Literature DB >> 21303636

Do different body colors and labels of insulin pens enhance a patient's ability to correctly identify pens for injecting long-acting versus short-acting insulins?

Mark Lefkowitz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to characterize how successfully patients with diabetes are able to distinguish between pens of the same pen type containing long- and short-acting insulins.
METHODS: Structured one-on-one interviews were conducted with 400 patients with diabetes in the United States, using either a differentiated (n = 100) or undifferentiated (n = 100) SoloSTAR® (insulin glargine vs insulin glulisine) or (n = 200) FlexPen® (insulin detemir vs insulin aspart). A pair of each pen type was presented simultaneously, and participants were asked to identify the pen that they would use to (1) inject at lunch, (2) inject once daily, and (3) inject at breakfast and how they differentiated between pens. The short-acting insulin pen was then presented, and the interviewer asked whether this was the correct pen to administer insulin once or thrice daily.
RESULTS: More patients successfully identified the correct SoloSTAR pen across the tests vs FlexPen, and the error rate (incorrect selection/inability to select) was significantly lower, respectively [2.7% (n = 8) vs 16.3% (n = 98)]. The most common reason cited for correct responses among all patients was color (of the label/pen, according to pen type).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the full pen body color used on SoloSTAR pens enhances the patient's ability to differentiate between the pens for long- and short-acting insulin and is a notable improvement compared with the standard approach of differing label color.
© 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21303636      PMCID: PMC3045242          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Patient acceptability of a new 3.0 ml pre-filled insulin pen.

Authors:  P D'Eliseo; J Blaauw; Z Milicević; J Wyatt; D A Ignaut; J K Malone
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers.

Authors:  Kent H Summers; Sheryl L Szeinbach; Sheila M Lenox
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 4.  Dose accuracy and injection force dynamics of a novel disposable insulin pen.

Authors:  Alastair Clarke; Geralyn Spollett
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.648

5.  Development of the SoloSTAR insulin pen device: design verification and validation.

Authors:  Andreas Bode
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.648

6.  Safety, efficacy, acceptability of a pre-filled insulin pen in diabetic patients over 60 years old.

Authors:  C Coscelli; S Lostia; M Lunetta; I Nosari; G A Coronel
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.602

7.  Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.

Authors:  Thomas Haak; Steven Edelman; Claudia Walter; Brigitte Lecointre; Gerry Spollett
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Usability of a pre-filled insulin injection device in a 3-month observational survey of everyday clinical practice in Australia.

Authors:  John Carter; Anthony Roberts
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 2.580

9.  Projection of diabetic retinopathy and other major eye diseases among people with diabetes mellitus: United States, 2005-2050.

Authors:  Jinan B Saaddine; Amanda A Honeycutt; K M Venkat Narayan; Xinzhi Zhang; Ron Klein; James P Boyle
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12

10.  A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mary Korytkowski; David Bell; Carol Jacobsen; Rudee Suwannasari
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comment on "Do different body colors and labels of insulin pens enhance a patient's ability to correctly identify pens for injecting long acting versus short-acting insulins?".

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Safeguarding the process of drug administration with an emphasis on electronic support tools.

Authors:  Hanna M Seidling; Anette Lampert; Kristina Lohmann; Julia T Schiele; Alexander J F Send; Diana Witticke; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Analysis: desirable attributes of insulin injection pens that drive patient preference and compliance.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Zahn
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  Outpatient insulin-related adverse events due to mix-up errors: Findings from two national surveillance systems, United States, 2012-2017.

Authors:  Andrew I Geller; Ariane O Conrad; Nina J Weidle; Hina Mehta; Daniel S Budnitz; Nadine Shehab
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.732

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.