Literature DB >> 35962308

Validation of a tablet-based assessment of auditory sensitivity for researchers.

Kathryn Wiseman1, Jerry Slotkin2, Meredith Spratford1, Amberlee Haggerty1, Maggie Heusinkvelt1, Sandra Weintraub3, Richard Gershon4, Ryan McCreery5.   

Abstract

Quantifying hearing acuity is increasingly important across a wide range of research areas in the behavioral and neurosciences. Scientists have relied on either self-reported hearing status or the availability of diagnostic hearing assessment in past studies. There remains a need for a valid and reliable assessment of auditory sensitivity that can provide estimates of the magnitude of hearing loss, if present, without requirements for professional audiologists, facilities, and equipment that are needed to conduct a diagnostic hearing assessment. The goal of this experiment was to validate the NIH Toolbox® Hearing Threshold Test (HTT), a tablet-based hearing assessment available via iPad application that uses consumer-grade headphones, on a clinical sample of children and adults with varying degrees of hearing acuity. Electroacoustic analysis of the hearing assessment application and headphones demonstrated acoustic outputs within established conformity standards for hearing assessment. Twenty-seven children and 63 adults participated in a standard diagnostic hearing assessment and the experimental tablet-based assessment. The results showed that thresholds from the tablet-based assessment were highly correlated with thresholds from the clinical hearing assessment (r = .83-.93) for children and adults for all frequencies and across a range of levels of hearing acuity. The HTT also met clinical test-retest reliability standards (Cronbach's α > .86). The tablet-based hearing assessment provides acceptable estimates of hearing levels for children and adults when diagnostic audiometric assessment capabilities are not available.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Children; Hearing assessment; Hearing loss; NIH Toolbox; Tablet; iPad

Year:  2022        PMID: 35962308     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01933-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  33 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  JAMA patient page. Audiometry.

Authors:  Erin Brender; Alison E Burke; Richard M Glass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Death, Depression, Disability, and Dementia Associated With Self-reported Hearing Problems: A 25-Year Study.

Authors:  Hélène Amieva; Camille Ouvrard; Céline Meillon; Laetitia Rullier; Jean-François Dartigues
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Self-Reported Hearing Loss, Hearing Aids, and Cognitive Decline in Elderly Adults: A 25-Year Study.

Authors:  Hélène Amieva; Camille Ouvrard; Caroline Giulioli; Céline Meillon; Laetitia Rullier; Jean-François Dartigues
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.

Authors:  Nuala Beahan; Joseph Kei; Carlie Driscoll; Bruce Charles; Asaduzzaman Khan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Validity of hearing screening using hearTest smartphone-based audiometry: performance evaluation of different response modes.

Authors:  Ana Paula Corona; Silvia Ferrite; Tess Bright; Sarah Polack
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Smartphone-based audiometric test for screening hearing loss in the elderly.

Authors:  Sara Abu-Ghanem; Ophir Handzel; Lior Ness; Miri Ben-Artzi-Blima; Karin Fait-Ghelbendorf; Mordechai Himmelfarb
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  The accuracy of self-reported hearing loss in women aged 60-85 years.

Authors:  K Clark; M Sowers; R B Wallace; C Anderson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review.

Authors:  Tess Bright; Danuk Pallawela
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2016-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.