BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer patients with systemic comorbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-six patients who had undergone LADG by a single surgeon were given a physical status classification as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA class) and then divided into 2 criteria groups: criteria I group (ASA 1 vs ASA 2,3,4) and criteria II group (ASA 1,2 vs ASA 3,4). The clinicopathologic data of each patient were reviewed retrospectively and grouped by criteria. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a comorbid disease was 8.1% (11 cases) in ASA class 1, 71.7% (86 cases) in class 2, 95.0% (19 cases) in class 3, and 100% (1 case) in class 4. No statistical difference was found between criteria I and II in terms of operative and postoperative results, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, tumor size, total and positive number of dissected lymph nodes, proximal resection margin from lesion, the rate of open conversion, the duration of hospital stay, the time required before resuming a liquid diet, and the rate of complications, except the distal resection margin in criteria II (all P >0.05). There were no cases of mortality in any criteria group. CONCLUSIONS: LADG would be a safe and feasible operation for patients with gastric cancer with systemic comorbidity, without reducing radicality, losing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, or increasing operative risk.
BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancerpatients with systemic comorbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-six patients who had undergone LADG by a single surgeon were given a physical status classification as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA class) and then divided into 2 criteria groups: criteria I group (ASA 1 vs ASA 2,3,4) and criteria II group (ASA 1,2 vs ASA 3,4). The clinicopathologic data of each patient were reviewed retrospectively and grouped by criteria. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a comorbid disease was 8.1% (11 cases) in ASA class 1, 71.7% (86 cases) in class 2, 95.0% (19 cases) in class 3, and 100% (1 case) in class 4. No statistical difference was found between criteria I and II in terms of operative and postoperative results, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, tumor size, total and positive number of dissected lymph nodes, proximal resection margin from lesion, the rate of open conversion, the duration of hospital stay, the time required before resuming a liquid diet, and the rate of complications, except the distal resection margin in criteria II (all P >0.05). There were no cases of mortality in any criteria group. CONCLUSIONS: LADG would be a safe and feasible operation for patients with gastric cancer with systemic comorbidity, without reducing radicality, losing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, or increasing operative risk.
Authors: Andrea Coratti; Mario Annecchiarico; Michele Di Marino; Edoardo Gentile; Francesco Coratti; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.352