Literature DB >> 21301849

Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems.

Magnus Bordewich1, Charles Semple.   

Abstract

Arising in the context of biodiversity conservation, the Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection (BNRS) problem is to select, subject to budgetary constraints, a set of regions to conserve so that the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of the set of species contained within those regions is maximized. Here PD is measured across either a single rooted tree or a single unrooted tree. Nevertheless, in both settings, this problem is NP-hard. However, it was recently shown that, for each setting, there is a polynomial-time [Formula: see text] -approximation algorithm for it and that this algorithm is tight. In the first part of the paper, we consider two extensions of BNRS. In the rooted setting we additionally allow for the disappearance of features, for varying survival probabilities across species, and for PD to be measured across multiple trees. In the unrooted setting, we extend to arbitrary split systems. We show that, despite these additional allowances, there remains a polynomial-time (1 - 1/e)-approximation algorithm for each extension. In the second part of the paper, we resolve a complexity problem on computing PD across an arbitrary split system left open by Spillner et al. © Springer-Verlag 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21301849     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-011-0405-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  11 in total

1.  Comparative avian phylogeography of Cameroon and equatorial Guinea mountains: implications for conservation.

Authors:  T B Smith; K Holder; D Girman; K O'Keefe; B Larison; Y Chan
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Taxon Selection under Split Diversity.

Authors:  Bui Quang Minh; Steffen Klaere; Arndt von Haeseler
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Phylogenetic diversity and the greedy algorithm.

Authors:  Mike Steel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Optimizing phylogenetic diversity under constraints.

Authors:  Vincent Moulton; Charles Semple; Mike Steel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Resource-aware taxon selection for maximizing phylogenetic diversity.

Authors:  Fabio Pardi; Nick Goldman
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Selecting taxa to save or sequence: desirable criteria and a greedy solution.

Authors:  Magnus Bordewich; Allen G Rodrigo; Charles Semple
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Computing phylogenetic diversity for split systems.

Authors:  Andreas Spillner; Binh T Nguyen; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Nature reserve selection problem: a tight approximation algorithm.

Authors:  Magnus Bordewich; Charles Semple
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity.

Authors:  D P Faith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Species choice for comparative genomics: being greedy works.

Authors:  Fabio Pardi; Nick Goldman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phylogeny, extinction and conservation: embracing uncertainties in a time of urgency.

Authors:  Félix Forest; Keith A Crandall; Mark W Chase; Daniel P Faith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Climate change impacts on the tree of life: changes in phylogenetic diversity illustrated for acropora corals.

Authors:  Daniel P Faith; Zoe T Richards
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.