OBJECTIVES: Relative to typical age-related cognitive decrements, the terms "terminal decline" and "terminal drop" refer to the phenomenon of increased cognitive decline in proximity to death. Given that these terms are not necessarily synonymous, we examined the important theoretical distinction between the two alternative trajectories or shapes of changes they imply. METHODS: We used 12-year (5-wave) data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study to directly test whether pre-death cognitive decrements follow a terminal decline (generally gradual) or a terminal drop (more abrupt) shape. Pre-death trajectories of cognitive decline for n=265 decedents (Mage = 72.67 years, SD = 6.44) were examined separately for 5 key cognitive constructs (verbal speed, working memory, episodic memory, semantic memory, and crystallized ability). RESULTS: Several classes of linear mixed models evaluated whether cognitive decline increased per additional year closer to death. Findings indicated that the shape of pre-death cognitive change was predominantly characterized by decline that is steeper as compared with typical aging-related change, but still best described as slow and steady decline, especially as compared with precipitous drop. DISCUSSION: The present findings suggest that terminal decline and terminal drop trajectories may not be mutually exclusive but could rather reflect distinct developmental trajectories within the same individual.
OBJECTIVES: Relative to typical age-related cognitive decrements, the terms "terminal decline" and "terminal drop" refer to the phenomenon of increased cognitive decline in proximity to death. Given that these terms are not necessarily synonymous, we examined the important theoretical distinction between the two alternative trajectories or shapes of changes they imply. METHODS: We used 12-year (5-wave) data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study to directly test whether pre-death cognitive decrements follow a terminal decline (generally gradual) or a terminal drop (more abrupt) shape. Pre-death trajectories of cognitive decline for n=265 decedents (Mage = 72.67 years, SD = 6.44) were examined separately for 5 key cognitive constructs (verbal speed, working memory, episodic memory, semantic memory, and crystallized ability). RESULTS: Several classes of linear mixed models evaluated whether cognitive decline increased per additional year closer to death. Findings indicated that the shape of pre-death cognitive change was predominantly characterized by decline that is steeper as compared with typical aging-related change, but still best described as slow and steady decline, especially as compared with precipitous drop. DISCUSSION: The present findings suggest that terminal decline and terminal drop trajectories may not be mutually exclusive but could rather reflect distinct developmental trajectories within the same individual.
Authors: Linda B Hassing; Boo Johansson; Stig Berg; Sven E Nilsson; Nancy L Pedersen; Scott M Hofer; Gerald McClearn Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Jirayu Tanprasertsuk; Elizabeth J Johnson; Mary Ann Johnson; Leonard W Poon; Peter T Nelson; Adam Davey; Peter Martin; Aron K Barbey; Kathryn Barger; Xiang-Dong Wang; Tammy M Scott Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Melinda C Power; Jennifer Weuve; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Jessica R Marden; Eric Vittinghoff; Niels Keiding; M Maria Glymour Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle; Eisuke Segawa; Lei Yu; Christopher T Begeny; Sophia E Anagnos; David A Bennett Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2013-02-18
Authors: Adam Davey; Ting Dai; John L Woodard; L Stephen Miller; Yasuyuki Gondo; Mary Ann Johnson; Dorothy B Hausman; Peter Martin; Robert C Green; Robert H Allen; Sally P Stabler; Leonard W Poon Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.645