2,400 lx). The following carbon sources are not utilized: adipate, citrate, I-alanine, I-glutamate, gluconate, and urea [4,7]. Strain ATCC 27377T is resistant to ampicillin and penicillin (1000 µg ml-1), cephalotin (100 µg ml-1), streptomycin (500 µg ml-1) and cycloserine (100 µg ml-1), but not to tetracycline (10 µg ml-1 is lethal) [14]. The primary sequence and secondary structure of the ribonuclease P RNA of strain P. staleyi ATCC 27377T and other planctomycetes has been described in detail and has been evaluated for their suitability as a taxonomic marker [17].

Chemotaxonomy

The cell envelope of strain P. staleyi ATCC 27377T contains no peptidoglycan but consists almost entirely of protein. The cell wall amino acids (molar ratio) are threonine (3.0), glutamate (9.0), cysteine (3.6) and valine (1.7) [ 22]. Further details on the amino acids, NH3, hexosamine and neutral sugar contents of the cell envelope of strain ATCC 27377T are published elsewhere [14]. The major fatty acids (relative %) are 16:0 (33.8), 18:1Δ9 (26.6), 20:1Δ11 (15.7), 17:1Δ9 (14.4), 17:0 (5.3), 16:1Δ9 (3.5), 18:0 (3.3), and 18:1Δ11 (2.0) [14]. The major polyamine is sym-homospermidine [50.2 µmol (g dry weight) –1] [16]. The major respiratory lipoquinone present is MK-6. One of the major phospholipid present that has been identified is phosphatidylglycerol [14]. Other lipids have not been identified based on Rf values and staining behavior, indicating that novel lipids are an important constituent of the cell membrane. The production of spermidine distinguishes it from the closely related R. baltica DSM 10527T and B. marina DSM 3645 T.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [28] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in Genbank NOT YET. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityFinished
MIGS-28Libraries usedOne 8kb pMCL200 genomic libraryOne 454 Pyrosequencing standard library and one Illumina library
MIGS-29Sequencing platformsABI3730, 454 GS FLX, Illumina GA
MIGS-31.2Sequencing coverage10.6x Sanger; 20.4x Pyrosequencing
MIGS-30AssemblersNewbler version 1.1.03.24, PGA
MIGS-32Gene calling methodProdigal, GenePRIMP
INSDC IDN/A
Genbank Date of ReleaseN/A
GOLD IDGi02538
NCBI project ID29845
Database: IMG-GEBA2501533211
MIGS-13Source material identifierDSM 6068
Project relevanceTree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

P. staleyi ATCC 27377T, DSM 6068, was grown in DSMZ medium 595 (Caulobacter Medium, http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php) at 26°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre MGP04100) with doubled volume (2 µl) lysozyme and incubated for one hour at 37°C according to Wu et al. [30].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger, 454 and Illumina sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.03.24 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 6,869 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the PGA (Paracel Genome Assembler) assembler. Possible mis-assemblies were corrected and gaps between contigs were closed by custom primer walks from sub-clones or PCR products. Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. The final assembly consists of 70,045 Sanger and 450,004 pyrosequence reads. Together all sequence types provided 31.0x coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [31] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline (http://geneprimp.jgi-psf.org/) [32]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/er) platform [33].

Genome properties

The genome is 6,196,199 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with a 57.5% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 4,822 genes predicted, 4,773 were protein coding genes, and 49 RNAs. In addition, 56 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (54.5%) were assigned with a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)6,196,199100.00%
DNA Coding region (bp)5,362,66286.55%
DNA G+C content (bp)3,560,62757.46%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes4,822100.00%
RNA genes491.02%
rRNA operons1
Protein-coding genes4,77398.98%
Pseudo genes561.16%
Genes with function prediction2,62954.52%
Genes in paralog clusters4719.77%
Genes assigned to COGs2,75557.13%
Genes assigned Pfam domains2,89560.04%
Genes with signal peptides1,41429.32%
Genes with transmembrane helices1,30927.15%
CRISPR repeats2
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Codevalue% of totalDescription
J1493.1Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A20.0RNA processing and modification
K1984.1Transcription
L1533.2Replication, recombination and repair
B10.0Chromatin structure and dynamics
D210.4Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.0Nuclear structure
V701.5Defense mechanisms
T1974.1Signal transduction mechanisms
M1643.4Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N1593.3Cell motility
Z10.0Cytoskeleton
W00.0Extracellular structures
U1914.0Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1382.9Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1643.4Energy production and conversion
G1693.5Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2134.5Amino acid transport and metabolism
F641.3Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1352.8Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I962.0Lipid transport and metabolism
P1503.1Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q601.3Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R4329.1General function prediction only
S2856.0Function unknown
-201842.3Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  17 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification.

Authors:  T Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial communities in marine sediments.

Authors:  J P Gray; R P Herwig
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Prosthecomicrobium and Ancalomicrobium: new prosthecate freshwater bacteria.

Authors:  J T Staley
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Identification of novel bacterial lineages as active members of microbial populations in a freshwater sediment using a rapid RNA extraction procedure and RT-PCR.

Authors:  Ian P Miskin; Paul Farrimond; Ian M Head
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Taxonomic heterogeneity within the Planctomycetales as derived by DNA-DNA hybridization, description of Rhodopirellula baltica gen. nov., sp. nov., transfer of Pirellula marina to the genus Blastopirellula gen. nov. as Blastopirellula marina comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Pirellula.

Authors:  Heinz Schlesner; Christina Rensmann; Brian J Tindall; Dörte Gade; Ralf Rabus; Stefan Pfeiffer; Peter Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Molecular and ultrastructural confirmation of classification of ATCC 35122 as a strain of Pirellula staleyi.

Authors:  Margaret K Butler; Jenny Wang; Richard I Webb; John A Fuerst
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our concepts of microbial structure and function.

Authors:  John A Fuerst; Evgeny Sagulenko
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Identification of proteins likely to be involved in morphogenesis, cell division, and signal transduction in Planctomycetes by comparative genomics.

Authors:  Christian Jogler; Jost Waldmann; Xiaoluo Huang; Mareike Jogler; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Thorsten Mascher; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Diversity and Cyclical Seasonal Transitions in the Bacterial Community in a Large and Deep Perialpine Lake.

Authors:  Nico Salmaso; Davide Albanese; Camilla Capelli; Adriano Boscaini; Massimo Pindo; Claudio Donati
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Molecular Signatures for the PVC Clade (Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae, and Lentisphaerae) of Bacteria Provide Insights into Their Evolutionary Relationships.

Authors:  Radhey S Gupta; Vaibhav Bhandari; Hafiz Sohail Naushad
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Complete genome sequence of Planctomyces limnophilus type strain (Mü 290).

Authors:  Kurt Labutti; Johannes Sikorski; Susanne Schneider; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Brian J Tindall; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-07-29

6.  Complete genome sequence of Isosphaera pallida type strain (IS1B).

Authors:  Markus Göker; David Cleland; Elizabeth Saunders; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; John C Detter; Brian Beck; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-02-20

7.  Genomic evolution of 11 type strains within family Planctomycetaceae.

Authors:  Min Guo; Qian Zhou; Yizhuang Zhou; Linfeng Yang; Tianxiang Liu; Jinlong Yang; Yanling Chen; Longxiang Su; Jin Xu; Jing Chen; Feng Liu; Jiapeng Chen; Wenkui Dai; Peixiang Ni; Chengxiang Fang; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Complete genome sequence of Planctomyces brasiliensis type strain (DSM 5305(T)), phylogenomic analysis and reclassification of Planctomycetes including the descriptions of Gimesia gen. nov., Planctopirus gen. nov. and Rubinisphaera gen. nov. and emended descriptions of the order Planctomycetales and the family Planctomycetaceae.

Authors:  Carmen Scheuner; Brian J Tindall; Megan Lu; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Jan-Fang Cheng; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Marcel Huntemann; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Ivanova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Cynthia D Jeffries; Loren Hauser; Miriam Land; Romano Mwirichia; Manfred Rohde; Birte Abt; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Markus Göker; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2014-12-08

9.  Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Richard L Hahnke; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Marina García-López; Supratim Mukherjee; Marcel Huntemann; Natalia N Ivanova; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Keys to eukaryality: planctomycetes and ancestral evolution of cellular complexity.

Authors:  John A Fuerst; Evgeny Sagulenko
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.