Literature DB >> 21304333

Virtual interactive presence and augmented reality (VIPAR) for remote surgical assistance.

Mahesh B Shenai1, Marcus Dillavou, Corey Shum, Douglas Ross, Richard S Tubbs, Alan Shih, Barton L Guthrie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a highly technical field that combines continuous decision-making with the coordination of spatiovisual tasks.
OBJECTIVE: We designed a virtual interactive presence and augmented reality (VIPAR) platform that allows a remote surgeon to deliver real-time virtual assistance to a local surgeon, over a standard Internet connection.
METHODS: The VIPAR system consisted of a "local" and a "remote" station, each situated over a surgical field and a blue screen, respectively. Each station was equipped with a digital viewpiece, composed of 2 cameras for stereoscopic capture, and a high-definition viewer displaying a virtual field. The virtual field was created by digitally compositing selected elements within the remote field into the local field. The viewpieces were controlled by workstations mutually connected by the Internet, allowing virtual remote interaction in real time. Digital renderings derived from volumetric MRI were added to the virtual field to augment the surgeon's reality. For demonstration, a fixed-formalin cadaver head and neck were obtained, and a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and pterional craniotomy were performed under the VIPAR system.
RESULTS: The VIPAR system allowed for real-time, virtual interaction between a local (resident) and remote (attending) surgeon. In both carotid and pterional dissections, major anatomic structures were visualized and identified. Virtual interaction permitted remote instruction for the local surgeon, and MRI augmentation provided spatial guidance to both surgeons. Camera resolution, color contrast, time lag, and depth perception were identified as technical issues requiring further optimization.
CONCLUSION: Virtual interactive presence and augmented reality provide a novel platform for remote surgical assistance, with multiple applications in surgical training and remote expert assistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21304333     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182077efd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  16 in total

Review 1.  Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls.

Authors:  Wee Sim Khor; Benjamin Baker; Kavit Amin; Adrian Chan; Ketan Patel; Jason Wong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques.

Authors:  Ido Badash; Karen Burtt; Carlos A Solorzano; Joseph N Carey
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dixon; Michael J Daly; Harley Chan; Allan D Vescan; Ian J Witterick; Jonathan C Irish
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Identification and Cost of Potentially Avoidable Transfers to a Tertiary Care Neurosurgery Service: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kuhn; Brian A Warmus; Matthew C Davis; Robert A Oster; Barton L Guthrie
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  A Wearable Augmented Reality Navigation System for Surgical Telementoring Based on Microsoft HoloLens.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Chenmeng Li; Changlin Xiao; Zeshu Zhang; Junqi Ma; Jian Gao; Pengfei Shao; Ian Valerio; Timothy M Pawlik; Chengbiao Ding; Alper Yilmaz; Ronald Xu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  An experimental feasibility study on robotic endonasal telesurgery.

Authors:  Raul Wirz; Luis G Torres; Philip J Swaney; Hunter Gilbert; Ron Alterovitz; Robert J Webster; Kyle D Weaver; Paul T Russell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset.

Authors:  Nelson N Stone; Michael P Wilson; Steven H Griffith; Jos Immerzeel; Frans Debruyne; Michael A Gorin; Wayne Brisbane; Peter F Orio; Laura S Kim; Jonathan J Stone
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-23

8.  Feasibility of telesurgery in the modern era.

Authors:  Muhammad Hammad Malik; Waleed Brinjikji
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2022-03-27

Review 9.  Augmented and Mixed Reality: Technologies for Enhancing the Future of IR.

Authors:  Brian J Park; Stephen J Hunt; Charles Martin; Gregory J Nadolski; Bradford J Wood; Terence P Gade
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Virtual Interactive Presence in Global Surgical Education: International Collaboration Through Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Matthew Christopher Davis; Dang D Can; Jonathan Pindrik; Brandon G Rocque; James M Johnston
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.