Literature DB >> 19085326

Selecting taxa to save or sequence: desirable criteria and a greedy solution.

Magnus Bordewich1, Allen G Rodrigo, Charles Semple.   

Abstract

Three desirable properties for any method of selecting a subset of evolutionary units (EUs) for conservation or for genomic sequencing are discussed. These properties are spread, stability, and applicability. We are motivated by a practical case in which the maximization of phylogenetic diversity (PD), which has been suggested as a suitable method, appears to lead to counterintuitive collections of EUs and does not meet these three criteria. We define a simple greedy algorithm (GREEDYMMD) as a close approximation to choosing the subset that maximizes the minimum pairwise distance (MMD) between EUs. GREEDYMMD satisfies our three criteria and may be a useful alternative to PD in real-world situations. In particular, we show that this method of selection is suitable under a model of biodiversity in which features arise and/or disappear during evolution. We also show that if distances between EUs satisfy the ultrametric condition, then GREEDYMMD delivers an optimal subset of EUs that maximizes both the minimum pairwise distance and the PD. Finally, because GREEDYMMD works with distances and does not require a tree, it is readily applicable to many data sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19085326     DOI: 10.1080/10635150802552831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  8 in total

1.  Minimizing the average distance to a closest leaf in a phylogenetic tree.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Aaron Gallagher; Connor O McCoy
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Budgeted Nature Reserve Selection with diversity feature loss and arbitrary split systems.

Authors:  Magnus Bordewich; Charles Semple
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Maximum levels of global phylogenetic diversity efficiently capture plant services for humankind.

Authors:  Rafael Molina-Venegas; Miguel Á Rodríguez; Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana; Cristina Ronquillo; David J Mabberley
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Phylogenetic representativeness: a new method for evaluating taxon sampling in evolutionary studies.

Authors:  Federico Plazzi; Ronald R Ferrucci; Marco Passamonti
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf.

Authors:  Jonathan T L Kang; Peng Zhang; Sebastian Zöllner; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Conserving evolutionary history does not result in greater diversity over geological time scales.

Authors:  J L Cantalapiedra; T Aze; M W Cadotte; G V Dalla Riva; D Huang; F Mazel; M W Pennell; M Ríos; A Ø Mooers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Conserving evolutionarily distinct species is critical to safeguard human well-being.

Authors:  Rafael Molina-Venegas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably.

Authors:  Florent Mazel; Matthew W Pennell; Marc W Cadotte; Sandra Diaz; Giulio Valentino Dalla Riva; Richard Grenyer; Fabien Leprieur; Arne O Mooers; David Mouillot; Caroline M Tucker; William D Pearse
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.