Literature DB >> 21300222

Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.

Zongyang Sun1, Tharon Smith, Sahira Kortam, Do-Gyoon Kim, Boon Ching Tee, Henry Fields.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been used to assess alveolar bone changes after rapid palatal expansion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of alveolar bone-height measurements from CBCT images with varied bone thicknesses and imaging resolutions.
METHODS: Eleven maxillary specimens from 6-month-old pigs were measured for alveolar bone height (distance between drilled reference holes and alveolar crests) at 6 locations with a digital caliper, followed by CBCT scanning at 0.4-mm and 0.25-mm voxel sizes. Buccal alveolar bone of these locations was then reduced approximately by 0.5 to 1.5 mm, followed by CBCT rescanning with the same voxel sizes. The CBCT images were measured by using 3-dimensional software to determine alveolar bone height and thickness in buccolingual slices by independent, blinded raters. The specimens were subsequently cut into buccolingual sections at reference-hole levels, and direct bone height and thickness were measured from these sections. Intrarater and interrater repeatability and the differences between CBCT and direct measurements were assessed.
RESULTS: Excellent intrarater (intraclass correlations, r = 0.89-0.98) and good interrater (r = 0.64-0.90) repeatability values were found for alveolar bone-height measurements from the CBCT images. Before alveolar bone reduction, the thickness was much greater than the CBCT voxel size (0.4 mm), and bone-height measurements from the CBCT images were 0.5 to 1 mm more than the direct measurements (paired t tests, P <0.017 at most locations). After bone reduction, the thickness at the subcrest 1-mm level was near or below the CBCT voxel size (0.4 mm), and bone-height measurements from the CBCT images were 0.9 to 1.2 mm less than the direct measurements (paired t tests, P <0.017 at most locations). These measurement inaccuracies were substantially improved by decreasing the CBCT voxel size to 0.25 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar bone-height measurements from conventional clinical 0.4-mm voxel size CBCT images might overestimate alveolar bone-height loss associated with rapid palatal expansion.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21300222     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  39 in total

1.  Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maria Nikiforidou; Lazaros Tsalikis; Christos Angelopoulos; Georgios Menexes; Ioannis Vouros; Antonios Konstantinides
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Cristina Futagami; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Ricardo de Lima Navarro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  Changes in alveolar bone support induced by the Herbst appliance: a tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  João Paulo Schwartz; Taisa Boamorte Raveli; Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho; Dirceu Barnabé Raveli
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

4.  Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects.

Authors:  M E Kolsuz; N Bagis; K Orhan; H Avsever; K Ö Demiralp
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Marcelo Lupion Poleti; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Otávio Pagin; Marcela Rodrigues Moretti; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Masoumeh Eftekhar; Hanieh Kaviani; Nina Rouzmeh; Aitin Torabinia; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Orthopedic outcomes of hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders.

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Juan Martin Palomo; Fernando Pugliese; José Carlos da Cunha Bastos; Alexandre Magno Dos Santos; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?

Authors:  Stephanie Ting; Diana Attaia; K Brandon Johnson; Samer Shoukry Kossa; Bernard Friedland; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Mohamed I Masoud
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effects of symmetric and asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion treatments on pharyngeal airway and sinus volume.

Authors:  Emire Aybuke Erdur; Mucahid Yıldırım; Rabia Merve Celik Karatas; Mehmet Akin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hayriye Cetmili; Melek Tassoker; Sevgi Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.