OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a workplace-based weight loss program (Workplace POWER-WP) for male shift workers. METHOD: A prospective, two-armed randomized controlled trial of 110 overweight/obese (BMI 25-40) (mean [SD] age = 44.4 [8.6] years; BMI = 30.5 [3.6]) male employees at Tomago Aluminium aged 18-65. In October (2009) men were randomized to either (i) WP program (n=65) or (ii) a 14-week wait-list control group (n=45). The 3-month program involved one information session, program booklets, group-based financial incentives and an online component. Men were assessed at baseline and at 14-week follow-up for weight (primary outcome), waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure, resting heart rate, self-reported physical activity and dietary variables, and physical activity and dietary cognitions. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis using linear mixed models revealed significant between group differences for weight loss after 14 weeks (P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.34). Significant intervention effects were also found for waist circumference (P < .001, d = 0.63), BMI (P < .001, d = 0.41), systolic blood pressure (P = .02, d = 0.48), resting heart rate (P < .001, d = 0.81), physical activity (P = .03, d = 0.77), sweetened beverages (P < .02, d = 0.5-0.6) and physical activity-related cognitions (P < .02, d=0.6). CONCLUSION: The WP program was feasible and efficacious and resulted in significant weight loss and improved health-related outcomes and behaviours in overweight male shift workers.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a workplace-based weight loss program (Workplace POWER-WP) for male shift workers. METHOD: A prospective, two-armed randomized controlled trial of 110 overweight/obese (BMI 25-40) (mean [SD] age = 44.4 [8.6] years; BMI = 30.5 [3.6]) male employees at Tomago Aluminium aged 18-65. In October (2009) men were randomized to either (i) WP program (n=65) or (ii) a 14-week wait-list control group (n=45). The 3-month program involved one information session, program booklets, group-based financial incentives and an online component. Men were assessed at baseline and at 14-week follow-up for weight (primary outcome), waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure, resting heart rate, self-reported physical activity and dietary variables, and physical activity and dietary cognitions. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis using linear mixed models revealed significant between group differences for weight loss after 14 weeks (P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.34). Significant intervention effects were also found for waist circumference (P < .001, d = 0.63), BMI (P < .001, d = 0.41), systolic blood pressure (P = .02, d = 0.48), resting heart rate (P < .001, d = 0.81), physical activity (P = .03, d = 0.77), sweetened beverages (P < .02, d = 0.5-0.6) and physical activity-related cognitions (P < .02, d=0.6). CONCLUSION: The WP program was feasible and efficacious and resulted in significant weight loss and improved health-related outcomes and behaviours in overweight male shift workers.
Authors: Matt C Jackson; Shifan Dai; Renée A Skeete; Michelle Owens-Gary; Michael J Cannon; Bryce D Smith; Rajai Jabrah; Svetlana E Masalovich; Robin E Soler Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Jeffrey T Kullgren; Andrea B Troxel; George Loewenstein; David A Asch; Laurie A Norton; Lisa Wesby; Yuanyuan Tao; Jingsan Zhu; Kevin G Volpp Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: L Susan Wieland; Louise Falzon; Chris N Sciamanna; Kimberlee J Trudeau; Suzanne Brodney; Joseph E Schwartz; Karina W Davidson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-08-15
Authors: Michael J Coons; Andrew Demott; Joanna Buscemi; Jennifer M Duncan; Christine A Pellegrini; Jeremy Steglitz; Alexander Pictor; Bonnie Spring Journal: Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep Date: 2012-04
Authors: Rebecca A Jones; Emma R Lawlor; Jack M Birch; Manal I Patel; André O Werneck; Erin Hoare; Simon J Griffin; Esther M F van Sluijs; Stephen J Sharp; Amy L Ahern Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2020-10-25 Impact factor: 9.213