Literature DB >> 21304636

Complete genome sequence of Actinosynnema mirum type strain (101).

Miriam Land, Alla Lapidus, Shanmugam Mayilraj, Feng Chen, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Olga Chertkov, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Amrita Pati, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia C Jeffries, Thomas Brettin, John C Detter, Cliff Han, Patrick Chain, Brian J Tindall, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Actinosynnema mirum Hasegawa et al. 1978 is the type species of the genus, and is of phylogenetic interest because of its central phylogenetic location in the Actino-synnemataceae, a rapidly growing family within the actinobacterial suborder Pseudo-nocardineae. A. mirum is characterized by its motile spores borne on synnemata and as a producer of nocardicin antibiotics. It is capable of growing aerobically and under a moderate CO(2) atmosphere. The strain is a Gram-positive, aerial and substrate mycelium producing bacterium, originally isolated from a grass blade collected from the Raritan River, New Jersey. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the family Actinosynnemataceae, and only the second sequence from the actinobacterial suborder Pseudonocardineae. The 8,248,144 bp long single replicon genome with its 7100 protein-coding and 77 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actinosynnemataceae; Synnemata; aerial and substrate mycelium; aerobic; mesophile; motile spores; nocardicin A producer; soluble pigments

Year:  2009        PMID: 21304636      PMCID: PMC3035213          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.21137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain 101T (DSM 43827 = ATCC 29888 = NBRC 14064, and other culture collections) is the type strain of Actinosynnema mirum, which is the type species of the genus Actinosynnema [1] (Figure 1). A. mirum was described by Hasegawa et al. in 1978 [1] as an aerobic actinobacterium which forms synnemata (compacted groups of erect hyphae which bear conidia) with zoospores [1]. The organism is of interest due to its position in the tree of life where the small genus Actino-synnema, currently comprising only two species, is located on a rather long branch within the rapidly growing actinobacterial suborder Pseudo-nocardineae [6]. We here present a summary classification and a set of features for A. mirum strain 101T (Table 1), together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. mirum 101T relative to all type strains of the genus and to the type strains of the type species of all other genera within the family. The tree was inferred from 1,491 aligned characters [2,3] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [4] and rooted in accordance with current actinobacterial taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with a type strain genome-sequencing project registered in GOLD [5] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold.

Table 1

Classification and general features of A. mirum 101T in accordance with the MIGS recommendations [7]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code
Current classificationDomain BacteriaPhylum ActinobacteriaClass ActinobacteriaOrder ActinomycetalesSuborder PseudonocardineaeFamily ActinosynnemataceaeGenus ActinosynnemaSpecies Actinosynnema mirumType strain 101TAS [6]TAS [6]TAS [6]TAS [8]TAS [1]TAS [1]
Gram stainpositiveTAS [1]
Cell shapehyphae, aerial and substrate myceliumTAS [1]
Motilitycells nonmotile; spores motileTAS [1]
SporulationsporulatingTAS [1]
Temperature rangemesophilicTAS [1]
Optimum temperature10-30°CTAS [1]
Salinityno growth at 5g NaCl/lTAS [1]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementessentially aerobic; moderate growth under CO2 atmosphereTAS [1]
Carbon sourceglucose, maltose, mannose, cellobioseTAS [1]
Energy sourcechemoorganotrophicTAS [1]
MIGS-6Habitatsoil, river sideTAS [1]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-livingNAS
MIGS-14PathogenicitynoneNAS
Biosafety level1TAS [9]
Isolationgrass bladeTAS [1]
MIGS-4Geographic locationRaritan River, New JerseyTAS [1]
MIGS-5Sample collection timeSeptember 1976TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2Latitude – Longitude40.491816, -74.322087NAS
MIGS-4.3Depthnot reported
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the GeneOntology project [10]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. mirum 101T relative to all type strains of the genus and to the type strains of the type species of all other genera within the family. The tree was inferred from 1,491 aligned characters [2,3] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [4] and rooted in accordance with current actinobacterial taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with a type strain genome-sequencing project registered in GOLD [5] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold. Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the GeneOntology project [10]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Classification and features

No closely related cultivated strains are known from the literature that can be linked to the species A. mirum. Curiously, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the type strains from the two subspecies within the second species of the genus Actinosynnema, A. pretiosum subsp. auranticum (AB303364) and A. pretiosum subsp. pretiosum (AB303365) [11], seem to have an equally or even higher degree of similarity to the 16S rRNA gene sequence derived from the genome sequence reported here than the previously reported gene sequences of strain 101T (see Figure 1). None of the phylotypes reported from environmental screenings or genomic surveys could be linked to A. mirum with a convincing degree of sequence similarity (maximal observed degree of similarity 92%; status June 2009). A. mirum strain 101T cells are non-motile with fine hyphae which form aerial and substrate mycelia. Both the aerial and substrate mycelia are about 0.5 to 1.0 µm in diameter. Aerial mycelia are long branching hyphae, white to pale yellow in color (Figure 2). The substrate mycelia are also long, branching hyphae, white to yellowish orange, and penetrate into the agar medium and form synnemata [1]. Cells stain Gram-positive and are non-acid fast [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of A. mirum 101T. More SEMs of A. mirum can be found in the CompendiumoftheActinobacteria, by Joachim M. Wink, University of Braunschweig.

Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of A. mirum 101T. More SEMs of A. mirum can be found in the CompendiumoftheActinobacteria, by Joachim M. Wink, University of Braunschweig. A. mirum is capable of producing a yellowish-brown soluble pigment on tyrosine agar and a pale greenish pigment on oatmeal agar [1]. Capable of hydrolyzing starch, casein, tyrosine and gelatin, but not xanthine, hypoxanthine, adenine and urea [1]; produces nitrate reductase and phosphatase. Positive for utilization of tartrate, pyruvate, lactate and malate, but negative for benzoate, acetate, citrate and succinate [1]. Acid is produced aerobically from fructose, lactose, maltose, D-mannitol, L-arabinose, D-melibiose, D-mannose, L-rhamnose, xylose, dextrin, galactose, glucose, trehalose, raffinose, starch, sucrose, cellobiose, glycogen and adonitol, but not from inositol, sorbitol, D-ribose, salicin, inulin, glycerol, dulcitol, erythritol, α-methyl-D-glucoside and α-methyl-D-mannoside. A. mirum is a producer of nocardicin antibiotics [12] and inhibits the growth of several Gram-positive bacteria including: Bacillus megaterium, Sarcina lutea, Mycobacterium smegmatis; as well as the filamentous fungi, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium notatum and the yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida tropicalis. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of A. mirum strain 101T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the five 16S rRNA genes in the A. mirum genome differ by no more than one nucleotide (nt) from each other, and by up to six nts from the previously reported reference sequences derived from NBRC 14064 (AF328679) and from DSM 43827 (X84447). The differences between the genome data and the previously reported 16S rRNA gene sequence are probably due to sequencing errors in the previously reported sequence data.

Chemotaxonomy

The peptidoglycan of A. mirum contains meso-diaminopimelic acid in addition to alanine, glutamic acid and glucosamine. Galactose and mannose are present in the cell wall sugars, whereas madurose is absent. Cell wall type III has been detected, as well as whole-cell sugar pattern of type C [1]. The fatty acid pattern of strain 101T is dominated by saturated straight chain acids, C17:0 (15.2%), C16:0 (4.8%), C15:0 (2.6%), and branched chain acids, anteiso-(ai-)C13:0 (11.6%), ai-C15:0 (5.9%), ai-C17:0 (4.5%), ai-C11:0 (2.3%), and iso-(i-)C12:0 (11.3%), i-C16:0 (7.5%), i-C14:0 (3.5%), i-C15:0 (2.1%), i-C11:0 (1.5%). Unsaturated straight chain acids play only a limited role: C17:1 cis9 (11.3%), and C16:1 cis9 (3.4%) are present, whereas unsaturated branched chain fatty acids are absent. Minor amounts of hydroxylated fatty acids were detected: C16:1 2OH (1.0%), ai-C15:0 2OH (0.9%), and C15:0 3OH (0.5%) [Cellular fatty acids data from RM Kroppenstedt, DSMZ, unpublished]. The published literature on the fatty acid patterns is, however, contradictory, with Hasegawa et al. [11], and Yassin et al [13]. emphasizing the presence of branched chain fatty acids (including a 10-methyl C18:0), but neither unsaturated nor hydroxylated fatty acids are reported. The major polar lipids present are: diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl inositol mannosides (PIM) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) [13]. Hydroxy-phosphatidylethanolamine (OH-PE) has been reported by some authors [14,15], but not by others [8,13]. MK-9(H4) and MK-9(H6) are the predominant menaquinones [13].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [5] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank (CP001630). Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityFinished
MIGS-28Libraries usedTwo genomic libraries: 8kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos Sanger libraries.One 454 pyrosequence standard library
MIGS-29Sequencing platformsABI3730, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2Sequencing coverage8.9x Sanger; 20x pyrosequence
MIGS-30AssemblersNewbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap
MIGS-32Gene calling methodProdigal
Genbank IDCP001630
Genbank Date of Releasenot available
GOLD IDGc01024
NCBI project ID19705
Database: IMG-GEBA2501533214
MIGS-13Source material identifierDSM 43827
Project relevanceTree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A. mirum strain 101T, DSM 44827, was grown in DSMZmedium535 (GYM Streptomyces Medium at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with a modified lysis buffer (1 ml achromopeptidase and 0.5 ml lysostaphin added) and one hour incubation at 37°C.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found on the JGIwebsite. 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 10,493 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [16]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification. 1,564 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 28.9x coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 105,508 Sanger reads in addition to the 454 based pseudo reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [17] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [18]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the IntegratedMicrobialGenomes (IMG-ER) platform [19].

Genome properties

The genome is 8,248,144 bp long and comprises one circular chromosome with a 73.7% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 7,174 genes predicted, 7100 were protein coding genes, and 74 RNAs., One hundred and eight four pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of genes (67.3%) of the genes were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The prop-erties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value% of Total
Genome size (bp)8,248,144
DNA Coding region (bp)7,331,69488.89%
DNA G+C content (bp)6,079,61473.71%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes7174
RNA genes741.07%
rRNA operons5
Protein-coding genes710098.93%
Pseudo genes1842.56%
Genes with function prediction483567.37%
Genes in paralog clusters140419.56%
Genes assigned to COGs448762.52%
Genes assigned Pfam domains484967.56%
Genes with signal peptides172223.99%
Genes with transmembrane helices159021.15%
CRISPR repeats0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 21 general COG functional categories

CodeValue%Description
J1822.6Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A20.0RNA processing and modification
K6078.5Transcription
L1732.4Replication, recombination and repair
B20.0Chromatin structure and dynamics
D340.5Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.0Nuclear structure
V961.4Defense mechanisms
T3895.5Signal transduction mechanisms
M2103.0Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N450.6Cell motility
Z10.0Cytoskeleton
W00.0Extracellular structures
U460.6Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1492.1Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C3064.3Energy production and conversion
G4416.2Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E4256.0Amino acid transport and metabolism
F1081.5Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H2233.1Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I2263.2Lipid transport and metabolism
P2413.4Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q2653.7Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R6709.4General function prediction only
S3284.6Function unknown
-261336.8Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  14 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Phylogenetic analysis of Saccharothrix and related taxa: proposal for Actinosynnemataceae fam. nov.

Authors:  D P Labeda; R M Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis; Paul Hoover; Jacques Rougemont
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Revival of the genus Lentzea and proposal for Lechevalieria gen. nov.

Authors:  D P Labeda; K Hatano; R M Kroppenstedt; T Tamura
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Actinosynnema mirum, a new producer of nocardicin antibiotics.

Authors:  K Watanabe; T Okuda; K Yokose; T Furumai; H B Maruyama
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541).

Authors:  David Sims; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Cliff Han; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Feng Chen; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Patrik D'haeseleer; Patrick Chain; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Susanne Schneider; Markus Göker; Rüdiger Pukall; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-07-20

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  16 in total

1.  MbtH homology codes to identify gifted microbes for genome mining.

Authors:  Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Complete Genome Sequence of Actinosynnema pretiosum X47, An Industrial Strain that Produces the Antibiotic Ansamitocin AP-3.

Authors:  Chuanqing Zhong; Gongli Zong; Shulan Qian; Meng Liu; Jiafang Fu; Peipei Zhang; Jun Li; Guangxiang Cao
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Evolutionary divergence of sedoheptulose 7-phosphate cyclases leads to several distinct cyclic products.

Authors:  Shumpei Asamizu; Pengfei Xie; Corey J Brumsted; Patricia M Flatt; Taifo Mahmud
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery.

Authors:  Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Discovery of gene cluster for mycosporine-like amino acid biosynthesis from Actinomycetales microorganisms and production of a novel mycosporine-like amino acid by heterologous expression.

Authors:  Kiyoko T Miyamoto; Mamoru Komatsu; Haruo Ikeda
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Microbial gutta-percha degradation shares common steps with rubber degradation by Nocardia nova SH22a.

Authors:  Quan Luo; Sebastian Hiessl; Anja Poehlein; Alexander Steinbüchel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Microbial genome mining for accelerated natural products discovery: is a renaissance in the making?

Authors:  Brian O Bachmann; Steven G Van Lanen; Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Genome sequence of the ocean sediment bacterium Saccharomonospora marina type strain (XMU15(T)).

Authors:  Hans-Peter Klenk; Megan Lu; Susan Lucas; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Sam Pitluck; Lynne A Goodwin; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Gabriele Pötter; Miriam Land; Natalia Ivanova; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Wen-Jun Li; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-05-15

9.  Comparing the similarity of different groups of bacteria to the human proteome.

Authors:  Brett Trost; Rolando Pajon; Teenus Jayaprakash; Anthony Kusalik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Complete genome sequence of Saccharothrix espanaensis DSM 44229(T) and comparison to the other completely sequenced Pseudonocardiaceae.

Authors:  Tina Strobel; Arwa Al-Dilaimi; Jochen Blom; Arne Gessner; Jörn Kalinowski; Marta Luzhetska; Alfred Pühler; Rafael Szczepanowski; Andreas Bechthold; Christian Rückert
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.