OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Finnish version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly Screening (HHIE-S) questionnaire and a simple single-question method in detecting hearing loss. DESIGN: We compared the HHIE-S score and the single question with audiometry results. By analysing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the HHIE-S scores we estimated the appropriate cut-off points for the different degrees of hearing loss. STUDY SAMPLE: 164 home-dwelling subjects in the age cohorts of 70, 75, 80 and 85 years in an industrialized town in Finland filled in the questionnaire, and attended the audiometry. RESULTS: For the detection of moderate or worse hearing loss (i.e., pure tone average at 0.5-4 kHz frequencies >40 dB), the HHIE-S cut-off score of >8 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 59.7%. The single question had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 70.7%. Thus, the single question was equally sensitive and more specific in detecting moderate or worse hearing loss than the HHIE-S score. However, for the detection of mild hearing loss (i.e., pure tone average >25 dB), the HHIE-S was more sensitive but less specific than the single question.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Finnish version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly Screening (HHIE-S) questionnaire and a simple single-question method in detecting hearing loss. DESIGN: We compared the HHIE-S score and the single question with audiometry results. By analysing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the HHIE-S scores we estimated the appropriate cut-off points for the different degrees of hearing loss. STUDY SAMPLE: 164 home-dwelling subjects in the age cohorts of 70, 75, 80 and 85 years in an industrialized town in Finland filled in the questionnaire, and attended the audiometry. RESULTS: For the detection of moderate or worse hearing loss (i.e., pure tone average at 0.5-4 kHz frequencies >40 dB), the HHIE-S cut-off score of >8 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 59.7%. The single question had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 70.7%. Thus, the single question was equally sensitive and more specific in detecting moderate or worse hearing loss than the HHIE-S score. However, for the detection of mild hearing loss (i.e., pure tone average >25 dB), the HHIE-S was more sensitive but less specific than the single question.
Authors: Robert L Folmer; Jay Vachhani; Garnett P McMillan; Charles Watson; Gary R Kidd; M Patrick Feeney Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: Brian M Lin; Wen-Qing Li; Sharon G Curhan; Konstantina M Stankovic; Abrar A Qureshi; Gary C Curhan Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Brian M Lin; Sharon G Curhan; Molin Wang; Brian C Jacobson; Roland Eavey; Konstantina M Stankovic; Gary C Curhan Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2017 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Brian M Lin; Sharon G Curhan; Molin Wang; Roland Eavey; Konstantina M Stankovic; Gary C Curhan Journal: Am J Med Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Peter Molander; Peter Nordqvist; Marie Oberg; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; Gerhard Andersson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 2.692