Literature DB >> 21300740

The journey to regulation of protein-based multiplex quantitative assays.

Emily S Boja1, Saeed A Jortani, James Ritchie, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Živana Težak, Elizabeth Mansfield, Penny Keller, Robert C Rivers, Amir Rahbar, N Leigh Anderson, Pothur Srinivas, Henry Rodriguez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical proteomics presents great promise in biology and medicine because of its potential for improving our understanding of diseases at the molecular level and for detecting disease-related biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic responses. To realize its full potential to improve clinical outcome for patients, proteomic studies have to be well designed, from biosample cohorts to data and statistical analyses. One key component in the biomarker development pipeline is the understanding of the regulatory science that evaluates diagnostic assay performance through rigorous analytical and clinical review criteria. CONTENT: The National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer (CPTC) initiative has proposed an intermediate preclinical "verification" step to close the gap between protein-based biomarker discovery and clinical qualification. In collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the CPTC network investigators recently published 2 mock submission review documents, first-of-their-kind educational materials that may help the scientific community interested in developing products for the clinic in understanding the likely analytical evaluation requirements for multiplex protein technology-based diagnostic tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Building on this momentum, the CPTC continues with this report its collaboration with the FDA, as well as its interactions with the AACC and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, to further the understanding of regulatory requirements for approving multiplex proteomic platform-based tests and analytically validating multiple analytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21300740     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.156034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  14 in total

1.  Perspective on diagnostics for global health.

Authors:  Elain Fu; Paul Yager; Pierre N Floriano; Nicolaos Christodoulides; John T McDevitt
Journal:  IEEE Pulse       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.924

Review 2.  Proteomic studies of urinary biomarkers for prostate, bladder and kidney cancers.

Authors:  Steven L Wood; Margaret A Knowles; Douglas Thompson; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery, verification, and validation--quality assurance and control of protein biomarker assays.

Authors:  Carol E Parker; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 4.  Measuring midkine: the utility of midkine as a biomarker in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  D R Jones
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Statistical design for biospecimen cohort size in proteomics-based biomarker discovery and verification studies.

Authors:  Steven J Skates; Michael A Gillette; Joshua LaBaer; Steven A Carr; Leigh Anderson; Daniel C Liebler; David Ransohoff; Nader Rifai; Marina Kondratovich; Živana Težak; Elizabeth Mansfield; Ann L Oberg; Ian Wright; Grady Barnes; Mitchell Gail; Mehdi Mesri; Christopher R Kinsinger; Henry Rodriguez; Emily S Boja
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Implementation of proteomic biomarkers: making it work.

Authors:  Harald Mischak; John P A Ioannidis; Angel Argiles; Teresa K Attwood; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Mark Broenstrup; Aristidis Charonis; George P Chrousos; Christian Delles; Anna Dominiczak; Tomasz Dylag; Jochen Ehrich; Jesus Egido; Peter Findeisen; Joachim Jankowski; Robert W Johnson; Bruce A Julien; Tim Lankisch; Hing Y Leung; David Maahs; Fulvio Magni; Michael P Manns; Efthymios Manolis; Gert Mayer; Gerjan Navis; Jan Novak; Alberto Ortiz; Frederik Persson; Karlheinz Peter; Hans H Riese; Peter Rossing; Naveed Sattar; Goce Spasovski; Visith Thongboonkerd; Raymond Vanholder; Joost P Schanstra; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 4.686

7.  Metal-Assisted Protein Quantitation (MAPq): Multiplex Analysis of Protein Expression Using Lanthanide-Modified Antibodies with Detection by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Sarah C Shuck; Cu Nguyen; Yin Chan; Timothy O'Connor; Alexandra K Ciminera; Michael Kahn; John Termini
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.008

8.  Aqueous two-phase system patterning of detection antibody solutions for cross-reaction-free multiplex ELISA.

Authors:  John P Frampton; Joshua B White; Arlyne B Simon; Michael Tsuei; Sophie Paczesny; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A microfluidic multiplex proteomic immunoassay device for translational research.

Authors:  Jing Cao; Jesse Seegmiller; Naomi Q Hanson; Christopher Zaun; Danni Li
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.988

Review 10.  Analytical validation considerations of multiplex mass-spectrometry-based proteomic platforms for measuring protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Emily S Boja; Thomas E Fehniger; Mark S Baker; György Marko-Varga; Henry Rodriguez
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.